skip to main content
10.1145/1452520.1452543acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ten years in the evolution of the internet ecosystem

Published:20 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Our goal is to understand the evolution of the Autonomous System (AS) ecosystem over the last decade. Instead of focusing on abstract topological properties, we classify ASes into a number of "species" depending on their function and business type. Further, we consider the semantics of inter-AS links, in terms of customer-provider versus peering relations. We find that the available historic datasets from RouteViews and RIPE are not sufficient to infer the evolution of peering links, and so we restrict our focus to customer-provider links. Our findings highlight some important trends in the evolution of the Internet over the last decade, and hint at what the Internet is heading towards. After an exponential increase phase until 2001, the Internet now grows linearly in terms of both ASes and inter-AS links. The growth is mostly due to enterprise networks and content/access providers at the periphery of the Internet. The average path length remains almost constant mostly due to the increasing multihoming degree of transit and content/access providers. In recent years, enterprise networks prefer to connect to small transit providers, while content/access providers connect equally to both large and small transit providers. The AS species differ significantly from each other with respect to their rewiring activity; content/access providers are the most active. A few large transit providers act as "attractors" or "repellers" of customers. For many providers, strong attractiveness precedes strong repulsiveness by 3-9 months. Finally, in terms of regional growth, we find that the AS ecosystem is now larger and more dynamic in Europe than in North America.

References

  1. R. Albert and A. L. Barabasi. Topology of Evolving Networks: Local Events and Universality. Physical Review Letters 85, 5234, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A. L. Barabasi and R. Albert. Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science 286 509512, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. T. Bu and D. Towsley. On Distinguishing Between Internet Power Law Topology Generators. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. M. Carlson and J. Doyle. Highly Optimized Tolerance: A Mechanism for Power Laws in Designed Systems. Physical Review E 60, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. H. Chang, S. Jamin, Z. M. Mao, and W. Willinger. An Empirical Approach to Modeling Inter-AS Traffic Matrices. In Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. H. Chang, S. Jamin, and W. Willinger. Internet Connectivity at the AS-level: An Optimization-Driven Modeling Approach. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Models, Methods and Tools for Reproducible Network Research (MoMeTools), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H. Chang, S. Jamin, and W. Willinger. To Peer or Not to Peer: Modeling the Evolution of the Internet's AS-Level Topology. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. H. Chang and W. Willinger. Difficulties Measuring the Internet's AS-Level Ecosystem. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Q. Chen, H. Chang, R. Govindan, S. Jamin, S. Shenker, and W. Willinger. The Origin of Power-Laws in Internet Topologies Revisited. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Cohen and D. Raz. The Internet Dark Matter - On the Missing Links in the AS Connectivity Map. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. X. Dimitropoulos, D. Krioukov, M. Fomenkov, Y. Hyun, K. Claffy, and G. Riley. AS Relationships: Inference and Validation. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. X. Dimitropoulos, D. Krioukov, G. Riley, and K. Claffy. Revealing the Autonomous System Taxonomy: The Machine Learning Approach. In Proceedings of Passive and Active Measurement Conference (PAM), 2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. N. Economides. The Economics of the Internet Backbone. Handbook of Telecommunications Economics Ed. S. Majumdar, I. Vogelsang, M. Cave. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishers, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Fabrikant, E. Koutsoupias, and C. H. Papadimitriou. Heuristically Optimized Trade-Offs: A New Paradigm for Power Laws in the Internet. In ICALP '02: Proceedings of the 29th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Faloutsos, P. Faloutsos, and C. Faloutsos. On Power-law Relationships of the Internet Topology. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. L. Gao. On Inferring Autonomous System Relationships in the Internet. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 9(6), 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. H. Haddadi, S. Uhlig, A. Moore, R. Mortier, and M. Rio. Modeling internet topology dynamics. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Y. He, G. Siganos, M. Faloutsos, and S. V. Krishnamurthy. A Systematic Framework for Unearthing the Missing Links: Measurements and Impact. In Proceedings of 4th USENIX/SIGCOMM NSDI, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. G. Huston. The 32-bit AS Number Report. http://www.potaroo.net/tools/asn32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. E. F. Keller. Revisiting "Scale-free" Networks. BioEssays 27, Wiley Periodicals Inc., 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D. Krioukov, kc claffy, M. Fomenkov, F. Chung, A. Vespignani, and W. Willinger. The Workshop on Internet Topology (WIT) Report. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Leskovec, J. Kleinberg, and C. Faloutsos. Graph Evolution: Densification and Shrinking Diameters. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (ACM TKDD), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. D. Magoni and J. J. Pansiot. Analysis of the Autonomous System Network Topology. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. P. Mahadevan, D. Krioukov, M. Fomenkov, B. Huffaker, X. Dimitropoulos, kc claffy, and A. Vahdat. The Internet AS-Level Topology: Three Data Sources and One Definitive Metric. ACM SIGCOMM CCR, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. W. B. Norton. The Evolution of the U.S. Internet Peering Ecosystem. Equinix white papers, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. R. Oliveira, D. Pei, W. Willinger, B. Zhang, and L. Zhang. In Search of the Elusive Ground Truth: The Internet's AS-level Connectivity Structure. In Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. R. V. Oliveira, B. Zhang, and L. Zhang. Observing the Evolution of Internet AS Topology. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. S. Park, D. M. Pennock, and C. L. Giles. Comparing Static and Dynamic Measurements and Models of the Internet's AS Topology. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. RIPE. RIPE Network Coordination Centre. http://www.ripe.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Routeviews. University of Oregon Route Views Project. http://www.routeviews.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. M. A. Serrano, M. Boguna, and A. D. Guilera. Modeling the Internet. The European Physics Journal B, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. G. Siganos, M. Faloutsos, and C. Faloutsos. The Evolution of the Internet: Topology and Routing. University of California, Riverside technical report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. L. Subramanian, S. Agarwal, J. Rexford, and R. Katz. Characterizing the Internet hierarchy from Multiple Vantage Points. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. H. Tangmunarunkit, J. Doyle, R. Govindan, W. Willinger S. Jamin, and S. Shenker. Does AS size Determine Degree in AS Topology? ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. X. Wang and D. Loguinov. Wealth-Based Evolution Model for the Internet AS-Level Topology. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. S. H. Yook, H. Jeong, and A. L. Barabasi. Modeling the Internet's Large-scale Topology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. B. Zhang, R. Liu, D. Massey, and L. Zhang. Collecting the Internet AS-level Topology. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Y. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z. M. Mao, C. Hu, and B. M. Maggs. On the Impact of Route Monitor Selection. In Proceedings ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. S. Zhou. Understanding the Evolution Dynamics of Internet Topology. Physical Review E, vol. 74, 2006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Ten years in the evolution of the internet ecosystem

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IMC '08: Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement
      October 2008
      352 pages
      ISBN:9781605583341
      DOI:10.1145/1452520

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 October 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate277of1,083submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader