ABSTRACT
This paper presents a modelling framework, Web Interaction Environments, to express the synergies and differences of audiences, in order to study universal usability of the Web. Based on this framework, we have expressed the implicit model of WCAG and developed an experimental study to assess the Web accessibility quality of Wikipedia at a macro scale. This has resulted on finding out that template mechanisms such as those provided by Wikipedia lower the burden of producing accessible contents, but provide no guarantee that hyperlinking to external websites maintain accessibility quality. We discuss the black-boxed nature of guidelines such as WCAG and how formalising audiences helps leveraging universal usability studies of the Web at macro scales.
- R. Baecker, K. Booth, S. Jovicic, J. McGrenere, and G. Moore. Reducing the gap between what users know and what they need to know. In CUU '00: Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability, pages 17--23, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Berners-Lee, W. Hall, J. A. Hendler, K. O'Hara, N. Shadbolt, and D. J. Weitzner. A Framework for Web Science. Found. Trends Web Sci., 1(1):1--130, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. A. Botafogo, E. Rivlin, and B. Shneiderman. Structural analysis of hypertexts: identifying hierarchies and useful metrics. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 10(2):142--180, 1992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Caldwell, W. Chisholm, J. Slatin, and G. Vanderheiden. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. W3C Working Draft, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), May 2007. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/.Google Scholar
- S. Ceri, F. Daniel, M. Matera, and F. M. Facca. Model-driven development of context-aware Web applications. ACM Trans. Inter. Tech., 7(1):2, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. F. Codd. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Commun. ACM, 13(6):377--387, 1970. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Dhyani, W. K. Ng, and S. S. Bhowmick. A survey of web metrics. ACM Comput. Surv., 34(4):469--503, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Fink, A. Kobsa, and A. Nill. Towards a user-adapted information environment on the Web. In Multimedia and Standardization 98, 1998.Google Scholar
- F. Garzotto, L. Mainetti, and P. Paolini. Hypermedia design, analysis, and evaluation issues. Commun. ACM, 38(8):74--86, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Gauch, M. Speretta, A. Chandramouli, and A. Micarelli. User Profiles for Personalized Information Access. pages 54--89. 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Heckmann. Ubiquitous User Modeling. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Saarland University, November 2005.Google Scholar
- ISO/TS 16071:2003 - Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Guidance on accessibility for human-computer interfaces, 2003.Google Scholar
- M. Y. Ivory and M. A. Hearst. The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces. ACM Comput. Surv., 33(4):470--516, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. R. K. Jahng, J.; Jain. Effective design of electronic commerce environments: a proposed theory of congruence and an illustration. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A, IEEE Transactions on, 30(4):456--471, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Kappel, B. Prll, W. Retschitzegger, W. Schwinger, and T. Hofer. Modeling Ubiquitous Web Applications - A Comparison of Approaches. In Int. Conf. on Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services (iiWAS), Sep 2001.Google Scholar
- M. Kellar, C. Watters, and M. Shepherd. A Goal-based Classification of Web Information Tasks. Proceedings 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 43, Sep 2007.Google Scholar
- R. Lopes and L. Carriço. Leveraging Rich Accessible Documents on the Web. In W4A'2007: the 4th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, Banff, Canada, 2007. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Masinter, D. Wing, A. Mutz, and K. Holtman. Media Features for Display, Print, and Fax. RFC 2534, IEFT, Mar. 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Nielsen. Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity. New Riders Publishing, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Z. Obrenovic, J. Abascal, and D. Starcevic. Universal accessibility as a multimodal design issue. Commun. ACM, 50(5):83--88, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Z. Obrenovic and D. Starcevic. Modeling Multimodal Human-Computer Interaction. Computer, 37(9):65--72, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Z. Obrenovic, D. Starcevic, and B. Selic. A model-driven approach to content repurposing. IEEE Multimedia, 11(1):62--71, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. W. Palmer. Web Site Usability, Design, and Performance Metrics. Info. Sys. Research, 13(2):151--167, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Petrie and O. Kheir. The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites. In CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 397--406, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Preece, H. Sharp, D. Benyon, S. Holland, and T. Carey. Human Computer Interaction. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Schreiber and M. Dean. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium, February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/.Google Scholar
- B. Shneiderman. Universal Usability. Commun. ACM, 43(5):84--91, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Shneiderman. Promoting universal usability with multi-layer interface design. In CUU '03: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Universal usability, pages 1--8, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Shneiderman. Web Science: A Provocative Invitation to Computer Science. Commun. ACM, 50(6):25--27, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Sloan, P. Gregor, M. Rowan, and P. Booth. Accessible accessibility. In CUU '00: Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability, pages 96--101, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. K. Smith, C. Welty, and D. L. McGuinness. OWL Web Ontology Language Guide. W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium, February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/.Google Scholar
- O. Troyer, W. Goedefroy, and R. Meersman. UR-WSDM: Adding User Requirements Granularity to Model Web-based Information Systems. In First Workshop on Hypermedia Development, HT'98., 1998.Google Scholar
- E. Velleman, C. Meerveld, C. Strobbe, J. Koch, C. A. Velasco, M. Snaprud, and A. Nietzio. Unified Web Evaluation Methodology (UWEM 1.2), 2007.Google Scholar
- M. Vigo, M. Arrue, G. Brajnik, R. Lomuscio, and J. Abascal. Quantitative metrics for measuring web accessibility. In W4A '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), pages 99--107, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Vigo, A. Kobsa, M. Arrue, and J. Abascal. User-tailored web accessibility evaluations. In HT '07: Proceedings of the 18th conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, pages 95--104. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W3C Device Independence Group. Composite Capability/Preference Profiles (CC/PP): Structure and Vocabularies 1.0. W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium, January 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/CCPP-struct-vocab/.Google Scholar
Recommendations
The role of accessibility in a universal web
W4A '14: Proceedings of the 11th Web for All Conference"Universal design" is the process of creating products that are usable by people with the widest possible range of abilities, operating within the widest possible range of situations; whereas "accessibility" primarily refers to design for people with ...
Web accessibility: is it just a "merry-go-round"?
W4A '06: Proceedings of the 2006 international cross-disciplinary workshop on Web accessibility (W4A): Building the mobile web: rediscovering accessibility?While many of the issues that are being raised in relation to mobile web accessibility are similar or the same to those that have been promoted over the past few years in relation to mainstream web accessibility, that doesn't necessarily mean that we're ...
One year older, but not necessarily wiser: an evaluation of homepage accessibility problems over time
A large number of users with disabilities use assistive technology devices to browse the web. However, the use of assistive technologies can only be successful when the web sites are developed in such a way that they are compatible with such devices. ...
Comments