skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518897acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sizing the horizon: the effects of chart size and layering on the graphical perception of time series visualizations

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

We investigate techniques for visualizing time series data and evaluate their effect in value comparison tasks. We compare line charts with horizon graphs - a space-efficient time series visualization technique - across a range of chart sizes, measuring the speed and accuracy of subjects' estimates of value differences between charts. We identify transition points at which reducing the chart height results in significantly differing drops in estimation accuracy across the compared chart types, and we find optimal positions in the speed-accuracy tradeoff curve at which viewers performed quickly without attendant drops in accuracy. Based on these results, we propose approaches for increasing data density that optimize graphical perception.

References

  1. Beattie, V., Jones, M.J. The impact of graph slope on rate of change judgements in corporate reports. ABACUS, 38(2):177--199, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bertin, J. Sémiologie Graphique, Gauthier-Villars: Paris, 1967. English translation by W.J. Berg as Semiology of Graphics, University of Wisconsin Press: Madison, WI, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Byron, L., Wattenberg, M. Stacked Graphs - Geometry and Aesthetics. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Comp. Graphics, 14(6):1245--1252, Nov/Dec 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cleveland, W.S., Diaconis, P., McGill, R. Variables on Scatterplots Look More Highly Correlated When the Scales are Increased. Science, 216(4550):1138--1141, Jun 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cleveland, W.S., McGill, R. Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387):531--554, Sep 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Cleveland, W.S. Visualizing Information. Hobart Press. 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Few, S. Time on the Horizon. Visual Business Intelligence Newsletter, Jun/Jul 2008. Online at http://www.perceptualedge.com/articles/visual_business_intelligence/time_on_the_horizon.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gillan, D.J., Callahan, A.B. A Componential Model of Human Interaction with Graphs: VI. Cognitive Engineering of Pie Graphs. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 42(4):566--591. Winter 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Heer, J., Agrawala, M. Multi-Scale Banking to 45°. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Comp. Graphics, 12(5):701--708, Sep/Oct 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Heer, J., Viégas, F., Wattenberg, M. Voyagers and Voyeurs: Supporting Asynchronous Collaborative Information Visualization. Proc. ACM CHI, pp. 1029--1038, Apr 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Heer, J., Robertson, G. Animated Transitions in Statistical Data Graphics. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Comp. Graphics, 13(6):1240--1247, Nov/Dec 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Keim, D.A. Designing Pixel-Oriented Visualization Techniques: Theory and Applications. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Comp. Graphics, 6(1):59--78, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lam, H., Munzer, T., Kincaid, R. Overview Use in Multiple Visual Information Resolution Interfaces. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Comp. Graphics, 13(6):1278--1285, Nov/Dec 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lewandowsky, S., Spence, I. Discriminating Strata in Scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(407):682--688, Sep 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lohse, J. A. Cognitive Model for the Perception and Understanding of Graphs. Proc. ACM CHI, pp. 137--144, Apr/May 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mackinlay, J.D. Automating the Design of Graphical Presentations of Relational Information. ACM Trans. on Graphics, 5(2):110--141, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mackinlay, J.D., Hanrahan, P., Stolte, C. Show Me: Automatic Presentation for Visual Analysis. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Comp. Graphics. 13(6):1137--1144, Nov/Dec 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Palmer, S. Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. MIT Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Robertson, G., Fernandez, R., Fisher, D., Lee, B., Stasko, J. Effectiveness of Animation in Trend Visualization. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Comp. Graphics, 14(6):1325--1332, Nov/Dec 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rosling, H. TED 2006, http://gapminder.org/video/talks/ ted-2006-debunking-myth-about-the-third-world.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Saito, T., Miyamura H.N., Yamamoto, M., Saito,H., Hoshiya, Y., Kaseda, T. Two-Tone Pseudo-Coloring: Compact Visualization for One-Dimensional Data. Proc. IEEE InfoVis, pp. 173--180, Oct 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Shneiderman, B. Tree visualization with tree-maps: 2-d space-filling approach. ACM Trans. on Graphics, 11(1):92--99, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Simkin, D., Hastie, R. An Information-Processing Analysis of Graph Perception. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(398):454--465, Jun 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Spence, I., Lewandowsky, S. Displaying proportions and percentages. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5:61--77, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Stasko, J., Zhang, E. Focus+Context Display and Navigation Techniques for Enhancing Radial, Space-Filling Hierarchy Visualizations. Proc. IEEE InfoVis, pp. 57--65, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Tremmel, L. The Visual Separability of Plotting Symbols in Scatterplots. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 4(2):101--112, Jun 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Tufte, E. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Tufte, E. Beautiful Evidence. Graphics Press, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Wattenberg, M., Kriss, J. Designing for Social Data Analysis. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Comp. Graphics. 12(4):549--557, Jul/Aug 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Wigdor, D., Shen, C., Forlines, C., Balakrishnan, R. Perception of Elementary Graphical Elements in Tabletop and Multi-Surface Environments. Proc. ACM CHI, pp. 473--482, Apr 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Woodruff, A., Landay, J., Stonebraker, M. Constant Information Density Visualizations of Non-Uniform Distributions of Data. Proc. ACM UIST, pp. 19--28, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Sizing the horizon: the effects of chart size and layering on the graphical perception of time series visualizations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader