skip to main content
10.1145/1414004.1414074acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using the ProdFlow(TM) approach to address the myth of productivity in r&d organizations

Published:09 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Software productivity has been analyzed traditionally in terms of size measures such as LOC or FP. These measures have failed to provide a comprehensive basis for productivity analysis. In the research department of the Siemens AG the new approach ProdFLOW™ for the analysis and management of a research & development organization's productivity is being created based on a revised understanding of the term productivity. Former studies often start with fixed, typical indicators and quantitatively analyze the relation between productivity and the indicator by regression models. ProdFLOW™ departs from the fixed model approach, which might not fit to the conditions of the organization. Instead an organization-specific model based on the substantial levers of the productivity, which are both influenceable and measurable, are compiled together with the experts of the organization. The paper explains the new approach as well as gives an example to illustrate our approach based on the results of three performed case studies.

References

  1. B. Boehm et. al. Value-Based Software Engineering. Springer-Verlag 2005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T. Little, Value Creation and Capture, IEEE Software 2004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. T. DeMarco and T. Lister. Peopleware. Productive Projects and Teams. Dorset House Publishing, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. N. Fenton. Managing Risk in the Modern World, Application of Bayesian NetworksGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P. Aisenbrey. Deductive Empirical Social Research Based on the Non-Classic Theory of Self-Monitoring. PhD thesis. FU Berlin, 2007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Stamelos et. al. On the use of Bayesian belief networks for the prediction of software productivity, Information and Software Technology, Vol. 45 (2003), pp. 51--6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Using the ProdFlow(TM) approach to address the myth of productivity in r&d organizations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ESEM '08: Proceedings of the Second ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement
      October 2008
      374 pages
      ISBN:9781595939715
      DOI:10.1145/1414004
      • General Chair:
      • Dieter Rombach,
      • Program Chairs:
      • Sebastian Elbaum,
      • Jürgen Münch

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 October 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate130of594submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader