skip to main content
10.1145/1414471.1414515acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Evaluation of spatial abilities within a 2D auditory platform game

Published:13 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we compare the mental maps created by sighted participants with the maps created by participants with visual impairments during the study of an auditory platform game. The game uses audio cues to convey a 2D side-scrolling view of the spatial layout of the game world. We studied three groups with 9 participants each: a control group of sighted participants playing an audio-visual version of the game, sighted participants playing the audio-only version of the game, and participants with visual impairments playing the audio-only version of the game. Immediately after playing two of the game's levels, we transferred the participants' verbal descriptions of the level's layout onto paper maps and gave each map a "mapping score" that expressed how closely a map matched the actual layout of the game level. The results suggest that in this setting, all participants were able to create maps with roughly the same accuracy no matter which version of the game they played (audio-visual or audio-only) and independent of the participant's level of visual ability (sighted persons or persons with visual impairments).

References

  1. Loomis, Jack; Marston, James; Golledge, Reginald; Klatzky, Roberta (2005, April). "Personal Guidance System for People with Visual Impairment: A Comparison of Spatial Displays for Route Guidance". Journal of Visual Impairment and BlindnessGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Stockman, Tony; Hind, Greg; Frauenberger, Christopher (2005, July). "Interactive Sonification of Spreadsheets". ICAD '05. Limerick, Ireland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Oren, Michael; Harding, Chris; Bonebright, Terri (2008), Audio Platform Game (APG) Design for Players with Visual Impairments, to appear in Journal of Visual Impairment and BlindnessGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Oren, Michael; Harding, Chris; Bonebright, Terri (2007, June). "Speed Sonic Across the Span: A Platform Audio Game". Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Displays 2007. Montreal, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Walker, B. N. and Kramer, G. (2005, Oct). "Sonification design and metaphors: Comments on Walker and Kramer, ICAD 1996". ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 2, 4, 413--417. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Evaluation of spatial abilities within a 2D auditory platform game

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        Assets '08: Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
        October 2008
        332 pages
        ISBN:9781595939760
        DOI:10.1145/1414471

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 October 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader