skip to main content
10.1145/1401890.1401996acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The persuasive phase of visualization

Published:24 August 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Research in visualization often revolves around visualizing information. However, visualization is a process that extends over time from initial exploration to hypothesis confirmation, and even to result presentation. It is rare that the final phases of visualization are solely about information. In this paper we present a more biased kind of visualization, in which there is a message or set of assumptions behind the presentation that is of interest to both the presenter and the viewer, and emphasizes points that the presenter wants to convey to the viewer. This kind of persuasive visualization -- presenting data in a way that emphasizes a point or message -- is not only common in visualization, but also often expected by the viewer. Persuasive visualization is implicit in the deliberate emphasis on interestingness and also in the deliberate use of graphical elements that are processed preattentively by the human visual system, which automatically groups these elements and guiding attention so that they "stand out". We discuss how these ideas have been implemented in the Morpherspective system for automated generation of information graphics.

References

  1. Bertin, J. (trans. by Berg, W.J.) 1983. Semiology of Graphics, The University of Wisconsin Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Casner, S.M. 1991. A Task-Analytic Approach to the Automated Design of Graphic Presentations. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 10(2), ACM, 111--151 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chih, C.H. 2006. Fluid Hierarchies: Automated Generation of Emphatic Information Graphics, Ph.D. Thesis, UCLA Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cialdini, R.B. 1993. Influence: the Psychology of Persuasion, William MorrowGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Fasciano, M. and Lapalme, G. 1996. PostGraphe: a System for the Generation of Statistical Graphics and Text. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (INLG-96), 51--60Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Fasciano, M. and Lapalme, G. 2000. Intentions in the Coordinated Generation of Graphics and Text from Tabular Data. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2(3), Springer-Verlag, 310--39 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fogg, B.J. 1994. Persuasive Technology, Morgan KaufmannGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fujishiro, I., Ichikawa, Y., Furuhata, R., and Takeshima, Y. 2000. GADGET/IV: a Taxonomic Approach to Semi-Automatic Design of Information Visualization Applications Using Modular Visualization Environment. Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 2000, IEEE Computer Society, 77--83 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hilderman, R.J. and Hamilton, H.J. 2000. Principles for Mining Summaries Using Objective Measures of Interestingness. Proceedings 12th IEEE International Conference on Tools in Artificial Intelligence, IEEE, 72--81 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Huff, D. 1993. How to Lie with Statistics, W.W. Norton and Company Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jones, G.E. 1994. How to Lie with Charts, Authors Choice Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Keim, D.A. 1997. Visual Techniques for Exploring Databases. Invited Tutorial in International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD '97)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kleinberg, J. and Papadimitriou, C., Raghavan, P. 1998. A Microeconomic View of Data Mining. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2, 311--324 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kosslyn, S.M. 1993. Elements of Graph Design, W.H. Freeman & CompanyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mackinlay, J.D. 1986. Automating the Design of Graphical Presentations of Relational Information. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 5(2), ACM, 110--141 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mackinlay, J.D. 1986. Automatic Design of Graphical Presentations, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, 1986 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Monmonier, M. 1996. How to Lie with Maps, The University of Chicago PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Padmanabhan, B. and Tuzhilin, A. 1999. Unexpectedness as a Measure of Interestingness in Knowledge Discovery. Decision Support Systems, 27(3), Elsevier, 303--318 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Robinson, A. H. 1967. The thematic maps of Charles Joseph Minard. Imago Mundi, 21:95--108Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Roth, S.F., Kolojejchick, J., Mattis, J., and Goldstein, J. 1994. Interactive Graphic Design Using Automatic Presentation Knowledge. CHI '94 Conference Proceedings, ACM, 112--117, 476 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Roth, S.F. and Mattis, J. 1990. Data Characterization for Intelligent Graphics Presentation. CHI '90 Conference Proceedings, ACM, 193--200 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Roth, S.F. and Mattis, J. 1991. Automating the Presentation of Information. Proceedings. Seventh IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications 1991, IEEE Computer Society Press, 90--97Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. The SAGE Visualization Group, http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~sage/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Silberschatz, A. and Tuzhilin, A. 1996. What Makes Patterns Interesting in Knowledge Discovery Systems. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 8(6), IEEE, 970--974 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Simon, H. A. 1971. Designing Organizations for an Information-Rich World, The Johns Hopkins PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Simon, H. A. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd ed.), The MIT Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Tufte, E.R. 2001. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information (2nd edition), Graphics Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Tufte, E.R. 1990. Envisioning Information, Graphics Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Tufte, E.R. 1997. Visual Explanations, Graphics PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Ware, C. 2004. Information Visualization: Perception for Design, Morgan Kaufmann Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wilkinson, L. 1999. The Grammar of Graphics, Springer-Verlag Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Zhou, M.X. and Feiner, S.K. 1996. Data Characterization for Automatically Visualizing Heterogeneous Data. Proceedings, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 1996, IEEE Computer Society Press, 13--20, 117 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Zhou, M.X. and Feiner, S.K. 1998. Automated Visual Presentation: From Heterogeneous Information to Coherent Visual Discourse. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 11(3), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 205--234 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The persuasive phase of visualization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '08: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
      August 2008
      1116 pages
      ISBN:9781605581934
      DOI:10.1145/1401890
      • General Chair:
      • Ying Li,
      • Program Chairs:
      • Bing Liu,
      • Sunita Sarawagi

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 August 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      KDD '08 Paper Acceptance Rate118of593submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader