skip to main content
10.1145/1632149.1632163acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Glaserian and Straussian grounded theory: similar or completely different?

Published:12 October 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Grounded Theory is growing in popularity as a research method in ICT research areas such as Information Systems and Software Engineering. Although there are two distinct methods, namely the Glaserian and the Straussian versions, a substantial number of research articles tend to ignore the difference and just claim that they are using grounded theory. To a researcher new to the grounded theory method, the two methods look very similar. Because the Straussian method is more prescriptive, most opt to follow this method, without investigating the Glaserian version. The few who try to use a hybrid of the two methods (not appreciating that the two methods are substantially different), only realize after a significant investment in time that the methods are not reconcilable and that either the one or the other should be followed. To contribute towards eliminating the confusion, this paper investigates the differences between the two methods. This will, hopefully, enable ICT researchers to make a more informed decision on which method to follow.

References

  1. Adolph, S., Hall, W., and Kruchten, P. 2008. A methodological leg to stand on: lessons learned using grounded theory to study software development. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference of the Center For Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research: Meeting of Minds (Ontario, Canada, October 27--30, 2008). M. Chechik, M. Vidger and D. Stewart, Eds. CASCON '08. ACM, DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1463788.1463806 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. de Villiers, M. R. 2005. Three approaches as pillars for interpretive information systems research: development research, action research and grounded theory. In Proceedings of the 2005 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries (White River, South Africa, September 20--22, 2005). SAICSIT, vol 150, 142--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Douglas, D. 2003. Grounded theories of management: a methodological review. Management Research News, 26(5).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Etkins, R. 1997. Male Femaling: A Grounded Theory Approach to Cross-dressing and Sex-changing. Routlegde, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Geiger, S. and Turley, D. 2003. Grounded theory in sales research: an investigation of salespeople's client relationships. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 18(6/7), 580--594.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. 1965. Awareness of Dying. Aldine, Chicago, Illinois.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago, Illinois.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. 1968. Time for Dying. Aldine, Chicago, Illinois.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. 1971. Status Passage. Aldine, Chicago, Illinois.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Glaser, B. G. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity. Sociology Press, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Glaser, B. G. 1992. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Sociology Press, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Glaser, B. G. (Ed.). 1994. Grounded Theory 1984--1994. Vol 1. Sociology Press, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Glaser, B. G. (Ed.) 1996. Gerund Grounded Theory: The Basic Social Process Dissertation. Sociology Press, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Glaser, B. G. 1998. Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Sociology Press, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Glaser, B. G. 2001. The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description. Sociology Press, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Glaser, B. G. 2003. The Grounded Theory Perspective II: Description's Remodeling of Grounded Theory Methodologies. Sociology Press, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Glaser, B. G. 2005. The Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical Coding. Sociological Press, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Glaser, B. G. 2008. Doing Quantitative Grounded Theory. Sociology Press, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Goddard, A. 2004. Budgetary practices and accountability habitus: a grounded theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 17(4).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Goede, R. and de Villiers, C. 2003. The applicability of grounded theory as research methodology in studies on the use of methodologies in IS practices. In Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on Enablement through Technology (September 17--19, 2003). J Eloff, A Engelbrecht, P Kotzé, and M Eloff, Eds. SAICSIT, vol 47, 208--217. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Goulding, C. 2002. Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide for Management, Business and Market Researchers. Sage, London.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Holton, J. (Ed.) 2005. The Grounded Theory Review: An International Journal, 4(2). Sociology Press, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Locke, K. 2001. Grounded Theory in Management Research. Sage, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Macrì, D. M., Tagliaventi, M. R., and Bertolotti, F. 2002. A grounded theory for resistance to change in a small organization. Journal of Organisational Change Management, 15(3), 292--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Matavire, R. and Brown, I. 2008. Investigating the use of "Grounded Theory" in information systems research. In Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT Research in Developing Countries: Riding the Wave of Technology (Wildernis, South Africa, October 06--08, 2008). SAICSIT '08, vol 338. ACM, New York, NY, 139--147. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1456659.1456676 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Pandit, N. R. 1996. The creation of theory: a recent application of the grounded theory method. The Qualitative Report, 2(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Pauleen, D. J. 2001. A Grounded Theory of Virtual Organizations: Building Relationships with Virtual Team Members. PhD thesis Victoria University of Wellington.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Pauleen, D. J. and Yoong, P. 2004. Studying human-centered IT innovation using a grounded action learning approach. The Qualitative Report, 9(1), 137--160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sarker, S., Lau, F., and Sahay, S. 2001. Using an adapted grouned theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 32(1), 38--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., and Thronhill, A. 2003. Research Methods for Business students. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Simmons, O. E. 1994. Illegitimate use of the 'grounded theory' title. In Grounded Theory: 1984--1994. Glaser. Ed. Sociology Press, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Stern, P. N. 1994. Eroding grounded theory. In Grounded Theory: 1984--1994. Glaser. Ed. Sociology Press, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Strauss, A. 1987. Qualitative Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage, California. B.G.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Glaserian and Straussian grounded theory: similar or completely different?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        SAICSIT '09: Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists
        October 2009
        225 pages
        ISBN:9781605586434
        DOI:10.1145/1632149

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 October 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate187of439submissions,43%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader