skip to main content
10.1145/1815961.1816004acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiscaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Energy proportional datacenter networks

Published:19 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Numerous studies have shown that datacenter computers rarely operate at full utilization, leading to a number of proposals for creating servers that are energy proportional with respect to the computation that they are performing.

In this paper, we show that as servers themselves become more energy proportional, the datacenter network can become a significant fraction (up to 50%) of cluster power. In this paper we propose several ways to design a high-performance datacenter network whose power consumption is more proportional to the amount of traffic it is moving -- that is, we propose energy proportional datacenter networks.

We first show that a flattened butterfly topology itself is inherently more power efficient than the other commonly proposed topology for high-performance datacenter networks. We then exploit the characteristics of modern plesiochronous links to adjust their power and performance envelopes dynamically. Using a network simulator, driven by both synthetic workloads and production datacenter traces, we characterize and understand design tradeoffs, and demonstrate an 85% reduction in power --- which approaches the ideal energy-proportionality of the network.

Our results also demonstrate two challenges for the designers of future network switches: 1) We show that there is a significant power advantage to having independent control of each unidirectional channel comprising a network link, since many traffic patterns show very asymmetric use, and 2) system designers should work to optimize the high-speed channel designs to be more energy efficient by choosing optimal data rate and equalization technology. Given these assumptions, we demonstrate that energy proportional datacenter communication is indeed possible.

References

  1. Jung Ho Ahn, Nathan Binkert, Al Davis, Moray McLaren, and Robert S. Schreiber. HyperX: topology, routing, and packaging of efficient large-scale networks. In SC '09: Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing Networking, Storage and Analysis, pages 1--11. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mohammad Al-Fares, Alexander Loukissas, and Amin Vahdat. A scalable, commodity data center network architecture. In SIGCOMM '08: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2008 Conference on Data Communication, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Luiz André Barroso and Urs Hölzle. The case for energy-proportional computing. Computer, 40(12):33--37, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Luiz André Barroso and Urs Hölzle. The Datacenter as a Computer: An Introduction to Design of Warehouse-scale Machines. Morgan Claypool, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Borthakur, Dhruba. The Hadoop distributed file system: Architecture and design. http://hadoop.apache.org/common/docs/r0.18.0/hdfs_design.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Sanjay Ghemawat, Howard Gobioff, and Shun-Tak Leung. The Google file system. In 19th ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Albert Greenberg, James R. Hamilton, Navendu Jain, Srikanth Kandula, Changhoon Kim, Parantap Lahiri, David A. Maltz, Parveen Patel, and Sudipta Sengupta. Vl2: a scalable and flexible data center network. In SIGCOMM '09: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2009 Conference on Data Communication, pages 51--62, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chamara Gunaratne, Kenneth Christensen, Bruce Nordman, and Stephen Suen. Reducing the energy consumption of ethernet with Adaptive Link Rate (ALR). IEEE Trans. Comput., 57:448--461, April 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Chuanxiong Guo, Guohan Lu, Dan Li, Haitao Wu, Xuan Zhang, Yunfeng Shi, Chen Tian, Yongguang Zhang, and Songwu Lu. BCube: A high performance, server-centric network architecture for modular data centers. In SIGCOMM '09: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2009 Conference on Data Communication, pages 63--74, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. H. Hatamkhani and Yang C-K.K. A study of the optimal data rate for minimum power of I/Os. In IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, pages 1230--1234, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Brandon Heller, Srini Seetharaman, Priya Mahadevan, Yiannis Yiakoumis, Puneet Sharma, Sujata Banerjee, and Nick McKeown. Elastictree: Saving energy in data cneter networks. In Proceedings of the 7th USENIX Symposium on Networked System Design and Implementation (NSDI), pages 249--264. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Google Inc. Efficient computingâ step 2: efficient datacenters. http://www.google.com/corporate/green/datacenters/step2.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Nan Jiang, John Kim, and William J. Dally. Indirect adaptive routing on large scale interconnection networks. In ISCA '09: Proceedings of the 36th annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pages 220--231, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. John Kim, William J. Dally, and Dennis Abts. Adaptive routing in high-radix clos network. In SC '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, page 92, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. John Kim, William J. Dally, and Dennis Abts. Flattened butterfly: a cost-efficient topology for high-radix networks. In ISCA '07: Proceedings of the 34th annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pages 126--137, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. John Kim, William J. Dally, Brian Towles, and Amit K. Gupta. Microarchitecture of a high-radix router. In ISCA '05: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pages 420--431, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Charles E. Leiserson. Fat-trees: universal networks for hardware-efficient supercomputing. IEEE Trans. Comput., 34(10):892--901, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jian Li, Lixin Zhang, Charles Lefurgy, Richard Treumann, and Wolfgang E. Denzel. Thrifty interconnection network for hpc systems. In ICS '09: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Supercomputing, pages 505--506, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Priya Mahadevan, Puneet Sharma, Sujata Banerjee, and Parthasarathy Ranganathan. Energy aware network operations. In INFOCOM'09: Proceedings of the 28th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications Workshops, pages 25--30, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Radhika Niranjan Mysore, Andreas Pamboris, Nathan Farrington, Nelson Huang, Pardis Miri, Sivasankar Radhakrishnan, Vikram Subramanya, and Amin Vahdat. Portland: a scalable fault-tolerant layer 2 data center network fabric. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 39(4):39--50, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rambus Corporation. http://www.rambus.com/us/patents/innovations/detail/low_power_multi_gbps.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. S. Scott and G. Thorson. The Cray T3E Network: Adaptive Routing in a High Performance 3D Torus. In Hot Interconnects 4, Aug. 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Steve Scott, Dennis Abts, John Kim, and William J. Dally. The blackwidow high-radix clos network. In ISCA '06: Proceedings of the 33rd annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pages 16--28, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sun Microsystems. Lustre file system. http://www.sun.com/software/products/lustre/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. U.S. Department of Energy. Average retail price of electricity. http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/table5_6_a.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Report to congress on server and datacenter energy efficiency. Public Law 109-431, August 2, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Energy proportional datacenter networks

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ISCA '10: Proceedings of the 37th annual international symposium on Computer architecture
            June 2010
            520 pages
            ISBN:9781450300537
            DOI:10.1145/1815961
            • cover image ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News
              ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News  Volume 38, Issue 3
              ISCA '10
              June 2010
              508 pages
              ISSN:0163-5964
              DOI:10.1145/1816038
              Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2010 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 19 June 2010

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate543of3,203submissions,17%

            Upcoming Conference

            ISCA '24

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader