skip to main content
10.1145/1508865.1508923acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring factors that influence computer science introductory course students to persist in the major

Published:04 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes an exploratory study to identify which environmental and student factors best predict intention to persist in the computer science major. The findings can be used to make decisions about initiatives for increasing retention. Eight indices of student characteristics and perceptions were developed using the research-based Student Experience of the Major Survey: student-student interaction; student-faculty interaction; collaborative learning opportunities; pace/workload/prior experience with programming; teaching assistants; classroom climate/pedagogy; meaningful assignments; and racism/sexism. A linear regression revealed that student-student interaction was the most powerful predictor of students' intention to persist in the major beyond the introductory course. Other factors predicting intention to persist were pace/workload/prior experience and male gender. The findings suggest that computer science departments interested in increasing retention of students set structured expectations for student-student interaction in ways that integrate peer involvement as a mainstream activity rather than making it optional or extracurricular. They also suggest departments find ways to manage programming experience gaps in CS1.

References

  1. Astin, A. W. (1977). Four critical years. Effects of college on beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student Involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297--308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Astin, A. W. (1991). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker, L. J. & Garvin-Doxas, K. (2004). Making visible the behaviors that influence learning environment: A qualitative exploration of computer science classrooms. Computer Science Education, 14(2), 119--145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Barker, L., Cohoon, J. M., & Schaefer, S. (2007). Student Experience of the Major Survey at a Glance. http://www.ncwit.org/pdf/SEM_AtaGlance.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Biggers, M., Brauer, A., and Yilmaz, T. (2008). Student perceptions of computer science: A retention study comparing graduating seniors with CS leavers. SIGCSE Bulletin ( 40) 1, 402--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cohoon, J. M. & Aspray, W. F. (2006). Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Correll, S. (2004). Constraints into preferences: Gender, status and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review (69)1, 93--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jagacinski, C. M., Lebold, W. K., & Salvendy, G. (1988). Gender Differences in Persistence in Computer-Related Fields. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(2), 185--202. Kuh, G. D., Schuh, J., Whitt, E. & Associates. (1991). Involving colleges. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jacobson, N. & Schaefer, S. (2008). Pair programming in CS1: Overcoming objections to its adoption. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin (40)2, 93--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. McDowell, C., Werner, L., Bullock, H., & Fernald J. (2006) Pair programming improves student retention, confidence, and program quality. Communications of the ACM (49)8, 90--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. National Center for Women & IT. (2007). NCWIT Scorecard: A report on the status of women in information technology. www.ncwit.org/pdf/2007_Scorecard_Web.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Peltier, J. W., Laden, R., & Matranga, M. (1999). Student persistence in college: A review of research. Journal of College Student Retention, 1(4), 357--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 50--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Strenta, A. C., Elliott, R., Adair, R., Matier, M., & Scott, J. (1994). Choosing and Leaving Science in Highly Selective Institutions. Research in Higher Education, 35(5), 513--547.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Tinto, V. (1994). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Weidman, J. (1989). Undergraduate socialization: A conceptual approach. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. New York: Agathon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Exploring factors that influence computer science introductory course students to persist in the major

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader