skip to main content
10.1145/1529282.1529446acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Global-to-local representation and visualization of molecular surfaces using deformable models

Published:08 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Macromolecules such as proteins and enzymes are responsible for most of cellular functionality. Many molecular interactions, such as protein-protein interactions or protein-ligand binding, occur at what can be defined as the molecular surface. The topology of the molecular surface is often complex, containing various geometric features such as clefts, cavities, tunnels, and flat regions. These geometric features coupled with non-geometric physicochemical properties influence surface-based molecular interactions. Consequently analysis of molecular surfaces is crucial in elucidating structure-property relationships of molecules. In this paper we propose a method for visualizing a molecular surface in a manner that preserves and elucidates salient features. The method involves mapping of a molecular surface to a standard spherical coordinate system. The ability to map arbitrary molecular surfaces to a standard coordinate system aids in comparison of surface features across different molecules. The mapping is accomplished by enclosing the molecular surface by a sphere, and then iteratively deforming the sphere until it converges by wrapping the entire molecular surface. This allows a one-to-one relationship to be established between points on the molecular surface and points on the surface of the sphere. The presence of discontinuities such as tunnels in the molecular surface can be identified by detecting collision between patches of the deforming sphere. Subsequently, the deformable surface is restored back to the sphere, retaining the mapping. Features and properties defined at the molecular surface are then mapped and visualized in the standard spherical coordinate system. The proposed approach has several key advantages. First, it allows a global-to-local visualization of molecular surfaces. Second, it facilitates comparison of specific features as well as collection of features within and across molecules by mapping them to a common coordinate system. Third, the method allows visualization of both geometric and non-geometric surface properties. Fourth, specific molecular characteristics can be visualized individually or in combination on-demand. Finally, and crucially the advantages offered by the proposed visualization do not involve simplification of the surface characteristics thereby ensuring that no loss of potentially important information occurs.

References

  1. N. A. Baker, D. Sept, S. Joseph, M. J. Holst, and J. A. McCammon. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. National Academy of Sciences, 98(18): 10037--10041, Aug 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. H. M. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I. N. Shindyalov, P. E. Bourne: The Protein Data Bank, Nucleic Acids Research, 28 pp. 235--242 (2000).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. T. Binkowski, L. Adamian, and J. Liang, "Inferring functional relationships of proteins from local sequence and spatial surface patterns", J. Mol. Biol., 2003, 332: 505--526Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J. F. Blinn, "Simulation of Wrinkled Surfaces", Computer Graphics, Vol. 12 (3), pp. 286--292 SIGGRAPH-ACM (August 1978) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. Cipriano and M. Gleicher, 2007. Molecular Surface Abstraction. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 6 (Nov. 2007), 1608--1615. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. L. Connolly, Analytical molecular surface calculation. Applied Crystallography 16 (1983), 548--558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. F. Ferre et al., "SURFACE: a database of protein surface regions for functional annotation", Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, Vol 32: D240--D244Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. T. Goddard, C. Huang, and T. Ferrin, "Software Extensions to UCSF Chimera for Interactive Visualization of Large Molecular Assemblies", Structure 13: 473--482, 2005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. B. Huang and M. Schroeder, "Ligsite: Predicting Ligand Binding Sites Using the Connolly Surface and Degree of Conservation", BMC Structural Biology, 6: 19, 2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos, "Snakes - Active Contour Models" International Journal of Computer Vision, 1(4): 321--331, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. R. A. Laskowski, SURFNET: A Program for Visualizing Molecular Surfaces, Cavities, and Intermolecular Interactions. J. Mol. Graph., 13: 323--330, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. B. Li et al. "Characterization of local geometry of protein surfaces with the visibility criterion", Proteins 71: 670--683, 2008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J Liang, H. Edelsbrunner, C. Woodward, "Anatomy of Protein Pockets and Cavities: Measurement of Binding Site Geometry and Implications for Ligand Design", Protein Sci, 7: 1884--1897, 1998Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. T. McInerney and D. Terzopolous. A Dynamic Finite Element Surface Model for Segmentation and Tracking in Multidimensional Medical Images with Application to Cardiac 4D Image Analysis. Comput Med Imag Graph, vol. 19, pp. 69--83, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. K. Pawlowski and A. Godzik, "Surface Map Comparison: studying Function Diversity of Homologous Proteins", J. Mol. Biol., 2001, 309: 793--806Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. F. M. Richards, "Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure," Annual Review of Biophysics and Bioengineering, 6, 1977, pp. 151--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. R. Singh, Surface Similarity-Based Molecular Query-Retrieval, BMC Cell-Biology, Vol. 8, Suppl. 1 (S6): July, 2007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Sanner, "A Component-Based Software Environment for Visualizing Large Macromolecular Assemblies", Structure 3(3): 447--462, 2005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. J. Sasin, A. Godzik, and J. Bujnicki, "Surf's Up! -- Protein Classification by Surface Comparison", J. Biosci., 32(1), pp 97--100, 2007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. S. Schmitt, D. Kuhn, and G. Klebe, "A new method to detect related function among proteins independent of sequence and fold homology", J. Mol. Biol., 2002, 323: 387--406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Y. Tsuchiya, K. Kinoshita, and H. Nakamura, "Structure-based prediction of DNA-binding sites on proteins using the empirical preference of electrostatic potential and the shape of molecular surfaces", PROTEINS: structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 55: 885--894, 2004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. X. Zhang and C. Bajaj, "Extraction, Visualization and Quantification of Protein Pockets", Proceeding of 6th annual International Conference on Computational System Bioinformatics Conference (CSB 2007), p. 275--286, San Diego, CA, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Global-to-local representation and visualization of molecular surfaces using deformable models

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                SAC '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM symposium on Applied Computing
                March 2009
                2347 pages
                ISBN:9781605581668
                DOI:10.1145/1529282

                Copyright © 2009 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 8 March 2009

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader