skip to main content
10.1145/1566445.1566512acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-seConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Deriving ontological structure from a folksonomy

Published:19 March 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe our investigation of tagging systems and the derivation of ontological structure in the form of a folksonomy from the set of tags. Tagging systems are becoming popular, because the amount of information available on some websites is becoming too large for humans to browse manually and the types of information (multimedia data) is unsuitable for the indexers used by conventional search engines to organize. However, tag-based search is very inaccurate and incomplete (low precision and recall), because the semantics of the tags is both weak and ambiguous. The basic problem is that tags are treated like keywords by search engines, which consider individual tags in isolation. However, there is additional semantics implicit in a collection of tagged data. In this paper, we innovate and investigate techniques to make the implicit semantics explicit, so that search can be improved in both precision and recall and additional utility can be derived from the tags that people associate with multimedia items (pictures, blogs, videos, etc.). Our approach is to propose hypotheses about the ontological structure inherent in a collection of tags and then attempt to verify the hypotheses statistically. We conducted more than one hundred experimental searches on Flickr with different tags and discovered by statistical analysis information about how tags are assigned by users and what ontological knowledge is implicit in these tags that can be made explicit, and ultimately, exploited.

References

  1. ]]Sofia Angeletou, "Semantic Enrichment of Folksonomy Tagspaces," Proc. International Semantic Web Conference, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ]]Sarah Hayman, "Folksonomies and Tagging: New Developments in Social Bookmarking," in Proc. Ark Group Conference, Developing and Improving Classification Schemes, Sydney, Australia, June 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. ]]Munindar P. Singh and Michael N. Huhns, Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, West Sussex, England, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ]]Thomas Vander Wal, "Folksonomy coinage and definition," 2007. http://www.vanderwal.net/folksonomy.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Deriving ontological structure from a folksonomy

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Other conferences
                ACM-SE 47: Proceedings of the 47th Annual Southeast Regional Conference
                March 2009
                430 pages
                ISBN:9781605584218
                DOI:10.1145/1566445

                Copyright © 2009 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 19 March 2009

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate134of240submissions,56%
              • Article Metrics

                • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
                • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

                Other Metrics

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader