ABSTRACT
Information systems often require combining datasets available in different formats, and geographical information systems are no exception. While semantic technologies have been used before to enable interoperability between relational databases, little research has yet been done for the special case of geographical information systems, despite their applications in active areas of research such as location-based services. In this paper we present an OWL-based system for seamless conversion between geographical file formats. While implementing this system we reached the complexity limits of current description logics reasoners and had to design custom algorithms to compute the logical inferences we needed. This process suggested interesting approaches to enable scalable reasoning on the semantic web.
- Acciarri A., Calvanese D., De Giacomo G., Lembo D., Lenzerini M., Palmieri M., Rosati R.: QuOnto: Querying Ontologies. In Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2005) Google ScholarDigital Library
- Additional Military Layer Specification -- http://www.ukho.gov.uk/content/addAttachments/AML/Prod uction%20Specs/AML_Production_Spec_1.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Allen, J. F. 1983. Maintaining Knowledge About Temporal Intervals. In Communications of the ACM Volume 26, Issue 11 (November 1983), 832--843. ACM New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aufaure M. A., Baazaoui H., Ben Ghezala H., Claramunt C., Hadjouni M., Towards a personalized spatial web architecture. Workshop "Semantic Web meets Geospatial Applications", held in conjunction with AGILE 2008, 11th International Conference on Geographic Information Science, May 5th 2008.Google Scholar
- Buccella A., Cechich A., Towards Integration of Geographic Information Systems. Second International Workshop on Views On Designing Complex Architectures, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007, 45--59. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Calvanese D., De Giacomo G., Lembo D., Lenzerini M., Rosati R., Data Complexity of Query Answering in Description Logics, In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'06), AAAI Press, 2006, 260--270.Google Scholar
- Cohn A. Cui Z., Randell D., A Spatial Logic based on Regions and Connection. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'92). AAAI Press, 1992, 165--176.Google Scholar
- Defne Z., Islam A. and Piasecki M. Ontology for Geography Markup Language (GML3.0) of Open GIS Consortium (OGC). http://loki.cae.drexel.edu/~wbs/ontology/2004/09/ogc-gml.owl, 2004.Google Scholar
- Deng D., Lemmens R., "Web 2.0 and Semantic Web: Clarifying the meaning of spatial features", Semantic Web meets Geospatial Applications Workshop, held in conjunction with AGILE 2008, 11th International Conference on Geographic Information Science, May 5th, 2008.Google Scholar
- Dutta S. 1990. Qualitative spatial reasoning: A semiquantitative approach using fuzzy logic. In Design and Implementation of Large Spatial Databases. Springer Berlin, 1990, 345--364. Google ScholarDigital Library
- ESRI Shapefile Technical Description -- http://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/shapefile.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Fonseca F. T., Egenhofer M. J., Ontology-driven geographic information systems, The University of Maine, 2001Google Scholar
- GML Spec -- http://www.opengespatial.org/standards/gmlGoogle Scholar
- Hakimpour, F., Using Ontologies to Resolve Semantic Heterogeneity for Integrating Spatial Database Schemata, Ph.D. thesis, Zurich University, 2003.Google Scholar
- Horrocks I., Using an Expressive Description Logic: FaCT or Fiction? In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference On Principles Of Knowledge Representation And Reasoning. (1998) 636--647Google Scholar
- Ionic WFS -- http://www.ionicsoft.comGoogle Scholar
- Kashyap V., Illarramendi A., Mena E., Sheth A. P., Observer: An approach for query processing in global information systems based on interoperation across preexisting ontologies, Distributed and Parallel Databases, 2000, 223--271. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Luciad WFS -- http://www.luciad.comGoogle Scholar
- National Geo-Spatial Intelligence Agency -- Vector Product Format Overview -- http://www.nga.mil/portal/site/nga01/index.jsp?epi-content=GENERIC&itemID=a2986591e1b3af00VgnVCMS erver23727a95RCRD&beanID=1629630080&viewID=ArticleGoogle Scholar
- OWL 1.1 -- http://www.webont.org/owl/1.1/Google Scholar
- Safe Software -- Feature Manipulation Engine -- http://www.safe.com/products/fmeGoogle Scholar
- S-57 -- IHO Transfer Standard for Digital Hydrographic Data -- http://www.iho-ohi.net/english/standards-publications/catalogue.html#S57Google Scholar
- Vector Product Format Overview -- http://www.nga.mil/portal/site/nga01/index.jsp?epi-content=GENERIC&itemID=a2986591e1b3af00VgnVCMServer23727a95RCRD&beanID=1629630080&viewID=ArticleGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Leveraging OWL for GIS interoperability: rewards and pitfalls
Recommendations
Interoperability results for Semantic Web technologies using OWL as the interchange language
Using Semantic Web technologies in complex scenarios requires that such technologies correctly interoperate by interchanging ontologies using the RDF(S) and OWL languages. This interoperability is not straightforward because of the high heterogeneity in ...
OWL rules: A proposal and prototype implementation
Although the OWL Web Ontology Language adds considerable expressive power to the Semantic Web it does have expressive limitations, particularly with respect to what can be said about properties. We present the Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL), a Horn ...
Interoperability of XML Schema Applications with OWL Domain Knowledge and Semantic Web Tools
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2007: CoopIS, DOA, ODBASE, GADA, and ISAbstractSeveral standards are expressed using XML Schema syntax, since the XML is the default standard for data exchange in the Internet. However, several applications need semantic support offered by domain ontologies and semantic Web tools like logic-...
Comments