skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753511acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Momentum: getting and staying on topic during a brainstorm

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite the prevalent use of group brainstorming for problem solving and decision-making within organizations, brainstorming sessions often lack focus and fail to produce quality ideas. We describe Momentum, a tool that elicits topic-oriented responses prior to a group brainstorm. In an exploratory study, we found qualitative differences in task focus, quality and rate of ideation, and efficiency of storytelling between users and non-users of the tool.

References

  1. Antunes, P., & Ho, T. (2001). The design of a GDSS meeting preparation tool. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10, 5--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Barki, H., & Pinsonneault, A. (2001). Small group brainstorming and idea quality: Is electronic brainstorming the most effective approach? Small Group Research, 32(2), 158--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. David, M., Rosa, M., Santoro, F., & Borges, M. (2006). Considering context elements in pre-meeting systems. Proc. CSCWD 2006, 209--214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Dennis, A., & Valacich, J. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. J. of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 531--537.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. J. of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 497--509.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Dunnette, M., Campbell, J., & Jaastad, K. (1963). Effect of group participation on brainstorming effectiveness for two industrial samples. J. of Applied Psychology, 30--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., & Walker, B. (2004). Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions, 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gerber, E. (2009). Using improvisation to enhance the effectiveness of brainstorming. Proc. CHI '09, 97--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hilliges, O., Terrenghi, L., Boring, S., Kim, D., Richter, H., & Butz, A. (2007). Designing for collaborative problem solving. Proc. Creativity & Cognition, 137--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Nijstad, B., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality & Social Psyc. Rev., 10, 186--213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Osborn, A. (1957). Applied imagination. NY: Scribner.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Pinsonneault, A., Barki, H., Gallupe, R., & Hoppen, N. (1999). Electronic brainstorming: The illusion of productivity. Info. Systems Research, 10(2), 110--133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Shneiderman, B. (2000). Creating creativity: User interfaces for supporting innovation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1), 114--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Steiner, I. (1972). Group processes and productivity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ung, T. (2009). Idea-generation: Exploring a co-creation methodology using online subject matter experts, generative tools, free association, and storytelling during the pre-design phase. Masters Thesis, Ohio State Univ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang, H.-C., Cosley, D., & Fussell, S.R. (in press). Idea Expander: Supporting group brainstorming with conversationally triggered visual thinking stimuli. Proc. CSCW 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Wang, H.-C., Fussell, S.R., & Setlock, L.D. (2009). Cultural difference and adaptation of communication styles in computer--mediated group brainstorming. Proc. CHI 2009, 669--678. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Momentum: getting and staying on topic during a brainstorm

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2010
      2690 pages
      ISBN:9781605589299
      DOI:10.1145/1753326

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 April 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader