skip to main content
10.1145/1377999.1378003acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Xensible interruptions from your mobile phone

Published:09 September 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile phones may interrupt in any place at any time. Using the SocioXensor research tool on people's own mobile phones, we conducted an experience sampling study to explore which context information predicts a person's availability for a phone call, and which context information people wanted to disclose to particular social relations. Like other studies, we found that a small set of context information can help initiators of phone calls to improve their ability to know when recipients are receptive to phone calls. We also found that if we restrict the information to information recipients actually want to disclose, which is only a small subset of all information, enough context information is still available for initiators of phone calls to improve their ability to know when recipients are receptive to phone calls.

References

  1. Avrahami, D., Fogarty, J. & Hudson, S. E. Biases in human estimation of interruptibility: Effects and implications for practice. In Proceedings of CHI 2007. ACM: New York, 2007, 50--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Begole J., Matsakis N. E. & Tang J. C. Lilsys: Sensing unavailability. In Proceedings of CSCW2004, ACM: New York, 2004, 511--514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Consolvo, S. Smith, I. E., Matthews, T. LaMarca, A., Tabert, J. & Powledge, P. Location disclosure to social relations: Why, when, & what people want to share. In Proceedings of CHI 2005. ACM: New York, 2005, 81--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Larson, R. Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175 (1987), 526--536.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Fogarty, J., Hudson, S. E, Atkeson, C. G., Avrahami, D., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S., Lee, J. C., and Yang, J. Predicting Human Interruptibility with Sensors. ACM TOCHI, 12, 1 (2005), 119--146 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ho, J., & Intille, S. S. Using context-aware computing to reduce the perceived burden of interruptions from mobile devices. In Proceedings of CHI 2005. ACM: New York, 2005, 909--918. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hudson, J. M., Christensen, J., Kellogg, W. A. and Erickson, T. "I'd be overwhelmed, but it's just one more thing to do": Availability and Interruption in Research Management. In Proceedings of CHI 2002, ACM: New York, 2002, 97--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Khalil, A. & Connelly, K. Context-aware telephony: Privacy preferences and sharing patterns. In Proceedings of CSCW2006, ACM: New York, 2006, 469--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Raento, M., Oulasvirta, A., Petit, R., & Toivonen, H. ContextPhone: A prototyping platform for context-aware mobile applications. Pervasive computing, 4, 2 (April-June 2005), 51--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Schilit, B. N., Hilbert, D. M., & Trevor, J. (2002). Context-aware communication. IEEE Wireless Communications, 9, 5 (2002), 46--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Schmidt, A., Stuhr, T. and Hans Gellersen. Context-Phonebook - Extending Mobile Phone Applications with Context. In Proceedings of MobileHCI 2001, IHM-HCI: Lille, France, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ter Hofte, G. H., Otte, R. A. A., Kruse, H. C. J., & Snijders, M. Context-aware communication with Live Contacts. In Conference Supplement of CSCW2004, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ter Hofte, G. H., Otte, R. A. A., Peddemors, A., Mulder, I. What's Your Lab Doing in My Pocket? Supporting Mobile Field Studies with SocioXensor. In Conference Supplement of CSCW2006. ACM: New York, 2006, 109--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Tang, J. C., Yankelovich, N., Begole, J., Van Kleek, M., Li, F., & Bhalodia, J. ConNexus to awarenex: extending awareness to mobile users. In Proceedings of CHI'01, ACM: New York, 2001, 221--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Witten, I. H. & Frank, E. Data mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, Second edition. Morgan Kaufman: San Francisco, CA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Xensible interruptions from your mobile phone

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          MobileHCI '07: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services
          September 2007
          352 pages
          ISBN:9781595938626
          DOI:10.1145/1377999

          Copyright © 2007 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 9 September 2007

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader