skip to main content
10.1145/1641804.1641861acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Efficient channel assignment algorithms for infrastructure WLANs under dense deployment

Published:26 October 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

It is well known that WLAN based on the IEEE 802.11 standard suffers from interference and scalability problems due to a limited number of non-overlapping channels. In order to mitigate the interference problem, channel assignment algorithms have been a popular research topic in recent years. It has been shown that such algorithms can greatly reduce the interference among wireless access points. However, in this paper we show that previously proposed channel assignment algorithms may lead to an increased number of hidden nodes in dense network deployments. We also show that this can significantly decrease the performance of the network. Furthermore, we present results from experiments showing that the RTS/CTS mechanism is unable to solve the hidden node problem in infrastructure WLANs and therefore, careful consideration needs to be taken when choosing channel assignment strategies in densely deployed wireless networks. To this end, we propose two novel channel assignment algorithms. Using a simulation study, we show that the proposed algorithms can outperform traditional channel assignment in densely deployed scenarios, in terms of QoS sensitive VoIP support without compromising the aggregate throughput and are therefore a better performing alternative in such settings.

References

  1. A. Akella, G. Judd, S. Seshan, and P. Steenkiste, "Self-Management in Chaotic Wireless Deployments," Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 185--199, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Geier, "Interference from cordless phones," Available at: http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/tutorials/article.php/2191241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. N. Golmie, N. Chevrollier, and O. Rebala, "Bluetooth and WLAN Coexistence: Challenges and Solutions," IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 22--29, 2003. 1536--1284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. P. Jin, P. Seung-Keun, K. Dong-Ho, C. Pyung-Dong, and C. Kyoung-Rok, "Experiments on Radio Interference between Wireless LAN and Other radio devices on a 2.4 GHz ISM Band," in The 57th IEEE Semiannual Vehicular Technology Conference. vol. 3, pp. 1798--1801, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Jung-Hyuck and H. Jayant, "Performance Evaluation of Multiple IEEE 802.11b WLAN Stations in the Presence of Bluetooth Radio Interference," Communications, 2003. ICC '03. IEEE International Conference on, vol. 2, pp. 1163--1168, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Y. Matsumoto, M. Takeuchi, K. Fujii, A. Sugiura, and Y. Yamanaka, "Performance Analysis of Interference Problems Involving DS-SS WLAN Systems and Microwave Ovens," IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 45--53, 2005. 0018-9375.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. L. Navarro-Garcia and J. I. Alonso, "A Novel Method for Interference Analysis in IEEE 802.11 WLAN's in Coexistence with Bluetooth," Wireless Technology, 2005. The European Conference on, pp. 181--184, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. K. Premkumar and S. H. Srinivasan, "Diversity Techniques for Interference Mitigation between IEEE 802.11 WLANs and Bluetooth," Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2005. PIMRC 2005. IEEE 16th International Symposium on, vol. 3, pp. 1468--1472, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. "IEEE Standard for Information Technology - Telecommunications and Information Exchange between Systems - Local and Metropolitan Area Networks - Specific Requirement. Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications. Amendment 2: Higher-Speed Physical Layer (PHY) Extension in the 2.4 GHz Band - Corrigendum 1," IEEE Std 802.11b-1999/Cor 1-2001, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. B.-J. K. Kin K. Leung, "Frequency assignment for IEEE 802.11 wireless networks," Vehicular Technology Conference, 2003. VTC 2003-Fall. 2003 IEEE 58th, pp. 142--1426, Vol. 3, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. L. Youngseok, K. Kyoungae, and C. Yanghee, "Optimization of AP Placement and Channel Assignment in Wireless LANs," Local Computer Networks, 2002. Proceedings. LCN 2002. 27th Annual IEEE Conference on, pp. 831--836, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Iridon, D. Matula, and C. Yang, "A Graph Theoretic Approach for Channel Assignment in Cellular Networks," Wireless Networks, vol. 7, no. 6, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Riihijarvi, M. Petrova, P. Mahonen, and J. de Almeida Barbosa, "Performance Evaluation of Automatic Channel Assignment Mechanism for IEEE 802.11 Based on Graph Colouring," Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2006 IEEE 17th International Symposium on, pp. 1--5, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. K. N. Sivarajan, R. J. McEliece, and J. W. Ketchum, "Dynamic channel assignment in cellular radio," In Vehicular Technology Conference, pages 631--637, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. K. Okada and F. Kubota, ";On dynamic channel assignment in cellular mobile radio systems," In IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pages 938--941 vol.2, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Z. Xu and P. B. Mirchandani, "Virtually fixed channel assignment for cellular radio-telephone systems: a model and evaluation," In IEEE International Conference on Discovering a New World of Communications, pages 1037--1041 vol.2, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. K. N. Ramachandran, E. M. Belding, K. C. Almeroth, and M. M. Buddhikot, "Interference-aware channel assignment in multi-radio wireless mesh networks," In IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM),pages 1--12, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. Mishra, S. Banerjee, and W. Arbaugh, "Weighted Coloring Based Channel Assignment in WLANs," ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, Vol. 9, pp. 19--31, 2005. 1559--1662. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Riihijarvi, M. Petrova, and P. Mahonen, "Frequency Allocation for WLANs using Graph Colouring Techniques," in Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services, pp. 216---222, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Manitpornsut and B. Landfeldt, "Weighted Channel Allocation and Power Control for Self-Configurable Infrastructure WLANs," Journal of Interconnection Networks, 9(3): 299--316 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. Ray, D. Starobinski, and J. B. Carruthers, "Performance of Wireless Networks with Hidden Nodes: A Queuing-Theoretic Analysis," Journal of Computer Communications, vol. 28, pp. 1179--1192, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. H. Chin Keong and M. G. L. Jean-Paul, "Analysis of the RTS/CTS Multiple Access Scheme with Capture Effect," in Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2006 IEEE 17th International Symposium on, pp. 1--5, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Papanastasiou, M. Ould-Khaoua, and V. Charissis, "The Effect of the RTS/CTS Handshake on TCP," in Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, 2007, AINAW '07. 21st International Conference on, vol. 2, pp. 940--946, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. H. Jasani and N. Alaraje, "Evaluating the Performance of IEEE 802.11 Network using RTS/CTS Mechanism," in Electro/Information Technology, 2007 IEEE International Conference on, pp. 616--621, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. A. Tsertou and D. I. Laurenson, "Revisiting the Hidden Terminal Problem in a CSMA/CA Wireless Network," Mobile Computing, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 817--831, 2008. 1536--1233. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. J. L. Sobrinho, R. de Haan, and J. M. Brazio, "Why RTS-CTS is not Your Ideal Wireless LAN Multiple Access Protocol," in Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2005 IEEE, vol. 1, pp. 81--87 Vol. 1, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. W. Chien-Min and H. Ting-Chao, "The Impact of RTS/CTS on Performance of Wireless Multihop Ad Hoc Networks using IEEE 802.11 Protocol," in Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2005 IEEE International Conference on, vol. 4, pp. 3558--3562 Vol. 4, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. P. C. Ng, S. C. Liew, K. C. Sha, and W. T. To, "Experimental Study of Hidden-Node Problem in IEEE 802.11 Wireless Networks," in ACM SIGCOMM, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. OPNET Modeler. {Online}. Available: http://www.opnet.com/support/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. ITU-T Recommendation G.107: The E-model, A Computational Model for Use in Transmission Planning, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. A. Rahman and P. Gburzynski, "Hidden Problems with the Hidden Node Problem," in Communications 23rd Biennial Symposium on, 2006, pp. 270--273.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. S. Ray, J. B. Carruthers, and D. Starobinski, "RTS/CTS-induced congestionin ad hoc wireless LANs," in WCMC, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. A. K. Frank Y. Li and P. Engelstad, "Passive and Active Hidden Terminal Detection in 802.11-Based Ad-Hoc Networks," in INFOCOM, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Efficient channel assignment algorithms for infrastructure WLANs under dense deployment

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MSWiM '09: Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems
          October 2009
          438 pages
          ISBN:9781605586168
          DOI:10.1145/1641804

          Copyright © 2009 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 October 2009

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,577submissions,25%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader