skip to main content
10.1145/1840784.1840830acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiiixConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Exploring web browsing context for collaborative question answering

Published:18 August 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Collaborative Question Answering (CQA) sites such as Yahoo! Answers and recent real-time CQA sites such as Aardvark, provide a promising approach for information seeking. Yet, the behavior of the answerers, especially the factors influencing the quality and timeliness of the answers, are not well understood. We hypothesize that the information context of the answerer at the time a question is received is an important factor in the effectiveness of CQA systems. As a first step in exploring this hypothesis, our study shows that the relevant web browsing context can have significant positive effects on the answerers' reported ability, effort, and willingness to answer questions.

References

  1. Guo, J., Xu, S., Bao, S., and Yu, Y. 2008. Tapping on the potential of Q&A community by recommending answer providers. In Proc. of CIKM '08. 921--930. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Qu, M., Qiu, G., He, X., Zhang, C., Wu, H., Bu, J., and Chen, C. 2009. Probabilistic question recommendation for question answering communities. In Proc. of WWW '09. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Adamic, L. A., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E., and Ackerman, M. S. 2008. Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: everyone knows something. In Proc. of WWW '08. 665--674. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Agichtein, E., Castillo, C., Donato, D., Gionis, A., and Mishne, G. 2008. Finding high-quality content in social media. In Proc. of WSDM '08. 183--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Liu, Y., Bian, J., and Agichtein, E. 2008. Predicting information seeker satisfaction in community question answering. In Proc. of SIGIR '08. 483--490. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Nam, K. K., Ackerman, M. S. and Adamic, L. A. 2009. Questions in, knowledge in?: a study of naver's question answering community. In Proc. of CHI '09. 779--788. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hsieh, G. and Counts, S. 2009. mimir: a market-based real-time question and answer service. In Proc. of CHI '09. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Harper, F. M., Raban, D., Rafaeli, S., and Konstan, J. A. 2008. Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites. In Proc. of CHI '08. 865--874. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Horvitz, E. and Apacible, J. 2003. Learning and reasoning about interruption. In Proc. of the 5th international Conference on Multimodal interfaces. ICMI '03. 20--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hudson, S., Fogarty, J., Atkeson, C., Avrahami, D., Forlizzi, J., Kiesler, S., Lee, J., and Yang, J. 2003. Predicting human interruptibility with sensors: a Wizard of Oz feasibility study. In Proc. of CHI '03. 257--26 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Adomavicius, G. and Tuzhilin, A. 2008. Context-aware recommender systems. In Proc. of RecSys '08. 335--336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring web browsing context for collaborative question answering

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          IIiX '10: Proceedings of the third symposium on Information interaction in context
          August 2010
          408 pages
          ISBN:9781450302470
          DOI:10.1145/1840784

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 18 August 2010

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate21of45submissions,47%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader