skip to main content
10.1145/1352694.1352732acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageseatis-orgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A 3-level information architecture for e-learning based on data warehousing

Published:14 May 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Developing high quality learning content material is expensive and time-consuming. Nowadays, in order to reduce costs and development time, there is an emphasis on reuse. The approach of object orientation has been used for promoting reuse. When this approach is applied to the development of learning content, it results in learning objects. However, there isn't a well-accepted and used methodology for the development of such objects and usually the reuse is based on the multimedia files that are referenced through metadata. In this paper we describe three levels of information that should be considered when dealing with e-learning content. An analogy to Data Warehouse architectures is proposed. Our approach allows keeping the already existing LO repositories and their autonomy, while the semantics of the content is structured to be reused in a personalized way. In addition, the mature of Data Warehousing technologies enhances the implementation of the 3-level information architecture for e-learning, which leads to a richer scenario for content reuse. Finally, the Data Warehouse idea of navigating (i.e., exploring content) can also stimulate students to go further on the quest for knowledge. We present how existing standard proposals can be used through the three levels and describe a case study.

References

  1. Polsani, P. R., "Use and Abuse of Reusable Learning Objects", Journal of Digital Information, Vol. 3, N. 4, Article No. 164, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Wiley, D. A., "Learning Object Design and Sequencing Theory", PhD Thesis, Department of Intructional Psychology and Technology, Brigham Young University, Provo, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barritt, C., Lewis, D., "Reusable Learning Object Strategy: Definition, Creation Process, and Guidelines for Building", Version 3.1, Cisco Systems, Inc., April 22, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Merrill, M. D., Twitchell, D. G. (Ed.), "Instructional Design Theory". Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hamel, C. J., Ryan-Jones, D., "Designing Instruction with Learning Objects", International Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 3, N. 1, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Baruque, L. B., Porto, F., Melo, R. N., "Towards an Instructional Design Methdology Based on Learning Objects", Proceedings of 6th IASTED CATE, Rhodes, Greece, June 2003, pp. 259--264.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Siqueira, S. W. M., Braz, M. H. L. B., Melo, R. N., "From Scenarios to a Generic Architecture for Education and Training Systems", Proceedings of 6th IASTED CATE, Rhodes, Greece, June 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Siqueira, S. W. M., Braz, M. H. L. B., Melo, R. N., "Web Technology for Education and Training", Proceedings of 4th International Workshop on Management of Information on the Web (MIW'2003), Prague, Czech Republic, 2003, pp. 337--341. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Siqueira, S. W. M., Braz, M. H. L. B., Melo, R. N., "E-Learning Environment Based on Framework Composition", Proceedings of 3rd ICALT, Athens, Greece, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Siqueira, S. W. M., Braz, M. H. L. B., Melo, R. N., "Composing Frameworks to Achieve an E-Learning Framework", Proceedings of 7th IASTED CATE, Kauai, USA, Ago. 2004, pp. 118--123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Siqueira, S. W. M., Braz, M. H. L. B., Melo, R. N., "E-Learning Groupware Metadata", Proceedings of 3rd ICTTLHE, Heidelberg, Germany, Sep. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Siqueira, S. W. M., Braz, M. H. L. B., Melo, R. N., "E-Learning Content Warehouse Architecture", Proceedings of IADIS WWW/Internet 2002, IADIS Press, Lisbon, Portugal, 2002, pp. 739--742.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Moura, S. L., Santos, R. J. N., Silva, D. S., Siqueira, S. W. M., Braz, M. H. L. B., Melo, R. N., "Metadata Replication in E-Learning Using Web-Services and Ontologies", Proceedings of 6th iiWAS, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2004, pp.103--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Siqueira, S. W. M., Braz, M. H. L. B., Melo, R. N., "Increasing the Semantics of Learning Objects", International Journal of Computer Processing of Oriental Languages, Vol. 17, N. 1, 2004, pp. 27--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Moura, S. L., Coutinho, F. J., Siqueira, S. W. M., Melo, R. N., "Integrating Repositories of Learning Objects Using Web-Services to Implement Mediators and Wrappers", Proceedings of NWESP'05, Seoul, South Korea, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Naeve, A., "The Garden of Knowledge as a Knowledge Manifold: A Conceptual Framework for Computer Supported Subjective Education", Technical Report, CID, Dept. Computing Science, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Wiig, E. H., Wiig, K. M., "On Conceptual Learning", Knowledge Research Institute, Inc., 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Garrido, P., Tramullas, J., "Topic Maps: An Alternative or a Complement to Conceptual Maps?", Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Concept Mapping, Cañas, A. J.; Novak, J. D., González, F. M. (Ed.), Pamplona, Spain, Set. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Aroyo, L., Dicheva, D., "Authoring Framework for Concept-based Web Information Systems", Proceedings of ICCE Workshop on Concepts and Ontologies in Web-based Educational Systems, Auckland, New Zeland, 2002, pp. 43--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Mayorga, J. I., Verdejo, M. F., Rodriguez, M., Calero, M. Y., "Domain Modelling to Support Educational Web-based Authoring", Proceedings of Telecommunications for Education and Training Congress (TET'99), Oslo, Norway, Jun. 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rodriguez-Artacho, M., Maillo, M. F. V., "Modeling Educational Content: The Cognitive Approach of the PALO Language", Educational Technology & Society, v. 7, n. 3, 2004, pp. 124--137.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilson, R., "The Role of Ontologies in Teaching and Learning", TechWatch report, JISC, Ago. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Qin, J., Hernandez, N., "Ontological Representation of Learning Objects: Building Interoperable Vocabulary and Structures", Proceedings of 13th WWW 2004, New York, USA, Mai. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Brase, J., Nejdl, W., "Ontologies and Metadata for eLearning", Handbook on Ontologies, Springer-Verlag, 2003, pp. 555--574.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Brase, J., Painter, M., Nejdl, W., "Completing LOM - How Additional Axioms Increase the Utility of Learning Object Metadata", Proceedings of 3rd ICALT, Athens, Greece, Jul. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Munoz, L. S., Oliveira, J. P. M., "Adaptive Web-Based Courseware Development using Metadata Standards and Ontologies", Proceedings of CAISE 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, v. 3084, Riga, Latvia, 2004, pp. 414--428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Henze, N., Dolog, P., Nejdl, W., "Reasoning and Ontologies for Personalized E-Learning in the Semantic Web", Educational Technology & Society, v. 7, n. 4, 2004, pp. 82--97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Koper, R., "Modeling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: the pedagogical meta-model behind EML", Open University of the Netherlands: Educational Technology Expertise Centre, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc., IMS Learning Design Information Model, Version 1.0, Final Specification, 20 January 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Yang, T. D., Lin, T., Wu, K., "An Agent-Based Recommender System for Lesson Plan Sequencing", Proceedings of 2nd ICALT, Kazan, Russia, Sep. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Chen, J., Sawyer, S., McKinney, J., Zhang, L., "Defining a Simple Sequence for RLOs", Learning Technology newsletter, v.6, n.2, 2004, pp.16--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Farrell, R., Liburd, S. D., Thomas, John C., "Dynamic Assembly of Learning Objects", Proceedings of WWW 2004, New York, USA, May 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Bouzeghoub, A., Carpentier, C., Defude, B., Duitama, F., "A Model of Reusable Educational Components for the Generation of Adaptative Courses", Workshops Proceedings of Semantic Web for Web-based Learning (SW-WL'03), CAiSE '03, Klagenfurt/Velden, Austria, Jun. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Su, S. Y. W., Lee, G., Lampotang, S., "Learning Object and Dynamic E-Learning Service Technologies for Simulation-Based Medical Instruction", Proceedings of the International Workshop on Web-based Learning, 6th WISE, New York, USA, Nov. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc., "IMS Learner Information Packaging - Information Model Specification - Public Draft Specification", Version 0.4, Nov. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee -- LTSC, "Draft Standard for Learning Technology -- Public and Private Information (PAPI) for Learners (PAPI Learner)", Nov. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc., "IMS Content Packaging v1.1.4 Final Specification", retrieved January 6, 2007 from http://www.imsglobal.org/content/packaging.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. W3C (World Wide Web Consortium), "Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 2.0)", Ago. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodrigues, R. F., "Formatting and Controlling of Hypermedia Presentations with Temporal Adaptation Mechanisms". Ph.D. Thesis, Computer Science Department, PUC-Rio. (in Portuguese). Rio de Janeiro, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Noy, N. F., Mcguinness, D. L., "Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology", 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. A 3-level information architecture for e-learning based on data warehousing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      EATIS '07: Proceedings of the 2007 Euro American conference on Telematics and information systems
      May 2007
      498 pages
      ISBN:9781595935984
      DOI:10.1145/1352694

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 May 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate17of64submissions,27%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader