skip to main content
10.1145/1555228.1555232acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ranking the importance of alerts for problem determination in large computer systems

Published:15 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The complexity of large computer systems has raised unprecedented challenges for system management. In practice, operators often collect large volume of monitoring data from system components and set up many rules to check data and trigger alerts. However, the alerts from various rules usually have different problem reporting accuracy because their thresholds are often manually set based on operators' experience and intuition. Meantime, due to system dependencies, a single problem may trigger many alerts at the same time in large systems and the critical question is which alert should be analyzed first in the following problem determination process. In this paper, we propose a novel peer review mechanism to rank the importance of alerts and the top ranked alerts are more likely to be true positives. After comparing a metric value against its threshold to generate alerts, we also compare the value with the equivalent thresholds from many other rules to determine the importance of alerts. Our approach is evaluated with a real test bed system and experimental results are also included to demonstrate its effectiveness.

References

  1. M. Aguilera, J. Mogul, J. Wiener, P. Reynolds, and A. Muthitacharoen. Performance debugging for distributed systems of black boxes. In Proceedings of ACM SOSP, pages 74--89, NY, 2003 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. blog.wired.com/business/2008/02/customers-shrug.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. money.cnn.com/2007/04/18/technology/rimm/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Chen, A. Accardi, E. Kiciman, J. Lloyd, D. Patterson, A. Fox, and E. Brewer. Path-based failure and evolution management. In Proceedings of USENIX NSDI, pages 309--322, San Francisco, CA, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. I. Cohen, S. Zhang, M. Goldszmidt, J. Symons, T. Kelly, and A. Fox. Capturing, indexing, clustering, and retrieving system history. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev., 39(5):105--118, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Gruschke. Integrated event management: event correlation using dependency graphs. In Proceedings of the 9th IFIP/IEEE DSOM, Newark, NJ, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Z. Guo, G. Jiang, H. Chen, and K. Yoshihira. Tracking probabilistic correlation of monitoring data for fault detection in complex systems. In Proceedings of 2006 DSN, pages 259--268, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. www.jboss.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. G. Jiang, H. Chen, and K. Yoshihira. Discovering likely invariants of distributed transaction systems for autonomic system management. In Proceedings of the 3rd ICAC, pages 199--208, Dublin, Ireland, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. Jiang, H. Chen, and K. Yoshihira. Modeling and tracking of transaction ow dynamics for fault detection in complex systems. IEEE Trans. Dependable Sec. Comput., 3(4):312--326, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. G. Jiang, H. Chen, and K. Yoshihira. Efficient and scalable algorithms for inferring likely invariants in distributed systems. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 19(11):1508--1523, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. L. Ljung. System Identification - Theory for The User. Prentice Hall PTR, second edition, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. C. Mas and J.-Y. L. Boudec. An alarm filtering algorithm for optical communication networks. In Chapter 18, Management of Multimedia Networks and Services. Springer, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. www.novell.com/coolsolutions/appnote/16897.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. Oppenheimer, A. Ganapathi, and D. Patterson. Why do internet services fail, and what can be done about it. In Proceedings of of the 4th USITS, pages 1--16, Seattle, WA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Parekh, G. Jung, G. Swint, C. Pu, and A. Sahai. Comparison of performance analysis approaches for bottleneck detection in multi-tier enterprise applications. In Proceedings of IEEE IWQoS, pages 302--306, CT, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. Patterson. A simple way to estimate the cost of downtime. In Proceedings of LISA-2002, pages 185--188, Philadelphia, PA, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. java.sun.com/developer/releases/petstore/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. www.vmware.com/support/vc11/doc/c15alarms.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. A. Yemini and S. Kliger. High speed and robust event correlation. IEEE Communication Magazine, 34(5):82--90, May 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Ranking the importance of alerts for problem determination in large computer systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ICAC '09: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Autonomic computing
        June 2009
        198 pages
        ISBN:9781605585642
        DOI:10.1145/1555228

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 June 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader