skip to main content
10.1145/166237.166238acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

On per-session end-to-end delay distributions and the call admission problem for real-time applications with QOS requirements

Published:01 October 1993Publication History

ABSTRACT

A crucial problem facing the designers and deployers of future high-speed networks is providing applications with quality of service (QOS) guarantees. For soft real-time applications, which are delay sensitive but loss tolerant, delay distribution is an important QOS measure of interest. In this paper we study (through simulation) the end-to-end delay distribution seen by individual sessions under simple first-come first-served (FCFS) multiplexing in a network model with two significant features: (1) all traffic is connection-oriented, (2) cross traffic along routes is representative of that seen by calls in a moderately sized wide area network (i.e., less than 100 switches). We compare these delay distributions with the worst case point-valued analytic delay bounds predicted by three different techniques for providing such bounds (two of which require a more sophisticated link-level scheduling policy). We also consider the per-hop delay distributions seen as a session progresses "deeper" into the network and determine the sensitivity of these delay distributions to the manner in which the interfering traffic is modeled. Finally, we use our delay distribution results to examine the tradeoff between the QOS requested by a call, the manner in which the QOS guarantee is provided, and the number of calls that are admitted at the requested QOS.

References

  1. 1.BRADY, P. T. A statistical analysis of on-off patterns in 16 conversations. Bell System Technical Journal ~t 7, 1 (Jan. 1968), 73-91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.CHANG, C.-S. Stability, queue length, and delay, part I: Deterministic queueing networks. Research Report RC 17708, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, Feb. 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.CHANG, C.-S. Stability, queue length, and delay, part II: Stochastic queueing networks. Research Report RC 17709, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, IVY, Feb. 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.CLARK, D. D., SHm~BR, S., AND ZHANG, L. Supporting real-time applications in an integrated services packet network: architecture and mechanism. In SI- GCOMM Symposium on Communications Architectures and Protocols (Baltimore, MD, Aug. 1992), ACM, pp. 14-26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.CRUZ, R. L. A calculus for network delay, part I: Network elements in isolation. IEEE Teansaetions on Information Theory 37, 1 (Jan. 1991), 114-131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.CRuz, R. L. A calculus for network delay, part Ih Network analysis. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 37, 1 (Jan. 1991), 132-141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Dt~MERS, A., KBSHAV, S., AND SHENKER, S. Analysis and simulation of a fair queueing algorithm. Internetworking: Research and Ezperience 1, 1 (Jan. 1990), 3-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.ELWALW, A. I., AND MITRA, D. Effective bandwidth of general markovian traffic sources and admission control of high-speed networks. IEEE/ACM Trunsactions on Networking i, 3 (June 1993). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.F~.RaAtU, D., AND VErandA, D. C. A scheme for real-tlme channel establishment in wide-area networks. iEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 8, 3 (Apr. 1990), 368-379.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.GOLBSTANI, S. J. Congestion-free communication in high-speed packet networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications 39, 12 (Dec. 1991), 1802-1812.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.GOLESTANI, S. J. A framing strategy for congestion management. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 9, 7 (Sept. 1991), 1064-1077.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.GP.~.NBBttG, A. G., AND MADRAS, N. Comparison of a fair queueing discipline to processor sharing. In Performance '90: 14th International Symposium on Computer Performance Modelling, Measurement and Evaluation (Edinburgh, Scotland, Sept. 1990), P. J. B. King, I. Mitrani, and R. J. Pooley, Eds., IFIP WG7.3, North- Holland, Amsterdam, Holland, pp. 193-20T. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.GmilUN, R., AHMADI, H., AND NAGHSHINEH, M. Equivalent capacity and its application to bandwidth allocation in high-speed networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 9, 7 (Sept. 1991), 968-981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.HEFFES, H., AND LUCANTONI, D. M. A Markov modulated characterization of packetized voice and data traffic and related statistical multiplexer performance. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications SAC-g, 6 (Sept. 1986), 856-868.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.JAMn~, S., S~mNEBR, S., ZHANG, L., AND CLARK, D. D. An admission control algorithm for predictive real-time service (extended abstract). In Proceedingz of the Third International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video (San Diego, CA, Nov. 1992), IEEE, pp. 308-314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.KAMITAKE, T., ANO StmA, T. Evaluation of an admission control scheme for an ATM network considering fluctuations in cell loss rate. In Proceeding8 of the Conference on Global Communications (GLOBECOM) (Dallas, Texas, Nov. 1989), IEEE, pp. 1774--1780.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.KuttosB, J. On computing per-session performance bounds in high-speed multi-hop computer networks. In Sigmetricz 1991~ (New Port, Rhode Island, June 1992), ACM, pp. 128-139. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.KI.~OSB, J. Open issues and challenges in providing quality of service guarantees in high-speed networks. A CM Computer Communication Review ~$, I (.Jan. 1993), 6-15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.MITRA, D. Optimal design of windows for high speed data networks. In P~oceedings of the Con/erence on Computer Communications (IEEE Infocom) (San Francisco, CA, June 1990), IEEE, pp. 1156-1163.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.MURATA, M., OIE, Y., SUDA, T., AND MIYAHAltA, H. Analysis of a discrete-time single-server queue with bursty inputs for traffic control in ATM networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 8, 3 (Apr. 1990), 447-458.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.OHBA, Y., MUaATA, M., AND MIYAHARA, }I. Analysis of interdeparture processes for bursty traffic in ATM networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 9, 3 (Apr. 1991), 468-476.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22.PAl~_BKtt, A. K., AND GALLAGBP., R. G. A generalized processor sharing approach to flow control in integrated services networks -- the single node case. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Communications (IEEE Infocorn} (Florence, Italy, May 1992), vol. 2, IEEE, pp. 915-924 (7A.3). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.PAI~KH, A. K., AND GALLAGER, R. G. A generalized processor sharing approach to flow control in integrated services networks- the multiple node case. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Communications {IEEE In. focom) (San Francisco, CA, Mar. 1993), voI. 2, 1EEE, pp. 521-530 (SA.1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.PARBKH, A. K. J. A generalized processor sharing approach to fiotv control in integ~ted services nettvorlcz. PhD thcaiz, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, Feb. 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.RASMUSSEN, C., AND SORBNSEN, J. A simple call acceptance procedure in an ATM network. Computer Net. tvorkz and ISDN Systems ttO, 1-5 (Dec. 1990), 197-202. ITC Specialist Seminar, 25-29 September 1989, Adelaide, Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.SAITO, H., AND SHiOMOTO, K. Dynamic call admission control in ATM networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 9, 7 (Sept. 1991), 982-989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.SRIRAM, K., AND WHITT, W. Characterizing superposition arrival processes in packet multiplexers for voice and data. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications $AC-4, 6 (Sept. 1986), 833-846.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.VE~, D. C., ZHANG, H., AND FBntt~I, D. Delay jitter control for real-time communication in a packet switching network. In Proceedings of Tricomm '9i (Chapel Hill, NC, Apr. 1991), IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.WOODRm~F, G. M., A~'O KOSITPAmOON, R. Multimedis traffic management principles for guaranteed ATM network performance, iEEE Journal on Selected A~eas in Communications 8, 3 (Apr. 1990), 437-446.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.YAP. ON, O., ANO SIp{, M. Calculating performance bounds in communication networks. In Proceedings o/ the Conference on Computer Communications (IEEE Infocom) (San Francisco, CA, Mar. 1993), vol. 2, IEEE, pp. sag-s46 (SA.a).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.ZHANG, L. VirtualClock: A new traffic control algorithm for packet-~witchcd networks. A CM Tranzactionz on Computer S!tzternz 9, 2 (May 1991), 101-124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On per-session end-to-end delay distributions and the call admission problem for real-time applications with QOS requirements

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGCOMM '93: Conference proceedings on Communications architectures, protocols and applications
            October 1993
            299 pages
            ISBN:0897916190
            DOI:10.1145/166237
            • cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
              ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 23, Issue 4
              Oct. 1993
              288 pages
              ISSN:0146-4833
              DOI:10.1145/167954
              • Editor:
              • David Oran
              Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 1993 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 October 1993

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate554of3,547submissions,16%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader