Raymond Lister
Tony Clear
Simon
Dennis J. Bouvier
Robert McCartney
Otto Seppälä
Errol Thompson
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
In New Zealand and Australia, the BRACElet project has been investigating students' acquisition of programming skills in introductory programming courses. The project has explored students' skills in basic syntax, tracing code, understanding code, and writing code, seeking to establish the relationships between these skills. This ITiCSE working group report presents the most recent step in the BRACElet project, which includes replication of earlier analysis using a far broader pool of naturally occurring data, refinement of the SOLO taxonomy in code-explaining questions, extension of the taxonomy to code-writing questions, extension of some earlier studies on students' 'doodling' while answering exam questions, and exploration of a further theoretical basis for work that until now has been primarily empirical.
- Baroody, A., Feil, Y., and Johnson, A. (2007). An alternative reconceptualization of procedural and conceptual knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38:2, 115--131.Google Scholar
- Biggs, J. B. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Biggs, J. B. and Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: the SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Byckling, P. and Sajaniemi, J. (2006). Roles of variables and programming skills improvement. SIGCSE Bulletin 38:1, 413--417. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clear, T., Edwards, J., Lister, R., Simon, B., Thompson, E. and Whalley, J. (2008). The teaching of novice computer programmers: bringing the scholarly-research approach to Australia. Tenth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2008), Wollongong, Australia, 63--68. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clear, T., Whalley, J., Lister, R., Carbone, A., Hu, M., Sheard, J., Simon, B. and Thompson, E. (2008). Reliably classifying novice programmer exam results using the SOLO taxonomy. 21st Annual NACCQ Conference, NACCQ, Auckland, New Zealand, 23--30.Google Scholar
- Colburn, T. and Shute, G. (2007). Abstraction in computer science. Minds & Machines 17, 169--184. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K., and Vidakovic, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: beginning with a coordinated process scheme. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 15:2, 167--192.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Denny, P., Luxton-Reilly, A. and Simon, B. (2008). Evaluating a new exam question: Parsons problems. Fourth International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER '08), Sydney, Australia, 113--124. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fincher, S., Lister, R., Clear, T., Robins, A., Tenenberg, J. and Petre, M. (2005). Multi-institutional, multi-national studies in CSEd research: some design considerations and trade-offs. in Anderson, R., Fincher, S. and Guzdial, M. eds. First International Workshop on Computing Education Research, Seattle, WA, USA, 111--121. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gray, E., Pinto, M., Pitta, D., and Tall, D. (1999). Knowledge construction and diverging thinking in elementary and advanced mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics 38, 111--133.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gray, E. and Tall, D. (2007). Abstraction as a natural process of mental compression. Mathematics Education Research Journal 19:2, 23--40.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hattie, J. and Purdie, N. (1998). The SOLO model: addressing fundamental measurement issues. In Dart, B. & Boulton-Lewis, G. M. (Eds.), Teaching and learning in higher education, 145--176. Camberwell, Vic: Australian Council of Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Hiebert, J. and Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: an introductory analysis. In Hiebert, J., ed., Conceptual and procedural knowledge: the case of mathematics, 1--27. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
- Lister R., Adams, E. S., Fitzgerald, S., Fone, W., Hamer, J., Lindholm, M., McCartney, R., Moström, E., Sanders, K., Seppälä, O., Simon, B., and Thomas, L. (2004). A multi national study of reading and tracing skills in novice programmers. SIGCSE Bulletin 36:4, 119--150. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lister, R., Fidge, C., and Teague, D. (2009). Further evidence of a relationship between explaining, tracing and writing skills in introductory programming. 14th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE'09), July 3-8, 2009, Paris, France. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lister, R., Simon, B., Thompson, E., Whalley, J. L., and Prasad, C. (2006). Not seeing the forest for the trees: novice programmers and the SOLO taxonomy. SIGCSE Bulletin 38:3, 118--122. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lopez, M., Whalley, J., Robbins, P., and Lister, R. (2008). Relationships between reading, tracing and writing skills in introductory programming. Fourth International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER '08), Sydney, Australia, 101--112. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McCartney, R., Mostrom, J.E., Sanders, K., and Seppälä, O. (2004). Questions, annotations, and institutions: observations from a study of novice programmers. Fourth Finnish / Baltic Sea Conference on Computer Science Education (Koli Calling 2004), 11--19.Google Scholar
- McCormick, R. (1997). Conceptual and procedural knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7:1-2, 141--159.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Parsons, D. and Haden, P. (2006). Parson's programming puzzles: a fun and effective learning tool for first programming courses. Eighth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2006), Hobart, Australia, 157--163. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pegg, J. (2002). Assessment in mathematics: A developmental approach. In J. M. Royer (Ed.), Mathematical Cognition 227--259. Information Age Publishing: Greenwich, CT, USA.Google Scholar
- Pegg, J. and Tall, D. (2005). The fundamental cycle of concept construction underlying various theoretical frameworks. ZDM 37:6, 468--474.Google Scholar
- Perkins, D. and Martin, F. (1989). Fragile knowledge and neglected strategies in novice programmers. In Soloway, E. and Spohrer, J, Eds., Studying the Novice Programmer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 213--229. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Philpott, A., Robbins, P., and Whalley, J. (2007). Accessing the steps on the road to relational thinking. 20th Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications, Nelson, New Zealand, 286. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rasch, G. (1960/1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Copenhagen, Danish Institute for Educational Research), expanded edition (1980) with foreword and afterword by B.D. Wright. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Robins, A., Rountree, J., and Rountree, N. (2003). Learning and teaching programming: a review and discussion. Computer Science Education 13:2, 137--172.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sfard, A. (1988). Operational vs. structural method of teaching mathematics -- case study. Twelfth Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 2, 560--567. Vesprèm, Hungary: Ferenc Genzwein, OOK.Google Scholar
- Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 1--36.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sheard, J., Carbone, A., Lister, R., Simon, B., Thompson, E., and Whalley, J. L. (2008). Going SOLO to assess novice programmers. SIGCSE Bulletin 40:3, 209--213. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Simon (2009). Code-explaining exam questions: a cautionary note. Ninth International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling 2009).Google Scholar
- Soloway, E. (1986). Learning to program = learning to construct mechanisms and explanations. Communications of the ACM 29:9, 850--858. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Star, J. R. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 36, 401--411.Google Scholar
- Tall, D., (2008). The transition to formal thinking in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal 20:2, 5--24.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thompson, E. (2004). Does the sum of the parts equal the whole? 21st Annual NACCQ Conference, NACCQ, Auckland, New Zealand, 2008, 440--445.Google Scholar
- Thompson, E. (2007). Holistic assessment criteria -- Applying SOLO to programming projects. Ninth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2007), Ballarat, Australia, 155--162. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thompson, E. (2009). How do they understand? Practitioner perceptions of an object-oriented program. Dissertation, Massey University, Palmerston North.Google Scholar
- Venables, A., Tan, G., and Lister, R. (2009) A closer look at tracing, explaining and code writing skills in the novice programmer. Fifth International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER '09), Berkeley, California, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wiedenbeck, S. (1985). Novice/expert differences in programming skills. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 23:4, 383--390. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Whalley, J. L., Lister, R., Thompson, E., Clear, T., Robbins, P., Kumar, P. K. A., and Prasad, C. (2006). An Australasian study of reading and comprehension skills in novice programmers, using the Bloom and SOLO taxonomies. Eighth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2006), Hobart, Australia, 243--252. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Whalley, J. and Lister, R. (2009). The BRACElet 2009.1 (Wellington) Specification. Eleventh Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2009), Wellington, New Zealand, 9--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Whalley, J. and Robbins, P. (2007). Report on the Fourth BRACElet Workshop. Bulletin of Applied Computing and IT. Retrieved June 7, 2007 from http://www.naccq.co.nz/bacit/0501/2007Whalley_BRACELET_Workshop.htm.Google Scholar
- Wright, B.D, and Linacre, J.M. (1994) Reasonable meansquare fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions 8:3, 370.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Naturally occurring data as research instrument: analyzing examination responses to study the novice programmer
Recommendations
A closer look at tracing, explaining and code writing skills in the novice programmer
ICER '09: Proceedings of the fifth international workshop on Computing education research workshopThe way in which novice programmers learn to write code is of considerable interest to computing education researchers. One research approach to understanding how beginners acquire their programming abilities has been to look at student performance in ...
Relationships between reading, tracing and writing skills in introductory programming
ICER '08: Proceedings of the Fourth international Workshop on Computing Education ResearchThis study analyzed student responses to an examination, after the students had completed one semester of instruction in programming. The performance of students on code tracing tasks correlated with their performance on code writing tasks. A ...
Further evidence of a relationship between explaining, tracing and writing skills in introductory programming
ITiCSE '09: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science educationThis paper reports on a replication of earlier studies into a possible hierarchy of programming skills. In this study, the students from whom data was collected were at a university that had not provided data for earlier studies. Also, the students were ...
Comments