Nicholas Roberts
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Although abundant advice is available for how to develop and validate multi-item scales based on reflective constructs, scant attention has been directed to how to construct and validate formative constructs. Such advice is important because (1) theory suggests many constructs are formative and (2) recent advances in software render testing models with formative constructs more tractable. In this tutorial, our goal is to enhance understanding of formative constructs at the conceptual, statistical and methodological levels. Specifically, we (1) provide general principles for specifying whether a construct should be conceptually modeled as reflective or formative, (2) discuss the statistical logic behind formative constructs, and (3) illustrate how to model and evaluate formative constructs. In particular, we provide a tutorial in which we test and validate professional reward structure, a formative construct, in two popular structural equation modeling programs: EQS and PLS. We conclude with a summary of guidelines for how to conduct and evaluate research using formative constructs.
- Bacharach, S.B. 1989. "Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation," Academy of Management Review (14:4), October, pp. 496--515.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Bagozzi, R.P. 1994. "Structural Equation Models in Marketing Research: Basic Principles," in: Principles of Marketing Research, R.P. Bagozzi (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 317--385.Google Scholar
- Bagozzi, R.P., and Fornell, C. 1982. "Theoretical Concepts, Measurement, and Meaning," in: A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis, C. Fornell (ed.). New York City, New York, U.S.A.: Praeger, pp. 24--38.Google Scholar
- Bagozzi, R.P., and Phillips, L.W. 1982. "Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal," Administrative Science Quarterly (27:3), September, pp. 459--489.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y., and Phillips, L.W. 1991. "Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research," Administrative Science Quarterly (36:3), pp. 421--458.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barclay, D., Higgins, C., and Thomson, R. 1995. "The Partial Least Squares Approach (Pls) to Causal Modeling, Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration," Technology Studies (2:2), pp. 285--309.Google Scholar
- Bartol, K.M. 1979. "Individual Versus Organizational Predictors of Job Satisfaction and Turnover among Professionals," Journal of Vocational Behavior (15:1), pp. 55--67.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bartol, K.M. 1983. "Turnover among Dp Personnel: A Causal Analysis," Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery (26:10), pp. 807--811. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bentler, P.M. 2005. Eqs 6 Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.Google Scholar
- Blalock, H.M. 1971. "Causal Models Involving Unobserved Variables in Stimulus-Response Situations," in: Causal Models in the Social Sciences, H.M. Blalock (ed.). Chicago: Aldine, pp. 335--347.Google Scholar
- Bollen, K. 1984. "Multiple Indicators: Internal Consistency of No Necessary Relationship?" Quality and Quantity (18), pp. 377--385.Google Scholar
- Bollen, K., and Lennox, R. 1991. "Conventional Wisdom on Measurement: A Structural Equation Perspective," Psychological Bulletin (110:2), September, pp. 305--314.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bollen, K.A. 2007. "Interpretational Confounding Is Due to Misspecification, Not to Type of Indicator: Comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007)," Psychological Methods (12:2), pp. 219--228.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bollen, K.L. 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
- Boomsma, A. 2000. "Reporting Analyses of Covariance Structures," Structural Equation Modeling (7), pp. 461--483.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Byrne, B.M. 2006. Structural Equation Modeling with Eqs, (2nd ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Chin, W.W. 1998a. "Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling," MIS Quarterly (22:1), March, pp. vii--xvi. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chin, W.W. 1998b. "The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling," in: Modern Methods for Business Research, G.A. Marcoulides (ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey, U.S.A.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 295--336.Google Scholar
- Churchill, G.A. 1979. "A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs," Journal of Marketing Research (16:1), pp. 64--73.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Teresi, J., Marchi, M., and Velez, C.N. 1990. "Problems in the Measurement Latent Variables in Structural Equations Causal Models," Applied Psychological Measurement (14), pp. 183--196.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Costner, H.L. 1969. "Theory, Deduction, and the Rules of Correspondence," American Journal of Sociology (75), pp. 245--263.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cronbach, L.J., and Meehl, P.E. 1955. "Construct Validity in Psychology Tests," Psychological Bulletin (52:4), pp. 281--302.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R. 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science (35:8), August, pp. 982--1003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- DeVellis, R.F. 1991. Scale Development: Theories and Applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Diamantopoulos, A. 2006. "The Error Term in Formative Measurement Models: Interpretation and Modeling Implications," Journal of Modeling in Management (1:1), pp. 7--17.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Diamantopoulos, A., and Siguaw, J.A. 2006. "Formative Versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration," British Journal of Management (17:4), pp. 263--282.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Diamantopoulos, A., and Winklhofer, H.M. 2001. "Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development," Journal of Marketing Research (38:2), May, pp. 269--277.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edwards, J.R., and Bagozzi, R.P. 2000. "On the Nature and Direction of Relationships between Constructs and Measures," Psychological Methods (5:2), pp. 155--174.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fichman, R.G., and Kemerer, C.F. 1997. "The Assimilation of Software Process Innovations: An Organizational Learning Perspective," Management Science (43:10), October, pp. 1345--1362. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fornell, C., and Bookstein, F.L. 1982. "Two Structural Equation Models: Lisrel and Pls Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory," Journal of Marketing Research (19:4), November, pp. 440--452.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fornell, C., Rhee, B.-D., and Yi, Y. 1991. "Direct Regression, Reverse Regression, and Covariance Structure Analysis," Marketing Letters (2:3), pp. 309--320.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., and Straub, D.W. 2003. "Trust and Tam in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model," MIS Quarterly (27:1), March, pp. 51--91. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gefen, D., and Straub, D. 2005. "A Practical Guide to Factorial Validity Using Pls-Graph: Tutorial and Annotated Example," Communications of the Association for Information Systems (16:5), pp. 91--109.Google Scholar
- Gefen, D., Straub, D.W., and Boudreau, M.-C. 2000. "Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice," Communications of the Association Information Systems (4:7), August, pp. 1--77.Google Scholar
- Hackman, J.R., and Oldham, G.R. 1980. Motivation through the Design of Work. Readings, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tathem, R.L., and Black, W.C. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis, (Fifth ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, U.S.A.: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hauser, R.M., and Goldberger, A.S. 1971. "The Treatment of Unobservable Variables in Path Analysis," in: Sociological Methodology 1971, H.L. Costner (ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 81--117.Google Scholar
- Howell, R.D., Breivik, E., and Wilcox, J.B. 2007. "Reconsidering Formative Measurement," Psychological Methods (12:2), pp. 205--218.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hu, L.T., Bentler, P.M., and Kano, Y. 1992. "Can Test Statistics in Covariance Structure Analysis Be Trusted?," Psychological Bulletin (112:2), pp. 351--362.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Igbaria, M., and Greenhaus, J.H. 1992. "Determinants of Mis Employees' Turnover Intentions: A Structural Equation Model," Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery (35:2), pp. 34--49. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jarvis, C.B., Mackenzie, S.B., and Podsakoff, P.M. 2003. "A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research (30:2), September, pp. 199--218.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joreskog, K.G., and Goldberger, A.S. 1975. "Estimation of a Model with Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes of a Single Latent Variable," Journal of the American Statistical Association (10), pp. 631--639.Google Scholar
- Kline, R.B. 2005. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Little, T.D., Lindenberger, U., and Nesselroade, J.R. 1999. "On Selecting Indicators for Multivariate Measurement and Modeling with Latent Variables: When "Good" Indicators Are Bad And "Bad" Indicators Are Good," Psychological Methods (4:2), pp. 192--211.Google Scholar
- Long, J.S. 1983. Confirmatory Factor Analysis. London; Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Lord, F.M., and Novick, M.R. 1968. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- MacCallum, R.C., and Browne, M.W. 1993. "The Use of Causal Indicators in Covariance Structure Models: Some Practical Issues," Psychological Bulletin (114:3), pp. 533--541.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mardia, K.V. 1970. "Measures of Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis with Applications," Biometrika (57:3), pp. 519--530.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W., and Steers, R.M. 1982. Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment and Absenteeism and Turnover. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Namboodiri, N.K., Carter, L.F., and Blalock, H.M. 1975. Applied Multivariate Analysis and Experimental Designs. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Nelson, R.R., Todd, P.A., and Wixom, B.H. 2005. "Antecedents of Information and System Quality: An Empirical Examination within the Context of Data Warehousing," Journal of Management Information Systems (21:4), pp. 199--235. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nunnally, J.C., and Bernstein, I.H. 1994. Psychometric Theory, (3rd ed.). New York, New York, U.S.A.: McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
- Petter, S., Straub, D., and Rai, A. 2007. "Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research," MIS Quarterly (31:4), December, pp. 623--656. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Purvis, R.L., Sambamurthy, V., and Zmud, R.W. 2001. "The Assimilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation," Organization Science (12:2), pp. 117--135. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., and Seth, N. 2006. "Firm Performance Impacts of Digitally Enabled Supply Chain Integration Capabilities," MIS Quarterly (30:2), June, pp. 225--246. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Satorra, A.C., and Bentler, P.M. 1988. "Scaling Corrections for Chi-Square Statistics in Covariance Structure Analysis," Proceedings of the Business and Economics Sections, Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
- Sievert, M.E., Albritton, R.L., and Roper, P. 1988. "Investigating Computer Anxiety in an Academic Library," Information Technology and Libraries (7:9), pp. 243--252. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Straub, D., Boudreau, M.-C., and Gefen, D. 2004. "Validation Guidelines for Is Positivist Research," Communications of the Association for Information Systems (13:24), April, pp. 380--427.Google Scholar
- Swanson, E.B., and Dans, E. 2000. "System Life Expectancy and the Maintenance Effort: Exploring Their Equilibration," MIS Quarterly (24:2), June, pp. 277--297. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thatcher, J.B., and Perrewe, P.L. 2002. "An Empirical Examination of Individual Traits as Antecedents to Computer Anxiety and Computer Self-Efficacy," MIS Quarterly (26:4), December, pp. 381--396. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thatcher, J.B., Stepina, L.P., and Boyle, R.J. 2003. "Turnover of Information Technology Workers: Examining Empirically the Influence of Attitudes, Job Characteristics, and External Markets," Journal of Management Information Systems (19:3), pp. 231--261. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., and Davis, F.D. 2003. "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View," MIS Quarterly (27:3), pp. 425--478. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Weick, K.E. 1989. "Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination," Academy of Management Review (14:4), October, pp. 516--531.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wixom, B.H., and Watson, H.J. 2001. "An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success," MIS Quarterly (25:1), pp. 17--41. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Conceptualizing and testing formative constructs: tutorial and annotated example
Recommendations
Specifying formative constructs in information systems research
While researchers go to great lengths to justify and prove theoretical links between constructs, the relationship between measurement items and constructs is often ignored. By default, the relationship between construct and item is assumed to be ...
Conceptualising IS-service quality as a multi-dimensional formative construct: an empirical analysis
This study is motivated by, and proceeds from, a central interest in the importance of evaluating IS service quality and adopts the IS ZOT SERVQUAL instrument Kettinger and Lee, 2005 as its core theory base. This study conceptualises IS service quality ...
Formative assessment in b-learning: effectively monitoring students learning
TEEM '14: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing MulticulturalityOne of the objectives of Higher Education is the development of learner autonomy so that students can become effective and efficient learners, with the capability for lifelong learning and for actively engage in the development of a knowledge society. ...
Comments