skip to main content
10.1145/1851600.1851636acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobilehciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Off the beaten track: a mobile field study exploring the long tail of tourist recommendations

Published:07 September 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a field study of a framework for personalized mobile recommendations in the tourism domain, of sight-seeing Points of Interest (POI). We evaluate the effectiveness, satisfaction and divergence from popularity of a knowledge-based personalization strategy comparing it to recommending most popular sites. We found that participants visited more of the recommended POIs for lists with popular but non-personalized recommendations. In contrast, the personalized recommendations led participants to visit more POIs overall and visit places "off the beaten track". The level of satisfaction between the two conditions was comparable and high, suggesting that our participants were just as happy with the rarer, "off the beaten track" recommendations and their overall experience. We conclude that personalized recommendations set tourists into a discovery mode with an increased chance for serendipitous findings, in particular for returning tourists.

References

  1. Android location manager. Last retrieved Dec. 2009. http://developer.android.com/reference/android/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Api call to getpoi. Last retrieved Dec. 2009. Anonymized.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Geocoder. Last retrieved Dec. 2009. http://code.google.com/apis/maps/ documentation/services.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Personalization questionnaire. http://78.46.87.99/tourist/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Post-questionnaire. http://78.46.87.99/tourist/postQnaire.doc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Pre-questionnaire. http://78.46.87.99/tourist/preQnaire.doc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Reality mining at MIT. Last retrieved Dec. 2009. http://reality.media.mit.edu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ski-europe. Last retrieved Dec. 2009. http://www.ski-europe.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Travel ontology. Last retrieved Dec. 2009. http://www.schemaweb.info/schema/ SchemaDetails.aspx?id=236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tripsay. Last retrieved Dec. 2009. http://www.tripsay.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. W3c geolocation api. Last retrieved Dec. 2009. http://dev.w3.org/geo/api/spec-source.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wikipedia. Last retrieved Dec. 2009. http://en.wikipedia.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. G. D. Abowd, C. G. Atkeson, J. Hong, S. Long, R. Kooper, and M. Pinkerton. Cyberguide: A mobile context guide. In ACM Wireless Networks, pages 421--433, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. C. Anderson. The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More. Hyperion, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. L. Ardissono, A. Goy, G. Petrone, M. Segnan, and P. Torasso. Intrigue: Personalized recommendation of tourist attractions for desktop and handset devices. In Applied Artifical Intelligence, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Bilgic and R. J. Mooney. Explaining recommendations: Satisfaction vs. promotion. In Proceedings of the Workshop Beyond Personalization, in conjunction with the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 13--18, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. F. Bohnert and I. Zukerman. Non-intrusive personalisation of the museum experience. In UMAP, pages 197--209, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Braun and A. Scherp. Collaborative poi. Last retrieved Dec. 2009. http://isweb.uni-koblenz.de/Research/systeme/csxPOI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. K. Cheverest, N. Davies, K. Mitchel, A. Friday, and C. Efstratiou. Developing a context-aware electronic tourist guide: Some issues and experiences. In CHI Letters, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. K. Church, J. Neumann, M. Cherubin, and N. Oliver. Socialsearchbrowser: A novel mobile search and information discovery tool. In In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Delgado and R. Davidson. Knowledge bases and user profiling in travel and hospitality recommender systems. In Proceedings of the ENTER 2002 Conference,, pages pp. 1--16, Innsbruck, Austria, January 22-25 2002. Springer Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. A. Felfernig, S. Gordea, D. Jannach, E. Teppan, and M. Zanker. A short survey of recommendation technologies in travel and tourism. ÖGAI Journal, 25:17==22, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. D. Jannach and K. Hegelich. A case study on the effectiveness of recommendations in the mobile internet. In Conference on Recommender systems, pages 205--208, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. J. A. Konstan, B. N. Miller, D. Maltz, J. L. Herlocker, L. R. Gordon, and J. Riedl. Grouplens: Applying collaborative filtering to usenet news. Communications of the ACM, 40(3):77--87, Mar. 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. Masthoff. Group modeling: Selecting a sequence of television items to suit a group of viewers. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 14:37--85, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. D. McSherry. Explanation in recommender systems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 24(2):179--197, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. M. Perrero, F. Antonelli, and M. Geymonat. Recommendation on tv: What do users want? a user study. In Recommender-based Industrial Applications Workshop in association with the conference on Recommender Systems, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. D. Rowland, M. F. L. Oppermann, J. Marshall, A. C. andBoriana Koleva, S. Benford, and C. Perez. Ubikequitous computing: Designing interactive experiences for cyclists. In MobileHCI, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. M. van Setten, S. Pokraev, and J. Koolwaaji. Context-aware recommendations in the mobile tourist application compass. In Adaptive Hypermedia, pages 235--244, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. R. van Zwol and B. Sigurbj¨ornsson. Faceted exploration of image search results. In WWW, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Waszkiewicz, Cunnigham, and Byrne. Case-based personal travel agent. In International Conference on User Modeling, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. C.-N. Ziegler, S. M. McNee, J. A. Konstan, and G. Lausen. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In WWW'05, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Off the beaten track: a mobile field study exploring the long tail of tourist recommendations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MobileHCI '10: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services
      September 2010
      552 pages
      ISBN:9781605588353
      DOI:10.1145/1851600
      • General Chairs:
      • Marco de Sá,
      • Luís Carriço,
      • Program Chair:
      • Nuno Correia

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 September 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      MobileHCI '10 Paper Acceptance Rate46of225submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate202of906submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader