skip to main content
10.1145/1753846.1753850acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

The coffee lab: developing a public usability space

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Introducing the Coffee Lab: a novel concept for conducting usability studies in a public space where anyone can experience and evaluate research novel interactive systems. The Coffee Lab serves as a model for the public usability lab, which extends the methods common to laboratory-based usability experiments by adapting prototypes, usability methods, and task interactions to suit different scenarios. Details on the design and implementation of public evaluation methods are discussed, along with a description of the Coffee Lab, and two ongoing public usability tests.

References

  1. L.Bannon, S.Benford, J.Bowers, and C.Heath. Hybrid design creates innovative museum experiences. Commun. ACM, 48(3):62--65,2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. Branje, M. Karam, F. Russo, and D. I. Fels. Enhancing entertainment through a multimodal chair interface. In IEEE Toronto International Conference -- Science and Technology for Humanity, pages 636--641, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. P. Carter. Liberating usability testing. interactions, 14(2):18--22,2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Cosley, J. Baxter, S. Lee, B. Alson, S. Nomura, P. Adams, C. Sarabu, and G. Gay. A tag in the hand: supporting semantic, social, and spatial navigation in museums. In CHI '09, pages 1953--1962, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Cosley, J. Lewenstein, A. Herman, J. Holloway, J.Baxter, S.Nomura, K.Boehner, and G.Gay. Artlinks: fostering social awareness and reflection in museums. In CHI '08, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Czerwinski, E. Horvitz, and S. Wilhite. A diary study of task switching and interruptions. In CHI '04, pages 175--182, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. I. Fels, M. Gerdzhev, E. Hibbard, A. Goodrum, J. Richards, J. Hardman, and N. Thompson. Sign language online with signlink studio 2.0. In UAHCI '09: pages 492--501, 2009. Springer Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. F. Garzotto and F. Rizzo. Interaction paradigms in technology-enhanced social spaces: a case study in museums. In DPPI'07, pages 343--356, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. B. Gaver, T. Dunne, and E. Pacenti. Design: Cultural probes. interactions, 6(1):21--29, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. González, L. Masip, A. Granollers, and M. Oliva. Quantitative analysis in a heuristic evaluation experiment. Adv. Eng. Softw., 40(12):1271--1278, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. G. Iachello, K. N. Truong, G. D. Abowd, G. R. Hayes, and M. Stevens. Prototyping and sampling experience to evaluate ubiquitous computing privacy in the real world. In CHI'06, pages 1009--1018, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Iacucci and K. Kuutti. Everyday life as a stage in creating and performing scenarios for wireless devices. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 6(4):299--306, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M.Karam, G.Nespoli, F.Russo, and D.I. Fels. Modeling perceptual elements of music in a vibrotactile display for deaf users: A field study. ACHI, 0:249--254, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Karam, F. A. Russo, and D. I. Fels. Designing the model human cochlea: An ambient crossmodal audio--tactile display. IEEE Trans. Haptics, 2(3):160--169, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M.Karam and m.c. schraefel. Investigating user tolerance for errors in vision-enabled gesture-based interactions. In AVI '06, pages 225--232, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Kristoffersen and I. Bratteberg. Designing sociable it for public use. In UbiComp '08, pages 252--261, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. G. Lee, D. I. Fels, and J. P. Udo. Emotive captioning. Comput. Entertain., 5(2):11, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. K.M. Scott. Feature -- is usability obsolete? interactions, 16(3):6--11,2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. vom Lehn, J. Hindmarsh, P. Luff, and C. Heath. Engaging constable: revealing art with new technology. In CHI'07, pages 1485--1494, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Centre of Gravity. http://www.centreofgravity.ca/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sideshow Café. http://www.sideshowcafe.caGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The coffee lab: developing a public usability space

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader