skip to main content
10.1145/1806338.1806410acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiiwasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Usability requirements for COTS based systems

Published:14 December 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Component-based software development (CBSD) aims at building software systems by searching, selecting and integrating commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components. The effective selection of COTS components that meet the user's requirements and expectations is a non-trivial task. Many published papers consider functional requirements while ignoring usability requirements. In this paper, we have proposed a selection process approach (SPA), which allows an effective selection of the COTS components while minimizing the cost and assuring the satisfaction of hardware, software and user usability requirements. SPA includes requirement solver (RS), an automated tool to assess requirement engineers to select components that creates a functioning computer system. RS optimizes the solution using Simulated Annealing (SA) to search the design space to match, rank, select and integrate COTS components with a maximal satisfaction while neither exceeding a given budget nor violating user and performance constraints. Our computational results based on building a computer for a child handwriting e-learning application show feasibility of SPA in finding solution satisfying all constraints while reducing the cost by 58%.

References

  1. ISO/IEC (1998) 9241--11 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDT)--Part 11 Guidance on usability. ISO/IEC 9241--11:1998 (E).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Metropolis, N., Ulam, S., 1949. "The Monte Carlo Method". Journal of the American Statistical Association 44 (247): pp 335--341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Kirkpatrick, S.; Gelatt, C. D., Vecchi, M. P., 1983. "Optimization by Simulated Annealing." Science. 220 (4598): pp 671--680.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Sauro J., and Kindlund E., 2005. "A method to standardize usability metrics into a single score," Proceedings of CHI 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ncube, C., Maiden, N. A. M., 1999. "PORE: Procurement-Oriented Requirements Engineering Method for the Component-Based Systems Engineering Development Paradigm", International Workshop on Component-Based Software Engineering, pp 130--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Alves, C. Finkelstein, A. 2002. "Challenges in COTS decision-making: a goal-driven requirements engineering perspective", Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Software engineering and knowledge engineering, pp. 789--794, Ischia, Italy. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cheng, B. H. C., Atlee, J. M., 2007, "Research Directions in Requirements Engineering", Proceedings of IEEE ICSE Future of Software Engineering, pp. 285--303, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Alves, C., Franch, X., Carvallo, J. P., Finkelstein, A. 2005. "Using Goals and Quality Models to Support the Matching Analysis during COTS Selection." Proceedings of ICCBSS 2005, pp. 146--156, Bilbao, Spain. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Franch, X., Torchiano, M., 2005. "Towards a reference framework for COTS-based development: a proposal," ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, Proceedings of MPEC '05, 30 (4), pp. 1--4, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Chung, L. Cooper, K., 2004, "Matching, Ranking, and Selecting Components: A COTS-Aware Requirements Engineering and Software Architecture Approach," Proceedings of MPEC '04 pp. 41--44. Edinburgh, Scotland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Tsumaki, T., Tamai, T., 2005, "A Framework for Matching Requirements Engineering Techniques to Project Characteristics and Situation Changes," Proceedings of SREP'05, pp. 45--55, Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kotonya, G., Hutchinson, J., 2005, "Analyzing the impact of change in COTS-based systems," Proceedings of ICCBSS 2005, pp. 212--222, Bilbao, Spain. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Bertoa M., Troya J. and Vallecillo A., 2006, "Measuring the usability of software components, Journal of Systems and Software," 79 (3), pp 427--439. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Chung, L., Nixon, B., Yu, E., and Mylopoulos, J., 2000, "Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering," Kluwer Academic Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Usability requirements for COTS based systems

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            iiWAS '09: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services
            December 2009
            763 pages
            ISBN:9781605586601
            DOI:10.1145/1806338

            Copyright © 2009 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 14 December 2009

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • short-paper

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader