skip to main content
10.1145/1822018.1822031acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseicsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sketched menu: a tabletop-menu technique for GUI object creation

Published:19 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe the Sketched Menu, a menu technique for launching Graphical User Interface (GUI) objects in a tabletop interface. The Sketched Menu enables the user to define interactively the shape, size, orientation, and location of a new GUI object before it is launched. These parameters are specified implicitly by the user via a shape drawing. The shape corresponds to a simplified outline of the object. A menu for the given shape is launched at the exact location of the drawing and the user can then select the desired graphical object or application. A laboratory experiment was conducted to compare this new menu technique with the traditional pop-up-menu approach. The results show that the time to create an object and the positioning accuracy are similar for the two techniques. There are two advantages to using the Sketched Menu. Firstly, graphical discontinuities are avoided when adding objects to the interface. Secondly, because the object appears exactly in the desired location and orientation, it does not hide other graphical objects, thereby reducing disruption to other users' tasks.

References

  1. Bailly, G., Demeure,A., Lecolinet, E., and Nigay, L. 2008. MultiTouch menu (MTM). In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine (IHM '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 165--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Beaudouin-Lafon, M. 2001. Novel interaction techniques for overlapping windows. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User interface Software and Technology (Orlando, Florida, November 11-14, 2001). UIST '01. ACM, New York, NY, 153--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dietz, P. and Leigh, D. 2001. DiamondTouch: a multi-user touch technology. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User interface Software and Technology (Orlando, Florida, November 11-14, 2001). UIST '01. ACM, New York, NY, 219--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dragicevic, P. and Shi, Y. 2009. Visualizing and Manipulating Automatic Document Orientation Methods Using Vector Fields, In Proceedings of Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces conference (Banff, Canada, November 23-25, 2009) ITS'09. ACM, New York, 65--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fitts, P. M. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 47, no. 6, 381--391, June 1954. Available: http://view.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13174710Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Hinrichs, U., Carpendale, S., and Scott, S. D. 2005. Interface currents: supporting fluent face-to-face collaboration. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Sketches (Los Angeles, California, July 31-August 04, 2005). J. Buhler, Ed. SIGGRAPH '05. ACM, New York, NY, 142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hyman, R. 1953. Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45(3), 188--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Isenberg, T., Nix, S., Schwarz, M., Miede, A., Scott, S.D., and Carpendale, S. 2008. Mobile Spatial Tools for Fluid Interaction. In Extended Abstracts of IEEE Workshop on Tabletop and Interactive Surfaces, October 1-3, 2008, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ISO, 2002. Reference Number: ISO 9241-9:2000(E), Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs)--Part 9: Requirements for Non-Keyboard input Devices.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jangho, L. and Jee-In, K. 2006. u-Table: A Tabletop Interface for Multiple Users. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and its Applications (Glasgow, UK, May 8-11, 2006), 983--992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kruger, R., Carpendale, S., Scott, S. D., and Greenberg, S. 2003. How people use orientation on tables: comprehension, coordination and communication. In Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, November 09-12, 2003). GROUP '03. ACM, New York, NY, 369--378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kruger, R., Carpendale, S., Scott, S. D., and Greenberg, S. 2004. Roles of Orientation in Tabletop Collaboration: Comprehension, Coordination and Communication. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work 13, 5-6 (Dec. 2004), 501--537. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kruger, R., Carpendale, S., Scott, S. D., and Tang, A. 2005. Fluid integration of rotation and translation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, Oregon, USA, April 02-07, 2005). CHI'05. ACM, New York, NY, 601--610. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. LaStrange, T. 1989. An Overview of twm (Tom's Window Manager), Available: www.lastrange.com/work/twm.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Leithinger, D., Haller, M. 2007. Improving Menu Interaction for Cluttered Tabletop Setups with User-Drawn Path Menus, In Proceedings of the Second Annual IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP'07). October 10-12, Newport, Rhode Island, 121--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Morris, M. R., Morris, D., and Winograd, T. 2004. Individual audio channels with single display groupware: effects on communication and task strategy. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Chicago, Illinois, USA, November 06-10, 2004). CSCW '04. ACM, New York, NY, 242--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ryall, K., Forlines, C., Shen, C., and Morris, M. R. 2004. Exploring the effects of group size and table size on interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Chicago, Illinois, USA, November 06-10, 2004). CSCW '04. ACM, New York, NY, 284--293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Rekimoto, J. and Saitoh, M. 1999. Augmented surfaces: a spatially continuous work space for hybrid computing environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: the CHI Is the Limit (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, May 15-20, 1999). CHI '99. ACM, New York, NY, 378--385. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Scott, S.D. and Carpendale, S. 2006. Investigating Tabletop Territoriality in Digital Tabletop Workspaces, Technical Report 2006-836-29, Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sezgin, T. M., Stahovich, T., and Davis, R. 2007. Sketch based interfaces: early processing for sketch understanding. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 Courses (San Diego, California, August 05-09, 2007). SIGGRAPH '07. ACM, New York, NY, 37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Shen, C., Lesh, N., Moghaddam, B., Beardsley, P., and Bardsley, R. S. 2001. Personal digital historian: user interface design. In CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, Washington, March 31-April 05, 2001). CHI '01. ACM, New York, NY, 29--30 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Shen, C., Vernier, F. D., Forlines, C., and Ringel, M. 2004. DiamondSpin: an extensible toolkit for around-the-table interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vienna, Austria, April 24-29, 2004). CHI '04. ACM, New York, NY, 167--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Szymanski R., Goldin M., Palmer N., Beckinger R., Gilday J., Chase T. 2008. Command and Control in Multi-touch Environment, In Proceedings of the Army Science Conference (December 1-4 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Vernier, F., Lesh, N., and Shen, C. 2002. Visualization techniques for circular tabletop interfaces. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual interfaces (Trento, Italy, May 22-24, 2002). M. De Marsico, S. Levialdi, and E. Panizzi, Eds. AVI '02. ACM, New York, NY, 257--265. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Wobbrock, J. O., Wilson, A. D., and Li, Y. 2007. Gestures without libraries, toolkits or training: a $1 recognizer for user interface prototypes. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Symposium on User interface Software and Technology (Newport, Rhode Island, USA, October 07-10, 2007). UIST '07. ACM, New York, NY, 159--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Sketched menu: a tabletop-menu technique for GUI object creation

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              EICS '10: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems
              June 2010
              390 pages
              ISBN:9781450300834
              DOI:10.1145/1822018

              Copyright © 2010 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 19 June 2010

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate73of299submissions,24%

              Upcoming Conference

              EICS '24

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader