skip to main content
research-article

How well do line drawings depict shape?

Published:27 July 2009Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper investigates the ability of sparse line drawings to depict 3D shape. We perform a study in which people are shown an image of one of twelve 3D objects depicted with one of six styles and asked to orient a gauge to coincide with the surface normal at many positions on the object's surface. The normal estimates are compared with each other and with ground truth data provided by a registered 3D surface model to analyze accuracy and precision. The paper describes the design decisions made in collecting a large data set (275,000 gauge measurements) and provides analysis to answer questions about how well people interpret shapes from drawings. Our findings suggest that people interpret certain shapes almost as well from a line drawing as from a shaded image, that current computer graphics line drawing techniques can effectively depict shape and even match the effectiveness of artist's drawings, and that errors in depiction are often localized and can be traced to particular properties of the lines used. The data collected for this study will become a publicly available resource for further studies of this type.

References

  1. Agrawala, M., Phan, D., Heiser, J., Haymaker, J., Klingner, J., Hanrahan, P., and Tversky, B. 2003. Designing effective step-by-step assembly instructions. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3, 828--837. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Belhumeur, P. N., Kriegman, D. J., and Yuille, A. L. 1999. The bas-relief ambiguity. Int. Journal of Computer Vision 35, 1, 33--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Caniard, F., and Fleming, R. W. 2007. Distortion in 3d shape estimation with changes in illumination. In ACM Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV) 2007, 99--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cole, F., Decarlo, D., Finkelstein, A., Kin, K., Morley, K., and Santella, A. 2006. Directing gaze in 3D models with stylized focus. Eurographics Symposium on Rendering (June), 377--387. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cole, F., Golovinskiy, A., Limpaecher, A., Barros, H. S., Finkelstein, A., Funkhouser, T., and Rusinkiewicz, S. 2008. Where do people draw lines? ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Debevec, P. 1998. Rendering synthetic objects into real scenes. In SIGGRAPH 1998, 189--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. DeCarlo, D., and Rusinkiewicz, S. 2007. Highlight lines for conveying shape. In NPAR 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. DeCarlo, D., Finkelstein, A., Rusinkiewicz, S., and Santella, A. 2003. Suggestive contours for conveying shape. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3, 848--855. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. DeCarlo, D., Finkelstein, A., and Rusinkiewicz, S., 2004. Interactive rendering of suggestive contours with temporal coherence. In NPAR 2004, 15--145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fleming, R. W., Torralba, A., and Adelson, E. H. 2004. Specular reflections and the perception of shape. Journal of Vision 4, 9, 798--820.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Fulvio, J. M., Singh, M., and Maloney, L. T. 2006. Combining achromatic and chromatic cues to transparency. Journal of Vision 6, 8, 760--776.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Gooch, B., Reinhard, E., and Gooch, A. 2004. Human facial illustrations: Creation and psychophysical evaluation. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 1, 27--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hertzmann, A., and Zorin, D. 2000. Illustrating smooth surfaces. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, 517--526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Interrante, V., Fuchs, H., and Pizer, S. 1995. Enhancing transparent skin surfaces with ridge and valley lines. In Proceedings of Vis 1995, IEEE Computer Society, 52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Isenberg, T., Neumann, P., Carpendale, S., Sousa, M. C., and Jorge, J. A. 2006. Non-photorealistic rendering in context: an observational study. In NPAR 2006, 115--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Judd, T., Durand, F., and Adelson, E. H. 2007. Apparent ridges for line drawing. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3, 19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kaplan, M., and Cohen, E. 2006. Producing models from drawings of curved surfaces. In Eurographics Workshop on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling, 51--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A., and Kappers, A. 1992. Surface perception in pictures. Perception and Psychophysics 52, 487--496.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A., Christou, C., and Lappin, J. 1996. Shape constancy in pictorial relief. Perception 25, 155--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A., Kappers, A. M., and Todd, J. T. 2001. Ambiguity and the 'mental eye' in pictorial relief. Perception 30, 431--448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Koenderink, J. J. 1984. What does the occluding contour tell us about solid shape? Perception 13, 321--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Kolomenkin, M., Shimshoni, I., and Tal, A. 2008. Demarcating curves for shape illustration. ACM Transactions on Graphics 27, 5 (Dec.), 157:1--157:9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Langer, M. S., and Bülthoff, H. H. 2001. A prior for global convexity in local shape-from-shading. Perception 30, 4, 403--410.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Lee, Y., Markosian, L., Lee, S., and Hughes, J. F. 2007. Line drawings via abstracted shading. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3, 18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Malik, J. 1987. Interpreting line drawings of curved objects. International Journal of Computer Vision 1, 1, 73--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Mamassian, P., and Landy, M. S. 1998. Observer biases in the 3d interpretation of line drawings. Vision Research 38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Markosian, L., Kowalski, M. A., Goldstein, D., Trychin, S. J., Hughes, J. F., and Bourdev, L. D. 1997. Real-time nonphotorealistic rendering. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1997, 415--420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Mitchell, J. L., Francke, M., and Eng, D. 2007. Illustrative rendering in Team Fortress 2. In NPAR 2007, 19--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Ohtake, Y., Belyaev, A., and Seidel, H.-P. 2004. Ridgevalley lines on meshes via implicit surface fitting. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. O'Shea, J. P., Banks, M. S., and Agrawala, M. 2008. The assumed light direction for perceiving shape from shading. In ACM Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV) 2008, 135--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Pauly, M., Keiser, R., and Gross, M. 2003. Multi-scale feature extraction on point-sampled surfaces. Computer Graphics Forum 22, 3 (Sept.), 281--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Phillips, F., Todd, J. T., Koenderink, J. J., and Kappers, A. M. 2003. Perceptual representation of visible surfaces. Perception and Psychophysics 65, 5, 747--762.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Saito, T., and Takahashi, T. 1990. Comprehensible rendering of 3-d shapes. In SIGGRAPH 1990, 197--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Santella, A., and DeCarlo, D. 2004. Visual interest and NPR: an evaluation and manifesto. In NPAR 2004, 71--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Thirion, J.-P., and Gourdon, A. 1996. The 3d marching lines algorithm. Graphical Models and Image Processing 58, 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Todd, J. T., Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., and Kappers, A. M. 1996. Effects of changing viewing conditions on the perceived structure of smoothly curved surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22, 695--706.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Wallraven, C., Bülthoff, H. H., Cunningham, D. W., Fischer, J., and Bartz, D. 2007. Evaluation of real-world and computer-generated stylized facial expressions. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 4, 3, 16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Waltz, D. L. 1975. Understanding line drawings of scenes with shadows. In The Psychology of Computer Vision, P. Winston, Ed. McGraw-Hill, 19--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Willats, J. 1997. Art and Representation: New Principles in the Analysis of Pictures. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Winnemöller, H., Feng, D., Gooch, B., and Suzuki, S. 2007. Using NPR to evaluate perceptual shape cues in dynamic environments. In NPAR 2007, 85--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. How well do line drawings depict shape?

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in

                Full Access

                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Transactions on Graphics
                  ACM Transactions on Graphics  Volume 28, Issue 3
                  August 2009
                  750 pages
                  ISSN:0730-0301
                  EISSN:1557-7368
                  DOI:10.1145/1531326
                  Issue’s Table of Contents

                  Copyright © 2009 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 27 July 2009
                  Published in tog Volume 28, Issue 3

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • research-article

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader