Debbie Corder
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Virtual collaboration requires competencies such as effective communication, and the ability to build trust and understanding to create a community with common aims. Virtual collaboration with other cultures also requires development of intercultural competence. Individuals need to understand cultural differences that determine behaviour, successful teamwork and outcomes. They must also be able to notice, reflect and critically analyse, and be aware of their own cultural identity, beliefs and assumptions. Research has identified issues that can arise in global virtual collaboration. This paper discusses these issues and the integration of Second Life to enhance virtual collaborative projects. It explores the advantages of avatar-based human interaction and experiences that enable engagement in real-time realistic activities, and using the interaction and experiences to develop virtual collaboration competencies, including intercultural competence. Based on trialling student exchanges in an intercultural competence course, technical and pedagogical issues relating to competence development are discussed, along with the relevance to computer sciences, and possible inter-disciplinary collaboration to facilitate the development of intercultural competence.
- Atkins, C. and Caukill, M. 2009. Serious fun and serious learning: the Challenge of Second Life. In Learning and teaching in the virtual world of Second Life, J. Molka-Danielsen and M. Deutschmann, Eds. Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim, 78--89.Google Scholar
- Barnes, D. 1992. From communication to curriculum. Boynton/Cook Publishers, Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH.Google Scholar
- Bayne, S. 2008. Uncanny spaces for higher education: teaching and learning in virtual worlds. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 16, 3, 197--205.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bennett, M. J. 2004. Becoming interculturally competent. In Toward multiculturalism: A reader in multicultural education (2nd Edition), J. Wurzel, Ed. Intercultural Resource Corporation, Newton, MA, 62--77.Google Scholar
- Byram, M. 1997. Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon.Google Scholar
- Callen, D. 2008. How Intercultural Competence Drives Success in Global Virtual Teams. Leveraging global virtual teams through intercultural curiosity, sensitivity, and respect. Graziadio Business Report, a journal of relevant information and analysis. Pepperdine University, 11, 8. http://gbr.pepperdine.edu/084/studentpaperwinner.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Cant, A. G. 2004. Internationalizing the business curriculum: developing intercultural competence. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 5, 1/2, 177--182.Google Scholar
- Corder, D. and U, A. 2009. Student cultural exchanges in Second Life. Global Intercultural Collaboration: A workshop exploring interdisciplinary dimensions of globalisation, collaboration and culture. Auckland University of Technology. http://online.aut.ac.nz/tony/2009/CGIC.nsf/HomePage?OpenPageGoogle Scholar
- Dekker, D. M., Rutte, C. G. and Van den Berg, P. T. 2008. Global differences in the perception of critical interaction behaviors in global virtual teams. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 441--452.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Diehl, W. C. and Prins, E. 2008. Unintended outcomes in Second Life: intercultural literacy and cultural identity in a virtual world. Language and Intercultural Communication, 8, 2.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Evans, N., Mulvihill, M. and Brooks, N, J. 2008. Mediating the tensions of online learning with Second Life. Innovate, 4, 6. http://innovateonline.info/index.php?view=issue&id=27Google Scholar
- Fielden, J. 2007. Global horizons for UK universities. The Council for Industry and Higher Education. http://www.cihe-uk.com/docs/PUBS/0707GLOBAL.pdf.Google Scholar
- Good, J., Howland, K. and Thackray, L. 2008. Problem-based learning spanning real and virtual worlds: a case study in Second Life. ALTJ. Research in Learning Technology, 16, 3, 163--172.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hall, E. T. 1977. Beyond Culture. Anchor, Garden City, NZ.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's consequences: comparing vales, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, 2nd Edition. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, U.S.Google Scholar
- Humphrey, D. 2007. Intercultural Communication Competence: The State of Knowledge. Report prepared for CILT, The National Centre for Language Development of NOS in intercultural Skills Project. http://www.123people.co.uk/s/donna+humphreyGoogle Scholar
- Irwin, C. and Berge, Z. I. 2006. Socialization in the online classroom. e-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology 9, 1, 1--7.Google Scholar
- Janssens, M. and Brett, J. M. 2006. Cultural intelligence in global teams: a fusion model of collaboration. Group and Organization Management, 31,1, 124--153.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jarvenpaa, S. L. and Leidner, D. E. 1998. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3, 4. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue4/jarvenpaa.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Koehn, P., and Rosenau, J. 2002. Transnational competence in an emergent epoch. International Studies Perspectives, 3, 105--127.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kohonen, V. 2005. Experiential learning, intercultural learning and teacher development in foreign language education. In Multicultural communities, multilingual practice, J. Smeds, K. Sarmavuori, E. Laakkonen, and R. de Cillia, Eds. Turku: Annales Universitatis Turkuensis B 285, 123--135.Google Scholar
- Kolb, D. 1984. Experiential learning. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
- Laurillard, D. 2002. Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies. 2nd Edition. RoutledgeFalmer, London.Google Scholar
- Lustig, M. and Koester, J. 2006. Intercultural competence: interpersonal communication across cultures. Pearson, Boston.Google Scholar
- McLoughlin, C. and Lee, M. J. 2008. Future Learning Landscapes: Transforming pedagogy through social software. Innovate, 4, 5. http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=539Google Scholar
- Meyer, J. H. F. and Land, R. 2005. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49, 3, 373--388.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Minocha, S. and Roberts, D. 2008. Laying the groundwork for socialisation and knowledge construction within 3D virtual worlds. ALT-J Research in Learning Technology, 16, 3, 181--196.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Oertig, M. and Buergi, T. 2006. The Challenges of Managing Cross-Cultural Virtual Project Teams. Team Performance Management, 12, 1/2, 23--30.Google Scholar
- Salt, B., Atkins, C. and Blackall, L. 2008. Engaging with Second Life: Real Education in a Virtual World. Literature Review. http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:kwjxvqTrl7YJ:slenz.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/slliteraturereviewa1.pdf+Swaine,+C.,+2007.+Core+Skills+Competency+Framework.&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnkGoogle Scholar
- Savin-Baden, M. 2008. From cognitive capability to social reform? Shifting perceptions of learning in immersive virtual worlds. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 16, 3, 151--161.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schneider, S., B. and Evans, M., A. 2008. Transforming e-Learning into e-Learning: The centrality of sociocultural participation. Innovate, 5, 1. http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=511Google Scholar
- Swaine, C. 2007. Core Skills Competency Framework http://www.sleducationuk.net/vle/file.php/2/Education_UK_Island.core_skills.competency-framework.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Wheeler, M. and Salmon, G. 2008a. Second Life: guide for learning group participants. Prepared for the MOOSE project; draft 4. University of Lancaster. http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/beyond-distance-research-alliance/projects/moose/moose-blog/participantsmaster.pdf/viewGoogle Scholar
- Wheeler, M. and Salmon, G. 2008b. Second Life: Training Guide. Prepared for the MOOSE project; draft 4. University of Lancaster. http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/beyond-distance-research-alliance/projects/moose/moose-blog/moderatormaster.pdf/viewGoogle Scholar
- Yee, N. and Bailenson, J. 2007. The proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33, 271--290.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Lai, B. Y. C. and Tan, H. S. 2005. What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on distance education. Teachers College Record, 107, 1836--1884.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Integrating Second Life to enhance global intercultural collaboration projects
Recommendations
Intercultural interaction and collaboration in a virtual world
ICIC '10: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Intercultural collaborationThis is preliminary research as to whether cross-cultural interactions or collaboration within a virtual world hinders or promotes cultural understanding or interest.
The Use of Virtual Worlds for Developing Intercultural Competences
In this research, the authors present a framework for developing Intercultural Competence IC and use Tridimensional Digital Virtual Worlds 3DVW as environments for developing Intercultural Competence. They developed an artifact, via Design Research, ...
Scaffolding wiki-supported collaborative learning for small-group projects and whole-class collaborative knowledge building
While educators value wikis' potential, wikis may fail to support collaborative constructive learning without careful scaffolding. This article proposes literature-based instructional methods, revised based on two expert instructors' input, presents the ...
Comments