skip to main content
10.1145/1655925.1655935acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Relationship of blink, affect, and usability of graph reading tasks

Published:24 November 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Dynamic graphs that represent a great deal of time-series data have become increasingly common these days. Although previous research revealed that blink facilitates visual search tasks by attracting human attention, blink features have not been clearly evident in a dynamic graph reading context. This study examines the effects of blink on the user's affective experience and usability of using a blinking line graph. Additionally, this study describes the empirical experiment setup for investigating the characteristics of task types as a moderator to the relationship between blink and the user's experience. This research aims (1) to theoretically contribute graph comprehension domain by investigating the effects of blink on a graph comprehension process, (2) to design a quantitative experiment and to propose possible hypotheses, and (3) to understand the influence of task types on reading of a blinking graph.

References

  1. A. Morse, "Some principles for the effective display of data," ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 13, 1979, pp. 94--101, doi:ACM O-89791-004-4/79/0800-094. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. L. Smith and N. C. Goodwin, "Blink coding for information display," Human Factor, vol. 13. 1971, pp. 283--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J. H. R. Maunsell and S. Treue, "Feature-based attention in visual cortex," Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 29, June. 2006, pp. 317--322, doi:10.1016/j.tins.2006.04.001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M. Girelli and S. J. Luck, "Are the same attentional mechanisms used to detect visual search targets defined by color, orientation, and motion?," Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 9, 1997, pp. 238--253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Y. Pinto, C. N. L. Olivers, and J. Theeuwes, "When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient?," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 32, 2006, pp. 59--72, doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Hartmann, A. Sutcliffe, and A. D. Angeli. "Investigating attractiveness in Web User Interfaces," Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems: Empirical Studies of Web Interaction (CHI 07), ACM Press, Apr. 2007, pp. 387--396, doi:ACM 978-1-59593-593-9/07/0004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. I. Nakarada-Kordic and B. Lobb. "Effect of perceived attractiveness of web interface design on visual search of web sites," Proc. 6th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand Chapter's Inter. Conf. Computer-Human Interaction: Making CHI Natural (CHINZ 05), ACM Press, July. 2005, pp. 25--27, doi:ACM 1-59593-036-1/04/10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. W. Lee and I. Benbasat, "Designing an electronic commerce interface: Attention and product memory as elicited by web design," Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, vol. 2, Apr. 2003, pp. 240--253, doi:10.1016/S1567--4223(03)00026-7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. N. Gershon and W. Page, "What storytelling can do for Information Visualization," Communications of the ACM, vol. 44, Aug. 2001, pp. 31--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Nielsen and H. Loranger, Prioritizing Web Usability. C. Peri, Ed. Berkeley, CA: New Riders, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. Takahashi and Y. Tsukahara, "Pocket Monster incident and low luminance visual stimuli: Special reference to deep red flicker stimulation," Acfa Faediafrica Japonica, vol. 40, May. 1998, pp. 631--637.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. W. Hong, J. Y. L. Thong, and K. Y. Tam, "How do web users respond to non-banner-Ads animation? The Effects of Task Type and User Experience," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 58, June. 2007, pp. 1467--1482, doi:10.1002/asi.20624. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. W. Hong, J. Y. L. Thong, and K. Y. Tam, "Does animation attract online users' attention?: The effects of flash on information search performance and perceptions," Information Systems Research, vol. 15, Mar. 2004, pp. 60--86, doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. K. Hornbæk, "Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 64, Feb. 2006, pp. 79--102, doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. I. Zigurs and B. K. Buckland, "A theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems effectiveness," MIS Quarterly, vol. 22, Sep. 1998, pp. 313--334. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. J. Campbell, "Task complexity: A review and analysis," The Academy of Management Review, vol. 13, Jan. 1988, pp. 40--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. N. Kumar and I. Benbasat, "The effect of relationship encoding, task type, and complexity on information representation: An empirical evaluation of 2D and 3D line graphs," MIS Quarterly, vol. 28, June. 2004, pp. 255--281. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. P. Callahan, et al. "VisTrails: Visualization meets data management," Proc. ACM SIGMOD Inter. Conf. Management of Data (SIGMOD 06), ACM Press, Jun. 2006, pp. 745--747, doi:ACM 1595932569/06/0006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. V. Mendoza and D. G. Novick. "Usability over time," Proc. 23rd Annual Inter. Conf. Design of Communication: Documenting&Designing for Pervasive Information (SIGDOC 05), ACM Press, Sept. 2005, pp. 151--158, doi:ACM 1-59593-175-9/05/0009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. E. Karapanos, M. Hassenzahl, and J-B. Martens. "User experience over time," Proc. Works in Progress. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 08), ACM Press, Apr. 2008, pp. 3561--3566, doi:ACM 978-1-60558-012-8/08/04. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. N. Friel, F. R. Curcio, and G. W. Bright, "Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications," Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 32, Mar. 2001, pp. 124--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. M. Hegarty, "Dynamic visualizations and learning: getting to the difficult questions," Learning and Instruction, vol. 14, 2004, pp. 343--351.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. J. G. Hollands and I. Spence, "Judging proportion with graphs: The summation model," Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 12, 1998, pp. 173--190, doi:CCC 0888-4080/98/020173-18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. S. B. Trickett and J. G. Trafton, "Spatial transformations in graph comprehension," in Diagrams, A. Blackwell, Ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2004, pp. 372--375.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. S. B. Trickett and J. G. Trafton, "Toward a comprehensive model of graph comprehension: Making the case for spatial cognition," in Diagrams, D. Barker-Plummer, Ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006, pp. 286--300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. D. Simkin and R. Hastie, "An information-processing analysis of graph perception," Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 82, June. 1987, pp. 454--465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. P. Shah and P. A. Carpenter, "Conceptual limitations in comprehending line graphs," Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 124, 1995, pp. 43--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. S. Pinker, "A theory of graph comprehension," in Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Testing, R. Feedle, Ed. 1990. pp. 73--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. G. L. West, A. A. K. Anderson, and J. Pratt, "Motivationally significant stimuli show visual prior entry: Evidence for attentional capture." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 35, 2009, pp. 1032--1042, doi:10.1037/a0014493.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. J. R. Brockmole and W. R. Boot, "Should I stay or should I go? Attentional disengagement from visually unique and unexpected items at fixation," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 35, 2009, pp. 808--815, doi:10.1037/a0013707.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. C. M. Bloomer, Principles of Visual Perception. London: The Herbert Press, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. I. E. Gordon, Theories of Visual Perception, 3rd ed. New York: Psychology Press, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. D. A. Norman, A. Ortony, and D. M. Russell, "Affect and machine design: Lessons for the development of autonomous machines," IBM Systems Journal, vol. 42, 2003, pp. 38--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. H. Sun and P. Zhang, "The role of affect in Information Systems research: A critical survey and a research model," in HCI in MIS (I): Foundations, P. Zhang and D. Galletta, Eds. Sharpe Publisher, 2005; pp. 333--333.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. D. A. Norman, Emotional design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books, 2004, pp. 21--29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. B. Reeves and C. Nass, The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge: CSLI Publications, 1998, pp. 131--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. J. P. Chin, V. A. Diehl, and K. L. Norman. "Development of an instrument for measuring user satisfaction of the Human-Computer Interface," Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 88), ACM Press, 1988. pp. 213--218, doi:ACM-O-89791-265-9/88/0004/021. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. S. M. Kosslyn, Graph Design for the Eye and Mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Relationship of blink, affect, and usability of graph reading tasks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICIS '09: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interaction Sciences: Information Technology, Culture and Human
        November 2009
        1479 pages
        ISBN:9781605587103
        DOI:10.1145/1655925

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 November 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader