skip to main content
10.1145/1520340.1520744acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Age matters: bridging the generation gap through technology-mediated interaction

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Internet-based, mobile and pervasive technologies provide the means for older people to establish and maintain intergenerational relationships over long distances. However the significance of this intergenerational context has been largely ignored when considering potential interactions and the design of new technologies. This workshop aims to explore what the important issues are when considering intergenerational contact as a significant context for design. The overarching objective of this workshop is to identify key research themes in respect of intergenerational communication and its implications for the design of interactive systems.

References

  1. Chadwick-Dias, A., Tedesco, D. P. and Tullis, T., S. (2004) Older adults and web usability: is web experience the same as web expertise ? CHI Extended Abstracts 2004, 1391--1394. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Chow, M. (1999) World Wide Wrinklenet. New Scientist, February 22, 1999. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg16121746.100-world-wide-wrinklenet.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Coleman, R. (2001) Living longer: the new context for design. Design Council, London. Available from http://www.education.edean.org/pdf/Intro033.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Coyne, K., and Nielsen, J. (2002) Web Usability for Senior Citizens: 46 Design Guidelines Based on Usability Studies with People Age 65 and Older, Nielsen Norman Group Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis, H., Vetere, F., Francis, P., Gibbs, M. and Howard, S. (2008) I Wish We Could Get Together: Exploring Intergenerational Play across a Distance via a Magic Box, Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 6(2), 191--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Fokkema, T. & Knipscheer, K. (2007) Escape loneliness by going digital: A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of a Dutch experiment in using ECT to overcome loneliness among older adults. Aging & Mental Health, September 2007; 11(5), 496--504.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gemperle, F., Disalvo, C., Forlizzi, J., and Yonkers, K., (2005) The Hug: a new form for communication. In Proc. DUX 2005, November 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Giles, L.C., Glonek, G.F.V, Luszcz, M.A. and Andrews, G.R. (2005) Effect of social networks on 10 year survival in very old Australians: the Australian longitudinal study of aging. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 59 (2005), 574--579.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Gonzalez, V. and Kurniawan Sri. (2008) On new media for intergenerational communication: The case of Geriatric1927". In Proc. ISTAS 2008, Fredericton, Canada 25--28 June 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Harley, D. and Fitzpatrick, G. (2008) YouTube and Intergenerational Communication: The case of Geriatric1927. Universal Access in the Information Society. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-008-0127-y Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Harwood, J and Lin, M.C. (2000) Affiliation, pride, exchange and distance in grandparents' account of relationship with their college--age grandchildren. Journal of Communication 50, 3 (2000), 31--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Hutchinson, H., Hansen, H., Roussel, N., Eiderbäck, B.,Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B., Druin, A.,Plaisant, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Conversy, S., and Evans, H. (2003). Technology Probes: Inspiring Design For and With Families. In Proc. CHI 2003 (Ft Lauderdale, FL), 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kanayama, T. (2003) Ethnographic research on the experience of Japanese elderly people online. New Media & Society 5, 2 (2003), 267--288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. McCarthy, H. and Thomas, G. (2004) Home Alone. London: Demos.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Quadrello, T., Hurme, H., et al. (2005). Grandparents use of new communication technologies in a European perspective. European Journal of Ageing 2(3): 200--207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Silverstein, M. and Bengston, V. L. (1993) Intergenerational Solidarity and the Structure of Adult Child-Parent Relationships in American Families. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 429--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. United Nations (2007) World Economic and Social Survey 2007:Development in an Ageing World. New York: United Nations. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/policy/wess/wess2007files/wess2007.pdf {Accessed 10th October 2007}Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Vanderbeck, R., M. (2007) Intergenerational Geographies: Age Relations, Segregation and Re--engagements. Geography Compass 1(2), 200--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Williams, A. and Nussbaum, J. F. (2001) Intergenerational Communication Across the Lifespan. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Wright, K. (2000) Computer-Mediated Social Support, Older Adults, and Coping. Journal of Communication, Summer 2000, 100--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Age matters: bridging the generation gap through technology-mediated interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '09: CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2470 pages
      ISBN:9781605582474
      DOI:10.1145/1520340

      Copyright © 2009 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • tutorial

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '09 Paper Acceptance Rate385of1,130submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader