skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518916acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The "Beauty Dilemma": beauty is valued but discounted in product choice

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The empirical study of aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is concerned with - among other topics - the relationship between beauty and usability and the general impact of beauty on product choice and use. Specifically, the present paper explores the notion of a "beauty dilemma" - the idea that people discount beauty in a choice situation, although they value it in general (i.e., they are not choosing what makes them happy). We explored this idea in three studies with a total of over 600 participants. Study 1 revealed a reluctance to pay for beauty due to its hedonic nature (i.e., associated with luxury etc.). Study 2 showed that people prefer a more beautiful product, but justify their choice by referring to spurious advantages in usability. Finally, Study 3 revealed that a choice situation which requires a trade-off between beauty and usability, and which offers no further way to justify choosing beauty, leads to a sharp increase in the preference of usability. The underlying reasons for this "beauty dilemma" and further implications are discussed.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

1518916.mp4

mp4

342.3 MB

References

  1. Bloch, P.H., Brunel, F.F. and Arnold, T.J. Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement. Journal of Consumer Research 29 (2003), 551--556.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Böhm, G. and Pfister, H.-R. Instrumental or Emotional Evaluations: What determines preferences? Acta Psychologica, 93 (1996), 135--148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Diefenbach, S. and Hassenzahl, M. Give Me a Reason. Hedonic Product Choice and Justification. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 3051--3056. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Green, P.E. and Srinivasan, V. Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments With Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Marketing, 54, 4 (1990), 3--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hassenzahl, M. Aesthetics in interactive products: Correlates and consequences of beauty. In H.N.J. Schifferstein and P. Hekkert (Eds.) Product experience. Elsevier, San Diego, CA (2008), 287--302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Horowitz, J. and McConnell, K.E. A review of WTA/WTP studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 (2002), 426--447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hsee, C. and Hastie, R. Decision and experience: why don't we choose what makes us happy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2006), 31--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hsee, C., Zhang, J., Yu, F. and Xi, Y. Lay Rationalism and Inconsistency between Predicted Experience and Decision. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 16 (2003), 257--272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kivetz, R. and Simonson, I. Earning the right to indulge: Effort as determinant of customer preferences toward frequency program rewards. Journal of Marketing Research 39 (2002), 155--170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kivetz, R. and Simonson, I. Self-control for the Righteous: Toward a Theory to Precommitment to Indulge. Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (2002), 199--217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C. and Brown, J. Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression. Behavior&Information Technology, 25 (2006), 115--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Norman, D. Emotional Design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. O'Curry, S. and Strahilevitz, M. Probability and mode of acquisition effects on choices between hedonic and utilitarian options. Marketing Letters 12, 1 (2000), 37--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Okada, E.M. Justification Effects on Consumer Choice of Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods. Journal of Marketing Research 42 (2005), 43--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Russell, J. A. Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110 (2003), 145--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Sayman, S. and Önculer, A. Effects of study design characteristics on the WTA-TWP disparity: A meta-analytical framework. Journal of Economic Psychology 26 (2005), 289--312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Strahilevitz, M. and Myers, J.G. Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You Are Trying to Sell. Journal of Consumer Research 24 (1998), 434--446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Tractinksy, N., Cokhavi, A., Kirschenbaum, M. and Sharfi, T. Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web-pages. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 (2006), 1071--1083. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.Tractinsky, N., Katz, A.S. and Ikar, D. What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers 13 (2000), 127--145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Tractinsky, N. and Lowengart, O. Web-store aesthetics in e-retailing: A conceptual framework and some theoretical implications. Academy of Marketing Science Review 11, (2007) {online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Tractinsky, N. and Zmiri, D. Exploring attributes of skins as potential antecedents of emotion in HCI. In: P. Fishwick (Ed), Aesthetic Computing. MIT Press (2005), 805--821.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, M., Hassenzahl, M., Platz. A. Dynamics of user experience: How the perceived quality of mobile phones changes over time. In E. Law, Hvannberg, E. and Hassenzahl, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop Towards a Unified View of UX, in conjunction with NordiCHI 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The "Beauty Dilemma": beauty is valued but discounted in product choice

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader