Christopher Plaue
John Stasko
ABSTRACT
Relatively little is known about how the presence and location of multiple shared displays changes the performance and dynamics of teams collaborating. We conducted a case study evaluating several shared display configurations with groups collaborating on a data-intensive, sense-making task. Teams completed the same task using either a single display, side-by-side dual, or opposing dual shared displays. The location of the second shared display significantly impacted the ability for teams to make logical connections amongst the data. Users were also significantly more satisfied with the collaboration process using the side-by-side dual display condition than those using a single display.
- Biehl, J.T. and Bailey, B.P. Improving interfaces for managing applications in multiple-device environments. In Proc. of AVI, ACM Press (2006), 35--42. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Biehl, J.T., Baker, W.T., Bailey, B.P., Tan, D.S., Inkpen, K.M, and Czerwinski, M. IMPROMPTU: a new interaction framework for supporting collaboration in multiple display environments and its field evaluation for co-located software development. In Proc. CHI 08, ACM Press (2008), 939--948 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bui, T., Sivasankaran, T.R. Relation between GDSS use and group task complexity: an experimental study. IEEE HICSS, (1990) 69--78Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cassell, J. A framework for gesture generation and interpretation. Computer Vision in Human-Machine Interaction, Cambridge University Press (1998), 191--215.Google Scholar
- Czerwinski, M., Smith, G., Regan, T., Meyers, B., Robertson, G., and Starkweather, G. Toward characterizing the productivity benefits of very large displays. In Proc. INTERACT 03, IOS Press (2003), 9--16.Google Scholar
- Davenport, T.H. Thinking for a living: how to get better performance and results from knowledge workers. HBS Press Book, 2005.Google Scholar
- DeSanctis, G. and Gallupe, R.B. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33(5), 1987, 589--609. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fjermestad, J., and Hiltz, S.R. An assessment of group support systems experimental research: methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(3), 1998, 7--149. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fussell, S., Setlock, L.D., Yang, J., Ou, J., Mauer, E., & Kramer, A.D. Gestures over video streams to support remote collaboration on physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 2004, 273--309. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gallupe, R.B., DeSanctis, G., Dickson, G.W. Computer-based support for group problem-finding: an experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly, 12(2), 1988, 276--297. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grudin, J. Partitioning digital worlds: focal and peripheral awareness in multiple monitor use. In Proc. CHI 2001, ACM Press (2001), 458--465. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guimbretiere, F., Stone, M., & Winograd, T. Fluid interaction with high-resolution wall-sized displays. In Proc. of UIST '01, Publisher (2001), 21--30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hutchings, D.R., Smith, G., Meyers, B., Czerwinski, M., and Robertson, G. Display space usage and window management operation comparisons between single monitor and multiple monitor users. In Proc. AVI, ACM Press (2004), 32--39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hutchins, E. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (1995).Google Scholar
- Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Dickson, G.W. Bonanza Business Forms Company: a mystery in declining profits. In Marketing Decision Making, Ruppel, A.C, O'Dell, W., Trent, R., Kehoe, W (eds), 1988.Google Scholar
- Johanson, B., Fox, A., Winograd, T. The Interactive Workspaces Project: experiences with ubiquitous computing rooms. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 1(2): 67--74. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McGrath, J.E. Groups: interaction and performance. Prentice-Hall, 1984.Google Scholar
- Newman, M.W., Ducheneaut, N., Edwards, W.k., Sedivy, J.Z., Smith, T.F. Supporting the unremarkable:experiences with the obje Display Mirror. Personal Ubiquitious Computing (2006), Springer-Verlag, 523--536 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Owens, D.A. Structure and status in design teams: implications for design management. Design Management Journal, 1(1): 55--94.Google Scholar
- Poole, M.S., Siebold, D.R., and McPhee, R.D. Group decision-making as a structurational process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71 (1985), 74--102.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Salomon, G. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. New York: Cabridge University Press (1993).Google Scholar
- Saraiya, P., North, C., and Duca, K. An insight-based methodology for evaluating bioinformatics visualization. IEEE Visualization and Computer Graphics, 11(4), 2005, 443--456. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Streitz, N.A., Giessler, J., Holmer, T., Konomi, S., Culler-Tomfelde, C., Reischl, W., Rexroth, P., Seitz, P., and Steinmetz, R. I-Land: an interactive landscape for creativity and innovation. In Proc. CHI '99, ACM Press (1999), 120--127. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Streitz, N., Prante, T., Muller-Tomfelde, C., Tandler, P., and Magerkurth, C. Roomware: the second generation. In Proc CHI Extended Abstracts. ACM Press (2002), 506--507. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Streitz, N.A., Rexroth, P., Holmer, T. Does Roomware matter? Investigating the role of personal and public information devices and their combination in meeting room collaboration. In Proc. ECSCW, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1997), 297--212. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Su, R.E., and Bailey, B.P. Put them where? Towards guidelines for positioning large displays in interactive workspaces. In Proc. of Interact '05, Springer-Verlag (2005), 337--349. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas, J.J., and Cook, K.A. Illuminating the path: the research and development agenda for visual analytics. National Visualization and Analytics Center, 2005.Google Scholar
- Wigdor, D., Shen, C., Forlines, C., Balakrishnan, R. Effects of display position and control space orientation on user preference and performance. In Proc. CHI '06, ACM Press (2006), 309--318. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Presence & placement: exploring the benefits of multiple shared displays on an intellective sensemaking task
Recommendations
The conference room as a toolbox: technological and social routines in corporate meeting spaces
C&T '09: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologiesHCI, CSCW, and ubicomp researchers have developed new technologies and interaction techniques to support collaboration, ranging from electronic whiteboards to software supporting display sharing. However, very few longitudinal studies have explored the ...
Ubiquitous cursor: a comparison of direct and indirect pointing feedback in multi-display environments
GI '11: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2011Multi-display environments (MDEs) connect several displays into a single digital workspace. One of the main problems to be solved in an MDE's design is how to enable movement of objects from one display to another. When the real-world space between ...
MK-pad: a Mouse+Keyboard input technique for distance interaction through a mobile tablet device
APCHI '13: Proceedings of the 11th Asia Pacific Conference on Computer Human InteractionWe introduce MK-Pad (Mouse+Keyboard Pad), a technique for entering text and performing mouse operations using a tablet device for distance interaction. MK-Pad uses the screen of a 10.1" tablet touchscreen to host a soft keyboard and turns the screen ...
Comments