skip to main content
research-article

Path coverage by a sensor field: The nonhomogeneous case

Published:03 April 2009Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We analyze the statistical properties of the coverage of a one-dimensional path induced by a two-dimensional nonhomogeneous random sensor network. Sensor locations form a nonhomogeneous Poisson process and sensing area for the sensors are circles of random independent and identically distributed radii. We first characterize the coverage of a straight-line path by the nonhomogeneous one-dimensional Boolean model. We then obtain an equivalent Mt/Gt/∞, queue whose busy period statistics is the same as the coverage statistics of the line. We obtain k-coverage statistics for an arbitrary point and a segment on the x-axis. We provide upper and lower bounds on the probability of complete k-coverage of a segment. We illustrate all our results for the case of the sensor deployment having a “Laplacian” intensity function.

References

  1. de Silva, V., Ghrist, R., and Muhammad, A. 2005. Blind swarms for coverage in 2-d. In Proceeding of the Conference Robotics Systems and Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Eick, S., Massey, W. A., and Whitt, W. 1993a. Mt/G/∞ queues with sinusoidal arrival rates. Management Sci. 39, 241--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Eick, S., Massey, W. A., and Whitt, W. 1993b. The physics of Mt/G/∞ queue. Oper. Res. 41, 4, 731--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ghrist, R. and Muhammad, A. 2005. Coverage and hole detection in sensor networks via homology. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Green, L. and Kolesar, P. 1991. The pointwise stationary approximation for queues with nonstationary arrivals. Management Sci. 37, 84--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Grimmett, G. R. 1999. Percolation, 2nd ed. Vol. 321. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hall, P. 1988. Intoduction to the Theory of Coverage Process. John Wiley and Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kumar, S., Lai, T. H., and Balogh, J. 2004. On k-coverage in a mostly sleeping sensor network. In Proceedings of the ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networks. (MobiCom). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lazos, L. and Poovendran, R. 2006. Stochastic coverage in heterogeneous sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sensor Netw. 2, 3, 325--358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Li, X. Y., Wan, P. J., and Frieder, O. 2003. Coverage in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Comput. 52, 6, 753--763. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Liu, B. and Towsley, D. 2003. On the coverage and detectability of wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Conference on WiOpt'03 Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu, B. and Towsley, D. 2004. A study on the coverage of large-scale sensor networks. In 1st IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensors.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Megerian, S., Koushanfar, F., and Potkonjak, M. 2005. Worst and best-case coverage in sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 4, 84--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Meguerdichian, S., Koushanfar, F., Qu, G., and Potkonjak, M. 2001. Coverage problems in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Meguerdichian, S., Koushanfar, F., Qu, G., and Potkonjak, M. 2002. Exposure in wireless sensor networks: Theory and practical solutions. J. Wireless Netw. 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ram, S. S., Iyer, S. K., Manjunath, D., and Yogeshwaran, D. 2007. On the path coverage properties of random sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 6, 494--506. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ram, S. S., Manjunath, D., and Borkar, V. B. 2006. A note on busy period statistics for Mt/Gt/∞ queues. www.ifp.uiuc.edu/ssriniv5/Files/mtgt.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ross, S. M. 1996. Stochastic Processes, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ross, S. M. 2003. Introduction to Probability Models, 8th ed. Academic Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Shakkotai, S., Srikant, R., and Shroff, N. 2003. Unreliable sensor grids: Coverage, connectivity and diameter. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Stadje, W. 1989. Coverage problems for random intervals. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 49, 1538--1551. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Wan, P. J. and Yi, C. W. 2006. Coverage by randomly deployed wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 14, 2658--2669. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Whitt, W. 1991. The pointwise stationary approximation for Mt/Mt/s queues is asymptotically correct as the rates increase. Management Sci. 37, 307--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Path coverage by a sensor field: The nonhomogeneous case

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
      ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 5, Issue 2
      March 2009
      284 pages
      ISSN:1550-4859
      EISSN:1550-4867
      DOI:10.1145/1498915
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 April 2009
      • Revised: 1 June 2008
      • Accepted: 1 June 2008
      • Received: 1 September 2007
      Published in tosn Volume 5, Issue 2

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader