skip to main content
10.1145/1599410.1599416acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesppdpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A dynamically customizable process-centered evaluation model

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 September 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the graph operational semantics approach used for defining NiMo nets execution, which mix lazy, data-driven and a weak form of eager evaluation, all in parallel. NiMo is a totally graphic language from the family of higher order typed languages but with a strong data-flow inspiration. Programs are process networks that evolve showing the full state at each execution step and can be dynamically changed or completed. In NiMo parallelization is implicit. The conjunction of two kinds of tags determine which processes are able to act in the same execution step. According to their tag, processes can behave in five modes that can be globally or locally set for each one, and can be also dynamically changed. Combining modes gives a very flexible way to experiment different strategies to increase processor usage, decrease channel population, and achieve subnet synchronization. Together with symbolic execution it also provides the means for generative and multi-stage programming.

References

  1. AGG Home page. Agg home page, 2009. URL http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~gragra/agg/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Clem Baker-Finch, David J. King, and Phil Trinder. An operational semantics for parallel lazy evaluation. In ICFP '00: Proceedings of the fifth ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Functional programming, pages 162--173, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM. ISBN 1-58113-202-6. doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145351240.351256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chihhong Patrick Cheng, Teale Fristoe, and Edward A. Lee. Applied verification: The ptolemy approach. Technical Report UCB/EECS-2008-41, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley, Apr 2008. URL http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2008/EECS-2008-41.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Clerici, A. Duch, and C. Zoltan. Implementing static synchronus sensor fields using nimo, 2009. URL http://www.lsi.upc.edu/dept/techreps/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Silvia Clerici and Cristina Zoltan. Graphical type inference. a graph grammar definition. Technical Report LSI-07-24-R, Dept. Llenguatges i Sistemes Informàtics, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, July 2007. URL http://www.lsi.upc.edu/dept/techreps/llistat_detallat.php?id=970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Silvia Clerici and Cristina Zoltan. A graphic functional-dataflow language. In Hans-Wolfgang Loidl, editor, Trends in Functional Programming, volume 5 of Trends in Functional Programming, pages 129--144. Intellect, 2004. ISBN 1-84150-144-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Silvia Clerici, Cristina Zoltan, Guillermo Prestigiacomo, and Javier García Sanjulián. Diseño de un entorno integrado de desarrollo para nimo. In VI Jornadas de programación y lenguajes-Prole 2006, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Laurent Dami and Didier Vallet. Higher-order functional composition in visual form, 1996. URL http://cuiwww.unige.ch/OSG/publications/OO-articles/TechnicalReports/96/ho-visual.ps.Z.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. John Davis II, Christopher Hylands, Bart Kienhuis, Edward A. Lee, Jie Liu, Xiaojun Liu, Lukito Muliadi, Steve Neuendorffer, Jeff Tsay, Brian Vogel, and Yuhong Xiong. Heterogeneous concurrent modeling and design in java. Technical Report Technical Memorandum UCB/ERL M01/12, Electronics Research Laboratory, Dept of EECS, University of California at Berkeley, March 2001. URL http://ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Juan de Lara, Claudia Ermel, Gabriele Taentzer, and Karsten Ehrig. Parallel graph transformation for model simulation applied to timed transition petri nets. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci., 109:17--29, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Stephan Ellner and Walid Taha. The semantics of graphical languages. In PEPM'07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Partial evaluation and semantics-based program manipulation, pages 122--133, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. ISBN 978-1-59593-620-2. doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1244381.1244402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Maude Home Page. Maude, 2009. URL http://maude.cs.uiuc.edu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Masaki Nakamura and Kazuhiro Ogata. The evaluation strategy for head normal form with and without on-demand flags, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Grzegorz Rozenberg, editor. Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformations, Volume 1: Foundations, 1997. World Scientific. ISBN 9810228848. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Walid Taha. A gentle introduction to multi-stage programming. In Domain-Specific Program Generation, pages 30--50, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A dynamically customizable process-centered evaluation model

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          PPDP '09: Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Principles and practice of declarative programming
          September 2009
          324 pages
          ISBN:9781605585680
          DOI:10.1145/1599410

          Copyright © 2009 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 September 2009

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate230of486submissions,47%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader