skip to main content
10.1145/1452392.1452410acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Perception of dynamic audiotactile feedback to gesture input

Published:20 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present results of a study where perception of dynamic audiotactile feedback to gesture input was examined. Our main motivation was to investigate how users' active input and different modality conditions effect the perception of the feedback. The experimental prototype in the study was a handheld sensor-actuator device that responds dynamically to user's hand movements creating an impression of a virtual texture. The feedback was designed so that the amplitude and frequency of texture were proportional to the overall angular velocity of the device. We used four different textures with different velocity responses. The feedback was presented to the user by the tactile actuator in the device, by audio through headphones, or by both. During the experiments, textures were switched in random intervals and the task of the user was to detect the changes while moving the device freely. The performances of the users with audio or audiotactile feedback were quite equal while tactile feedback alone yielded poorer performance. The texture design didn't influence the movement velocity or periodicity but tactile feedback induced most and audio feedback the least energetic motion. In addition, significantly better performance was achieved with slower motion. We also found that significant learning happened over time; detection accuracy increased significantly during and between the experiments. The masking noise used in tactile modality condition did not significantly influence the detection accuracy when compared to acoustic blocking but it increased the average detection time.

References

  1. Ahmaniemi, T., Lantz V., Marila J.,2008. Dynamic Audiotactile Feedback in Gesture Interaction. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brown, L., Brewster, S., A., Purchase, H., C. 2005. A First Investigation into the Effectiveness of Tactons. Proceedings of WorldHaptics, Pisa, Italy. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dalton, B., Behm, D., 2007. Effects of noise and music on human and task performance: A systematic review Occupational Ergonomics, 7(3), 143--152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Goldin-Meadow, S. 2006. The Hand's Role in Talking and Thinking, Handbook pp. 336--369.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoggan, E., and Brewster, S. Designing Audio and Tactile Crossmodal Icons for Mobile Devices, 2006. Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, Nagoya, Japan. ACM Press, 162--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. http://www.gras.dk/00012/00058/00166/00344/, 13.5.2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jousmäki, V., and Hari, R. 1998, Parchment-skin illusion: sound--biased touch. Current Biology, 1998, 8(6) 190--191.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lederman, S.J., Klatzky, R.L., Martin, A. & Tong, C. 2003. Relative performance using haptic and/or touch-produced auditory cues in a remote absolute texture identification task. IEEE VR'03, 11th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 151--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mononen, K. 2007. The Effects of Augmented Feedback on Motor Skill Learning in Shooting, A Feedback Training Intervention among Inexperienced Rifle Shooters, Doctoral Thesis, University of Jyväskylä.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Norman, D., A. 1990. The Design of Everyday Things. Currency/Doubleday, New York. 9--12, 87--104.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Oakley, I., Park J., 2008. Did you feel something? Distracter tasks and recognition of vibrotactile cues. Interacting with Computers, 20(2008), 354--363. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Rath, M., and Rohs, M. 2006. Explorations in Sound for Tilting--based Interfaces. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Multimodal interfaces, Banff, Alberta, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Salminen, K., Surakka, V., Lylykangas, J., Raisamo, J., Saarinen, R., Raisamo, R., Rantala, J., and Evreinov, G. 2008. Emotional and Behavioral Responses to Haptic Stimulation. Proceeding of the twenty--sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Florence, Italy. ACM Press, NY, USA, 1555--1562. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Toivonen M, Rauno P., Savolainen S., Lehtomäki K. 2002. Noise Attenuation and Proper Insertion of Earplugs into Ear Canals. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 46 (6), 527--530, Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Williamson, J. and Murray-Smith, 2002. R. Audio feedback for gesture recognition. Technical Report, Department of Computing Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Perception of dynamic audiotactile feedback to gesture input

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICMI '08: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Multimodal interfaces
      October 2008
      322 pages
      ISBN:9781605581989
      DOI:10.1145/1452392

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 October 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader