skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753498acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Touch-display keyboards: transforming keyboards into interactive surfaces

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In spite of many advances in GUI workstations, the keyboard has remained limited to text entry and basic command invocation. In this work, we introduce the Touch-Display Keyboard (TDK), a novel keyboard that combines the physical-ergonomic qualities of the conventional keyboard with dynamic display and touch-sensing embedded in each key. The TDK effectively transforms the keyboard into an interactive surface that is seamlessly integrated with the interaction space of GUIs, extending graphical output, mouse interaction and three-state input to the keyboard. This gives rise to an entirely new design space of interaction across keyboard, mouse and screen, for which we provide a first systematic analysis in this paper. We illustrate the emerging design opportunities with a host of novel interaction concepts and techniques, and show how these contribute to expressiveness of GUIs, exploration and learning of keyboard interfaces, and interface customization across graphics display and physical keyboard.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p1145.mov

mov

25.9 MB

References

  1. Fingerworks. http://www.fingerworks.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. OLED Display Keyboard, United Keys Inc. http://www.unitedkeys.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Optimus Maximus Keyboard, ArtLebedev Studios. http://www.artlebedev.com/everything/optimus/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. W. Fallot-Burghardt, M. Fjeld, C. Speirs, S. Ziegenspeck, H. Krueger, and T. L¨aubli. Touch&type: a novel pointing device for notebook computers. In Proc. NordiCHI '06, pages 465--468, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Greenberg and M. Boyle. Customizable physical interfaces for interacting with conventional applications. In Proc. UIST '02, pages 31--40, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Grolaux, J. Vanderdonckt, and P.V. Roy. Attach me, detach me, assemble me like you work. In Proc. INTERACT'05, pages 198--212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T. Grossman, P. Dragicevic, and R. Balakrishnan. Strategies for accelerating on-line learning of hotkeys. In Proc. CHI 2007, pages 1591--1600, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. B. Hartmann, M. Ringel Morris, H. Benko, and A.D. Wilson. Augmenting interactive tables with mice & keyboards. In Proc. UIST '09, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Helander. Handbook of Human Computer Interaction. North-Holland, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. E. Hoggan, S.A. Brewster, and J. Johnston. Investigating the effectiveness of tactile feedback for mobile touchscreens. In Proc. CHI '08, pages 1573--1582, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Holleis, J. HAkkilA, and J. Huhtala. Studying applications for touch-enabled mobile phone keypads. In Proc. TEI'08, pages 41--44, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Howes, S.J. Payne, and A. Woodward. The trouble with shortcuts. In CHI '00 Extended Abstracts, pages 267--268, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Isokoski. A minimal device-independent text input method. Technical Report A-1999-14, Department of Computer Science, University of Tampere, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D.M. Lane, H.A. Napier, S.C. Peres, and A. Sandor. Hidden costs of graphical user interfaces: Failure to make the transition from menus and icon toolbars to keyboard shortcuts. In IJHCI, 18(2), pages 133--144, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. H. McLoone, K. Hinckley, and E. Cutrell. Binamual interaction on the microsoft office keyboard. In Proc. Interact '03, pages 49--56, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D.L. Odell, R.C. Davis, A. Smith, and P.K. Wright. Toolglasses, marking menus, and hotkeys: A comparison of one and two-handed command selection techniques. In Proc. Graphics Interface 2004, pages 17--24, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Rekimoto, T. Ishizawa, C. Schwesig, and H. Oba. Presense: interaction techniques for finger sensing input devices. In Proc. UIST '03, pages 203--212, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. Rekimoto, B. Ullmer, and H. Oba. Datatiles: a modular platform for mixed physical and graphical interactions. In Proc. CHI '01, pages 269--276, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. H. Roeber, J. Bacus, and C. Tomasi. Typing in thin air: the canesta projection keyboard -- a new method of interaction with electronic devices. In CHI Extended Abstracts 2003, pages 712--713, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. Sears. Improving touchscreen keyboards: Design issues and a comparison with other devices. In Interacting with Computers, 3(3), pages 253--269, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. W. Stuerzlinger, O. Chapuis, D. Phillips, and N. Roussel. User interface fac¸ades: towards fully adaptable user interfaces. In Proc. UIST '06, pages 309--318, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. C. Tomasi, A. Rafii, and I. Torunoglu. Full-size projection keyboard for handheld devices. In Com. of the ACM, 46(7), pages 70--75, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. M. Weiss, J. Wagner, Y. Jansen, R. Jennings, R. Khoshabeh, J.D. Hollan, and J. Borchers. Slap widgets: Bridging the gap between virtual and physical controls on tabletops. In Proc. CHI '09, pages 481--490, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. J. Zhang and D.A. Norman. Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. In Cognitive Science, 18, pages 87--122, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Touch-display keyboards: transforming keyboards into interactive surfaces

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2010
        2690 pages
        ISBN:9781605589299
        DOI:10.1145/1753326

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 April 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader