skip to main content
10.1145/1368044.1368059acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesw4aConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluating web accessibility for specific mobile devices

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a tool for evaluating web accessibility for mobile devices regardless their software, hardware or user agent characteristics. Taking the mobileOK Basic tests by the W3C as a basis, these tests are extended so that device characteristics can be considered in the evaluation process. A sound tool that takes into account these extended tests has been developed. Device features of a given device are retrieved from heterogeneous device description repositories and CC/PP based profiles are automatically generated. Based on these profiles, evaluation queries are dynamically created obtaining device-tailored evaluation reports. Finally, in order to demonstrate the feasibility of the tool, a case study has been conducted concluding that the tool reduces the number of false positives and false negatives.

References

  1. Abascal, J., Arrue, M., Fajardo, I., Garay, N. and Tomás, J. The use of guidelines to automatically verify Web accessibility. Universal Access in the Information Society 3(1), 71--79, Springer, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Arrue, M., Vigo, M. and Abascal, J. Automatic Evaluation of Mobile Web Accessibility. In C. Stephanidis and M. Pieper (Eds.). Universal Access in Ambient Intelligent Environments, UI4All 2006 (Königswinter, Germany, September 27--28, 2006). LNCS 4397, 244--260, Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Arrue M., Vigo M. and Abascal J. Including Heterogeneous Web Accessibility Guidelines in the Development Process. 1st Conference on Engineering Interactive Systems, EIS 2007, EHCI, HCSE and DSV -IS 2007 joint conference (Salamanca, Spain, March 22--24, 2007). To be published in LNCS by Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Barstow, C., McKell, M., Rothberg, M. and Schmidt, C. (2002, June). IMS Guidelines for Developing Accessible Learning Applications 1.0. http://www.imsglobal.org/accessibility/accessiblevers/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bickmore, T. W. and Schilit, B. N. Digestor: device-independent access to the World Wide Web. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 29, 1075--1082, Elsevier, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Boag, S., Chamberlin, D., Fernández, M. F., Florescu, D., Robie, J. and Siméon, J. (Eds.). (2007, January 23). XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language (W3C Recommendation). Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, M, Giannetti, F., Gimson, R. and Wiley, T. Device Independence and the Web. IEEE Internet Computing 6(5), 81--86, IEEE Educational Activities Department, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G. and Jacobs, I. (Eds.). (1999, May 5). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (W3C Recommendation). Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Correani, F., Leporini, B. and Paternó, F. Supporting Web Usability for Vision Impaired Users. In C. Stary and C. Stephanidis (Eds.). User-Centered Interaction Paradigms for Universal Access in the Information Society, UI4All 2004 (Vienna, Austria, June 28--29, 2004). LNCS 3196, 242--253, Springer, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Garofalakis, J. and Stefanis, V. Using RSS for effective mobile web browsing. Universal Access in the Information Society 6(3), 249--257, Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Harper, S. Mobile Web: Reinventing the Wheel? ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing 90, 16--18, ACM Press, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jones, M., Buchanan, G. and Thimbleby, H. Improving web search on small screen devices. Interacting with Computers 15(4), 479--495, 2003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kaikkonen, A. and Roto, V. Navigating in a Mobile XHTML Application. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, CHI 2003 (Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA, April 5--10, 2003). 329--336, ACM Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Klyne, G., Reynolds, F., Woodrow, F., Ohto, H., Hjelm, J., Butler, M. and Tran, L. (Eds.) (2004, January 15). Composite Capability/Preference Profiles (CC/PP): Structure and Vocabularies 1.0. (W3C Recommendation). Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/CCPP-struct-vocab/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kurniawan, S. and Zaphiris, P. Research-derived web design guidelines for older people. 8th ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS 2005 (Baltimore, MD, USA, October 9--12, 2005). 129--135, ACM Press, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mankoff, J., Dey, A., Batra, U. and Moore, M. Web Accessibility for Low Bandwidth Input. 5th ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS 2002 (Edinburgh, United Kingdom, July 8--10, 2002). 17--24, ACM Press, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Owen, S. and Rabin, J. (Eds.) (2007, November 30). W3C mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0. (W3C Candidate Recommendation). Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Prud'hommeaux, E. and Seaborne, A. (Eds.) (2008, January 15). SPARQL Query Language for RDF. (W3C Recommendation). Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Rabin, J. and McCathieNevile, C. (Eds.). (2006, November 2). Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0. (W3C Proposed Recommendation). Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Thatcher, J., Burks, M. R., Heilmann, C., Lawton Henry, S., Kirkpatrick, A., Lauke, P. H., Lawson, B., Regan, B., Rutter, R., Urban, M. and Waddell, C. D. Web Accessibility: Web Standards and Regulatory Compliance. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Trewin, S. Physical Usability and the Mobile Web. International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility, W4A 2006 (Edinburgh, United Kingdom, May 22--23, 2006). 109--112, ACM Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Vigo, M., Kobsa, A., Arrue, M. and Abascal, J. User-Tailored Web Accessibility Evaluations. 18th Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, HYPERTEXT 2007 (Manchester, United Kingdom, September 10--12, 2007). 95--104, ACM Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating web accessibility for specific mobile devices

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          W4A '08: Proceedings of the 2008 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A)
          April 2008
          207 pages
          ISBN:9781605581538
          DOI:10.1145/1368044

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 April 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          W4A '08 Paper Acceptance Rate12of29submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate171of371submissions,46%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader