skip to main content
10.1145/1473018.1473035acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social inclusion and creative expressions using non-digital artefacts: a case study on pinholes

Published:16 January 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Motivation -- The research aims to identify and analyse the relationships between social inclusion, sense of community and spaces through creative activities, exploiting the potential of low tech and "transparent" tools and their impact on the acquisition of social competencies, as well as on creative expression skills. In a long-term perspective, the study aims at exploring uses of ICT in art-based inclusion practices.

Research approach -- An explorative case study approach is used to investigate the potential of non-digital artefacts in supporting creative workshops involving migrants, local citizens, children, adults and elderly people.

Findings/Design -- The study provides evidence that social inclusion is related to the involvement of mixed groups of people in the community space. It highlights the role of non-digital artefact on the acquisition of social and creative competences: In the observed creative workshops, people learned about their local community; felt legitimized to express their views about it and to engage in its development. Participants learned about themselves and gained confidence, reinforcing their inclusion in the community. Both migrants and local people, youngsters and elders, overcame prejudices related to lack of understanding and gained empathy for other people's aspirations, contributions, and human potential.

Research limitations/Implications -- The presented results are based on a study that focused on non-digital artefact: pinhole camera, as a support for creative activity fostering social inclusion. Their implications for designing technology-enhanced environments will be investigated based on the results obtained.

Originality/Value -- The research makes a contribution to the need to design simple and federating tools in order to foster creative, joyful and mindful interactions between mixed groups of users.

Take away message -- Technological artefacts to be used in creative activities fostering social inclusion should allow mindful interactions and appreciation of community places and spaces.

References

  1. Ackermann, E., Chabert-Ramon, A., Decortis, F., Magli, R., Napoletano, L., & Owen, M. (2006). La piazza. Convivial spaces for intergenerational learning: what places for the digital age? Current developments in computer-assisted education, 3, pp. 1359--1363.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Auburn, T., & Barnes, R. (2006). Producing place: A neo-Schutzian perspective on the "psychology of place". Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 38--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Csikszntmihalyi, M. (2002). Flow. The classic work on how to achieve happiness. Auckland: Rider.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hernandez, B., Hidalgo, M., Salazar-Laplce, M., & Hess, S. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 310--319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Hutchins, E. (1990). The technology of team navigation. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut and C. Edigo, Intellectual Teamwork. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kiss, A. (1992). L'empathie et la rencontre interculturelle. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews, an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mannarini, T., Tartaglia, S., Fedi, A., & Greganti, K. (2006). Image of neighborhood, self-image and sense of community. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(3), 202--214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Manzo, L. C. (2005). For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 67--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Morgan, D. L., Krueger, R. A., & King, J. A. (1998). The focus group kit, Vols. 1--6. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Norman (1991). The invisible computer. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Twigger-Ross, C., & Uzzell, D. (1996). Place and identity processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 205--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Social inclusion and creative expressions using non-digital artefacts: a case study on pinholes

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ECCE '08: Proceedings of the 15th European conference on Cognitive ergonomics: the ergonomics of cool interaction
        January 2008
        205 pages
        ISBN:9781605583990
        DOI:10.1145/1473018

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 January 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate56of91submissions,62%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader