skip to main content
10.1145/1391469.1391605acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Merging nodes under sequential observability

Published:08 June 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a new type of sequential technology independent synthesis. Building on the previous notions of combinational observability and sequential equivalence, sequential observability is introduced and discussed. By considering both the sequential nature of the design and observability simultaneously, better results can be obtained than with either algorithm alone. The experimental results show that this method can reduce the technology-independent gate count up to 10% more than the previously best known synthesis techniques.

References

  1. J. Baumgartner, "Integrating FV Into Main-Stream Verification: The IBM Experience," Tutorial Given at FMCAD 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Chatterjee, A. Mishchenko, R. K. Brayton, X. Wang, and T. Kam, "Reducing structural bias in technology mapping," in ICCAD 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. N. Mneimneh and K. A. Sakallah, "Principles of sequential-equivalence verification," in IEEE Design and Test Comp, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Kuehlmann and F. Krohm, "Equivalence checking using cuts and heaps," in DAC 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Brand, "Verification of large synthesized designs," in ICCAD 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. W. Kunz, "HANNIBAL: An efficient tool for logic verification based on recursive learning," in ICCAD 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. W. Kunz, D. Stoffel, and P. Menon, "Logic optimization and equivalence checking by implication analysis," in ICCAD 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. E. Goldberg, M. R. Prasad, and R. K. Brayton, "Using SAT in combinational equivalence checking," in DATE 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. F. Lu, L. C. Wang, K. T. Cheng, and R. C. Y. Huang, "A circuit SAT solver with signal correlation guided learning," in DATE 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Berkeley Logic Synthesis and Verification Group, ABC: A System for Sequential Synthesis and Verification, http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~alanmi/abc/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. C. van Eijk, "Sequential equivalence checking based on structural similarities," in IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design, July 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Devadas, A. Ghosh, and K. Keutzer, "Logic Synthesis," McGraw-Hill 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Q. Zhu, N. Kitchen, A. Kuehlmann, and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, "SAT sweeping with local observability don't cares," in DAC 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Plaza, K. H. Chang, I. Markov, and V. Bertacco, "Node Mergers in the Presence of Don't Cares," in ASPDAC 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. C. E. Leiserson and J. B. Saxe, "Retiming synchronous circuitry," in Algorithmica 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Bjesse and K. Claessen, "SAT-based Verification without State Space Traversal," in FMCAD 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. H. K. Ma, S. Devadas, A. R. Newton, and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, "Test generation for sequential circuits," in CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P. H. Ho, T. Shiple, K. Harer, J. Kukula, R. Damiano, V. Bertacco, J. Taylor, and J. Long, "Smart simulation using collaborative formal and simulation engines," in ICCAD 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. W. A. Burkhard and R. M. Keller, "Some approaches to best-match file searching," in Communications of the ACM 1973. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. L. A. Steen and J. A. Seebach, "Counterexamples in Topology," Courier Dover Publications 1970, Page 34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. M. R. Prasad, A. Biere, and A. Gupta, "A Survey of Recent Advances in SAT-Based Formal Verification," in Software Tools for Technology Transfer 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Niklas Een, Niklas Sorensson, MiniSat. http://www.cs.chalmers.se/Cs/Research/FormalMethods/MiniSat/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sun Microsystems, "Processor Technology Resources - picoJava," http://www.sun.com/software/communitysource/processors/picojava.xmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. A. Mishchenko, S. Chatterjee, and R. K. Brayton, "DAG-aware AIG rewriting: A fresh look at combinational logic synthesis," in DAC 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. P. Bjesse and J. Kukula, "Automatic Phase Abstraction for Formal Verification," in ICCAD 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Merging nodes under sequential observability

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DAC '08: Proceedings of the 45th annual Design Automation Conference
      June 2008
      993 pages
      ISBN:9781605581156
      DOI:10.1145/1391469
      • General Chair:
      • Limor Fix

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 June 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,770of5,499submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      DAC '24
      61st ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference
      June 23 - 27, 2024
      San Francisco , CA , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader