skip to main content
10.1145/1502650.1502668acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Context-based page unit recommendation for web-based sensemaking tasks

Published:08 February 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sensemaking tasks require that users gather and comprehend information from many sources to answer complex questions. Such tasks are common and include, for example, researching vacation destinations or performing market analysis. In this paper, we present an algorithm and interface which provides context-based page unit recommendation to assist in connection discovery during sensemaking tasks. We exploit the natural note-taking activity common to sensemaking behavior as the basis for a task-specific context model. Our algorithm then dynamically analyzes each web page visited by a user to determine which page units are most relevant to the user's task. We present the details of our recommendation algorithm, describe the user interface, and present the results of a user study which show the effectiveness of our approach.

References

  1. Clipmarks. http://www.clipmarks.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. Addison Wesley, Boston, MA, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. P. Bigham, A. C. Cavender, R. S. Kaminsky, C. M. Prince, and T. S. Robison. Transcendence: Enabling a personal view of the deep web. In Proc. of IUI, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. I. Dagan, L. Lee, and F. Pereira. Contextual word similarity and estimation from sparse data. Computer Speech and Language, 9:123--152, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. Domingue, M. Dzbor, and E. Motta. Magpie: Supporting browsing and navigation on the semantic web. In Proc. of IUI, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Dubinko, R. Kumar, J. Magnani, J. Novak, P. Raghavan, and A. Tomkins. Visualizing tags over time. In Proc. of Inter. WWW Conf., 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Ferragina and A. Gulli. A personalized search engine based on web-snippet hierarchical clustering. In Proc. of Inter. WWW Conf., 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Google Notebook. http://www.google.com/notebook/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Gotz. The scratchpad: Sensemaking support for the web. In Proc. of Inter. WWW Conf. Posters, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. Gotz, M. X. Zhou, and V. Aggarwal. Interactive visual synthesis of analytic knowledge. In IEEE VAST, Nov 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. D. Gotz, M. X. Zhou, and Z. Wen. A study of information gathering and result processing in intelligence analysis. In Proc of IUI Workshop on IUI for Intel Analysis, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Hammond, T. Hannay, B. Lund, and J. Scott. Social bookmarking tools: A general review. In Digital Library Magazine, volume 11. Nature Publishing Group, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. G. Hattori, K. Hoashi, K. Matsumoto, and F. Sugaya. Robust web page segmentation for mobile terminal using content-distances and page layout information. In Proc. of Inter. WWW Conf., May 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. i2 Incorporated. Analsyt's Notebook. www.i2inc.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. N. Jhaveri and K.-J. Raiha. The advantages of a cross-session web workspace. In Proc. of CHI, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Jiang and D. Conrath. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In Proc. of Inter. Conf. on Research on Computational Linguistics, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. A. W. Lazonder, H. J. A. Biemans, and I. G. J. H. Wopereis. Differences between novice and experienced users in searching information on the world wide web. Jrnl of the American Society for Info. Sci., 51:576--581, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mindjet Corporation. Mind Manager. http://www.mindjet.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. C. Olston and E. H. Chi. Scenttrails: Integrating browsing and searching on the web. ACM Trans. on CHI, 10, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. T. Pedersen, S. Patwardhan, and J. Michelizzi. Wordnet::similarity -- measuring the relatedness of concepts. In Proc. of the National Conf. of AI, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. P. Pirolli and S. Card. Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106:643--675, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. P. Pirolli and S. Card. The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis. In Inter. Conf. on Intel. Anal., 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. D. M. Russell, M. J. Stefik, P. Pirolli, and S. K. Card. The cost structure of sensemaking. In Proc. of CHI, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. G. Salton. Automatic Text Processing: the transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. G. Salton and M. J. McGill. Introductin to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. M. C. Schraefel, Y. Zhu, D. Modjeska, D. Wigdor, and S. Zhao. Hunter gatherer: Interaction support for the creation and management of within-web-page collections. In Proc. of Inter. WWW Conf., 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Y. B. Shrinivasan and J. J. van Wijk. Supporting the analytical reasoning process in information visualization. In Proc. of CHI, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. K. Sugiyama, K. Hatano, and M. Yoshikawa. Adaptive web search based on user profile constructed without any effort from users. In Proc. of Inter. WWW Conf., 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J. J. Thomas and K. A. Cook, editors. Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. IEEE Press, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Z. Wen, M. Zhou, and V. Aggarwal. Context-aware, adaptive information retrieval for investigative tasks. In Proc. of IUI, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. W. Wright, D. Schroh, P. Proulx, A. Skaburskis, and B. Cort. The sandbox for analysis -- concepts and methods. In Proc. of CHI, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Y. Yang and J. O. Pederson. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In Proc. of Inter. Conf. on Machine Learning, 1997 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Context-based page unit recommendation for web-based sensemaking tasks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IUI '09: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces
      February 2009
      522 pages
      ISBN:9781605581682
      DOI:10.1145/1502650

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 February 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader