skip to main content
10.1145/1570256.1570392acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
technical-note

Learnable evolution model performance impaired by binary tournament survival selection

Published:08 July 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

A Cultural Algorithm (CA) is an evolutionary algorithm augmented by a machine learner. The machine learner updates a knowledgebase with each generation based on bes and least fit individuals. Using a stochastic selection operator may eliminate critical "best" and "worst" individuals via genetic drift thus radically changing the inferred rules. The new rules may be so different from the previous generation as to switch the convergence trajectory to a different optimum. Overall performance may be severely impaired by this optima "thrashing" from generation to generation. This research demonstrates this phenomena using a variant of a CA, Learnable Evolution Model, on a simple problem. The performance between truncation survival selection and binary tournament survival selection operators is compared. It was expected that the latter survival selection operator would introduce pathological effects due to genetic drift because of its stochastic nature. Comparatively binary tournament selection converged more slowly, had larger convergence variations, and converged to inferior solutions than truncation selection. Practitioners that use evolutionary algorithm/machine learner hybrids need to be aware of this problem. Selection operators will have to be judiciously chosen accordingly to avoid deleterious effects of genetic drift on the machine learning component.

References

  1. Thomas Bäck, Ulrich Hammel, and Hans-Paul Schwefel. Evolutionary computation: Comments on the history and current state. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1(1):3--17, Apr. 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. David B. Fogel. An Introduction to Simulated Evolutionary Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5(1):3-14, Jan. 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Robert G. Reynolds. New ideas in optimization, chapter Cultural algorithms: theory and applications, pages 367--378. McGraw-Hill Ltd., UK, Maidenhead, UK, England, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R.S. Michalski. Machine Learning, volume 38, chapter LEARNABLE EVOLUTION MODEL: Evolutionary Processes Guided by Machine Learning, pages 9--40. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J.R. Quinlan. C4.5, Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Coletti, T. Lash, C. Mandsager, and R.S. Michalski. Comparing Performance of the Learnable Evolution Model and Genetic Algorithms on Problems in Digital Signal Filter Design. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO), Orlando, Florida, July 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kenneth De Jong. Evolutionary Computation: a unified approach. The MIT Press, 55 Hayward St., Cambridge, MA 02142, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Learnable evolution model performance impaired by binary tournament survival selection

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '09: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference: Late Breaking Papers
      July 2009
      1760 pages
      ISBN:9781605585055
      DOI:10.1145/1570256

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 July 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • technical-note

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      GECCO '24
      Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 14 - 18, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader