skip to main content
10.1145/1593254.1593300acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Can affective factors contribute to explain continuance intention of web-based services?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 August 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

More than a decade has been passed since the birth of web-based services as novel network-based services. To explain why and how consumers are motivated to accept the web-based services, lots of technology acceptance theories such as technology acceptance model (TAM) and expectation-confirmation model (ECM) have been successfully proposed. However, the models do not fully explain why and how the consumers continue to use a specific web-based service. Meanwhile, affective factors such as intimacy have been regarded as essential factors for strengthening human relationships in consumer behavior. If a sort of relationships between consumers and web-based services has been built up due to repetitive usage, then we could assume that affective, as well as cognitive, factors may contribute to explain the consumers' continuous use. In light of this assumption, legacy ECM and human relationship-related theoretical models which include affective factors may be integrated for better explanation. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to propose an extended ECM which contains affective factors, as well as cognitive factors, related to maintaining relationship between consumers and service providers to explain why the consumers continue to use a specific information system. In this study, we mainly focus on two new constructs, familiarity and intimacy, and seek to examine how cognitive and affective factors are inter-related toward continuance intention. Moderating effects of emotion to alternatives, familiarity with alternative and intimacy with alternative, to IS continuance intention are also considered.

References

  1. Anderson, E. W. and Fornell, C. 1994. Cross-category variation in customer satisfaction and retention. Marketing Letters. 5, 1, 19--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Anderson, E. W., Fornell, W. C. and Lehmann, D. R. 1994. Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing. 58, 3, 53--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Atchariyachanvanich, K., Okada, H. and Sonehara, N. 2006. What Keeps Online Customers Repurchasing through the Internet?. ACM SIGecom Exchanges. 6, 2, 47--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bhattacherjee, A. 2001a. An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decision Support Systems. 32, 2, 201--214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bhattacherjee, A. 2001b. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly. 25, 3, 351--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bickmore, T. and Picard, R. W. 2005. Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction. 12, 2, 293--327. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Blyth, D. A. and Foster-Clark, E. S. 1987. Gender differences in perceived intimacy with different members of adolescents' social networks. Sex Roles. 17, 689--718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bolton, R. N. and Lemon, K. N. 1999. A dynamic model of customers' usage of services: usage as an antecedent and consequence of satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research. 36, 5, 171--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bornstein, R. F. 1989. Exposure and Affect: Overview and Meta-Analysis of Research, 1968--1987. Psychological Bulletin. 106, 2, 265--289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Chiu, C. M. and Wang, E. T. G. 2008. Understanding web-based learning continuance intention: the role of subjective task value. Information & Management. 45, 3, 194--201. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Colombo, R. A. and Morrison, D. G. 1989. A Brand Switching Model with Implications for Marketing Strategies. Marketing Science. 8, 89--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Cooper, R. B. and Zmud, R. W., 1990. Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Management Science. 36, 2, 123--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Danaher, P. J. and Rust, R. T. 1996. Indirect financial benefits from service quality. Quality Management Journal. 3, 2, 63--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 13, 3, 319--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Frazier, G. L. 1983. Inter-organizational exchange behavior in marketing channels: a broadened perspective. Journal of Marketing. 47, 4, 68--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Gefe, D. 2000. e-Commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega: Internat. J. Management Sci. 28, 6, 725--737.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. and Straub, D. 2003. Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly. 27, 1, 51--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Geyskens, JBEM Steenkamp, N. Kumar 1999. "A Meta-Analysis of Satisfaction in Marketing Channel Relationships. Journal of Marketing Research. 36, 2, 223--238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Granovetter, M. 1982. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In P. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.). Social structure and network analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. 105--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Grayson, K. and Ambler, T. 1999. The Dark Side of Long-Term Relationships in Marketing Services. Journal of Marketing Research. 36, 1, 132--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Gwinner, K. P. 1998. Relational benefits in services industries: the customer's perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 26, 2, 101--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. He, J. W. and Wei, K. K. 2006. Knowledge Management Systems (KMS) Continuance in Organizations: A Social Relational Perspective. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 4092, 34--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jap, S. D. and Ganesan, S. 2000. Control Mechanisms and the Relationship Life Cycle: Implications for Safeguarding Specific Investments and Developing Commitment. Journal of Marketing Research. 27, 2, 227--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Karahanna, E. and Straub, D. W. and Chervany, N. L. 1999. Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly. 23, 2, 183--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Kim, G., Shin, B. and Lee, H. G. 2006. A Study of Factors that Affect User Intentions Toward Email Service Switching. Information and Management. 43, 6, 884--893. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Komiak, X. S. and Benbasat, I. 2006. The effects of personalization and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents. MIS Quarterly. 30, 4, 941--960. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Kwon, T. H. and Zmud, R. W. 1987. Unifying the Fragmented Models of Information Systems Implementation. in Critical Issues in Information Systems Research. Boland, R. J. and Hirschheim, R. A. (eds.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, 227--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Lam, S. Y., Shankar, V., Erramilli, M. K. and Murthy, B. 2004. Customer value, satisfaction, loyalty, and switching costs: an illustration from a business-to-business service context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 32, 3, 293--311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F. and Pietromonaco, P. R. 1998. Intimacy as an interpersonal process: the importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 74, 12, 38--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Liao, C., Chen, J. L. and Yen, D. C. 2007. Theory of planning behavior (TPB) and customer satisfaction in the continued use of e-service: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior. 23, 2804--2822. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Limayem, M. and Cheung, C. M. K. 2008. Understanding information systems continuance: The case of Internet-based learning technologies. Information & Management. 45, 4, 227--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Lin, C. S., Wu, S. and Tsai, R. J. 2005. Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation-confirmation model for web portal context. Information & Management. 42, 683--693. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Lowenthal, M. F. and Haven, C. 1968. Interaction and adaptation: Intimacy as a critical variable. American Sociological Review. 33, 20--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Marsden, P. V. and Campbell, K. E. 1984. Measuring tie strength. Social Forces. 63, 2, 482--501.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Maslow, A. H. 1937. The Influence on Familiarization on Preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 21, 162--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Mathieson, K. 1991. Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research. 2, 3, 173--191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Matlin, M. W. 1971. Response, Competition, Recognition, and Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 19, 3, 295--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Miller, R. S. and Lefcourt, H. M. 1982. The assessment of social intimacy. Journal of Personality Assessment. 46, 414--518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Min, Q. and Shenghua, X. 2007. An Extended Expectation Confirmation Model for Information Systems Continuance. Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2007. WiCom 2007. International Conference on. 3879--3882.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Moss, B. F. and Schwebel, A. I. 1993. Defining Intimacy in Romantic Relationships. Family Relations. 42, 1, 31--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Oliver, R. L. 1980. A cognitive model for the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research. 17, 4, 460--469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Oliver, R. L. 1993. A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Service Satisfaction: Compatible Goals, Different Concepts. in Advances in Services Marketing and Management: Research and Practice. 2, T. A. Swartz, D. E. Bowen, and S. W. Brown, eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Oliver, R. L. 1996. Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Oliver, R. L. and DeSarbo, W. S. 1988. Response Determinants in Satisfaction Judgments. Journal of Consumer Research. 14, 495--507.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Raj, S. P. 1985. Striking a Balance between Brand 'Popularity' and Brand Loyalty. Journal of Marketing. 49, 53--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Reis, H. T. and Shaver, P. 1988. Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck (Ed.). Handbook of research in personal relationships. London, Wiley, 367--389.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Rindfleisch, A. and Inman, J. 1998. Explaining the familiarity-liking relationship: mere exposure, information availability, or social desirability?. Marketing Letters. Holanda: Kluwer Academic Press. 9, 1, 5--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Roca, J. C., Chiub, C. M. and Martíneza, F. J. 2006. Understanding e-learning continuance intention: an extension of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 64, 683--696. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations. 4th Edition. Free Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Rusbult, C. E. and Farrell, D. 1983. A longitudinal test of the investment model: the impact on job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover of variations in rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. Journal of Applied Psychology. 68, 3, 429--438.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Schaefer, M. T. and Olson, D. H. 1981. Assessing intimacy: The PAIR inventory. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 7, 47--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Seddon, P. B. 1997. A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. Information Systems Research. 8, 3, 240--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Stern, B. B. 1997. Advertising intimacy: relationship marketing and the services consumer. Journal of Advertising. 4, 7--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Sullivan, H. S. 1953. The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry, W. W. Norton, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Szymanski, D. M. and Henard, D. H. 2001. Customer satisfaction: a meta analysis of empirical evidence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 29, 1, 16--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A. 1995. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research. 6, 2, 144--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, S. J. and Tam, K. Y. 2006. The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. International Journal of Human-Computer Systems. 64, 799--810. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Timmerman G. M. 1991. A Concept Analysis of Intimacy. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 12, 19--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Tomasi, A. 2007. Technology and Intimacy in the Philosophy of Georges Bataille. Human Studies. 30, 4, 411--428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Tsai, H. T. and Huang, H. C. 2007. Determinants of e-repurchase intentions: An integrative model of quadruple retention drivers. Information & Management. 44, 3, 231--239. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Van Slyke, C., Shim, J. T. and Johnson, R. 2006. Concern for Information Privacy and Online Consumer Purchasing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 7, 6, 415--444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Vatanasombut, B., Igbaria, M., Stylianou, A. C. and Rodgers, W. 2008. Information systems continuance intention of web-based applications customers: The case of online banking. Information & Management. 45, 7, 419--428. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. 2000. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science. 46, 2, 186--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. and Davis, F. D. 2003. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly. 27, 3, 425--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Venkatesh, V. 2000. Determinants of Perceived ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research. 11, 4, 342--365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Verhoef, P. C., Francis, P. H. and Hoekstra, J. C. 2002. The effect of relational constructs on customer referrals and number of services purchased from multiservice provider: Does age of relationship matter?. Academy of Marketing Science. 30, 3, 202--212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Wellman, B. 2001. Physical place and cyber place: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 25, 227--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Zajonc, R. B. 1980. Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need no Inferences. American Psychologist. 35, 151--175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Zajonc, R. B. and Helen, M. 1982. Affective and Cognitive Factors in Preference. Journal of Consumer Research. 9, 123--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Can affective factors contribute to explain continuance intention of web-based services?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEC '09: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Electronic Commerce
      August 2009
      407 pages
      ISBN:9781605585864
      DOI:10.1145/1593254

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 August 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate150of244submissions,61%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader