skip to main content
10.1145/1389095.1389393acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evolutionary algorithms for automated drug design towards target molecule properties

Published:12 July 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an evolutionary algorithm for the automated design of molecules that could be used as drugs. It is designed to provide the medicinal chemist with a number of candidate molecules that comply to pre-defined properties. These candidate molecules can be promising for further evaluation.

The proposed algorithm is implemented as an extension to the so-called Molecule Evoluator [3] which implements an interactive evolutionary algorithm. The Molecule Evoluator is extended with an automated evolutionary algorithm that implements a variable sized population and bases its search on target-bounds that are set for a number of molecule properties. Moreover, the algorithm uses a selection procedure based on the notion of Pareto domination.

The results show that it is indeed possible to apply the concept of evolutionary computation on automated molecule design using target-bounds for molecule properties as optimization goals. For practical usage, the presented algorithm could serve as a starting point, but should be further improved with respect to diversity within the generated set of molecules.

References

  1. K. Deb. Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Koza. Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. E.-W. Lameijer, J. Kok, T. Bäck, and A. IJzerman. The molecule evoluator: An interactive evolutionary algorithm for the design of drug-like molecules. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 46(2):545 -- 552, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. C. Lipinski, F. Lombardo, B. Dominy, and P. Feeney. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and developments settings. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 46(1-3):3--26, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. W. Mahfoud. Niching methods for genetic algorithms. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. G. Rudolph and A. Agapie. Convergence properties of some multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation CEC00, pages 1010--1016, California, USA, 2000. IEEE Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. D. Weininger. Smiles, a chemical language and information system. 1. introduction to methodology and encoding rules. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science, 28(1):31--36, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Evolutionary algorithms for automated drug design towards target molecule properties

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '08: Proceedings of the 10th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
      July 2008
      1814 pages
      ISBN:9781605581309
      DOI:10.1145/1389095
      • Conference Chair:
      • Conor Ryan,
      • Editor:
      • Maarten Keijzer

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 July 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      GECCO '24
      Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 14 - 18, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader