skip to main content
10.1145/1841853.1841880acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Translating politeness across cultures: case of Hindi and English

Published:19 August 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a corpus based study of politeness across two languages-English and Hindi. It studies the politeness in a translated parallel corpus of Hindi and English and sees how politeness in a Hindi text is translated into English. We provide a detailed theoretical background in which the comparison is carried out, followed by a brief description of the translated data within this theoretical model. Since politeness may become one of the major reasons of conflict and misunderstanding, it is a very important phenomenon to be studied and understood cross-culturally, particularly for such purposes as machine translation.

References

  1. Bousfield, Derek. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, P. & Levinson, S. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Culpeper, Jonathan. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25 (1996), 349--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield and Anne Wichmann. Impoliteness revisited: with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 35 (2003), 1545--1579.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Eelen, G. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Escandell-Vidal, Victoria. Towards a cognitive approach to politeness. Language Sciences, 18:3--4 (1996), 629--650.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fukada, Atsushi & Noriko Asato. Universal politeness theory: application to the use of Japanese honorifics. Journal of Pragmatics, 36 (2004), 1991--2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ide, S. Linguistic politeness, III: linguistic politeness and universality, Multilingua, 12:1 (1993).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Lakoff, R. The logic of politeness; or minding your p's and q's. Chicago Linguistics Society, 8 (1973), 292--305.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Leech, Geoffrey. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Meier, A.J. Passages of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 24 (1995), 381--392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. O'Driscoll, Jim. About face: A defence and elaboration of universal dualism. Journal of Pragmatics, 25 (1996), 1--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Pfister, Jonas. Is there a need for a maxim of politeness? Journal of Pragmatics (2009). Manuscript Submitted for Publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Watts, Richard J. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Wierzbicka, A. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. The Semantics of Human Interaction. Mouton-De Gruyter, Berlin, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Translating politeness across cultures: case of Hindi and English

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ICIC '10: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Intercultural collaboration
        August 2010
        300 pages
        ISBN:9781450301084
        DOI:10.1145/1841853

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 August 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        ICIC '10 Paper Acceptance Rate47of77submissions,61%Overall Acceptance Rate47of77submissions,61%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader