skip to main content
10.1145/1864431.1864491acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Improving trust in context-aware applications with intelligibility

Published:26 September 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Since context-aware applications use implicit sensing and increasingly complex decision making, they may make mistakes or users may misunderstand their actions. This may hinder trust and adoption of context-aware applications. We hypothesize that making these applications intelligible by explaining themselves to users would help counter this lack of trust. The proposed thesis would contribute to context-aware computing by (i) understanding the need to explain these applications to users, (ii) understanding the benefits and trade-offs of providing intelligibility, and (iii) providing toolkit support intelligibility to ultimately improve the trust, adoption of, and sustained use context-aware systems.

References

  1. }}Assad, M. et al. (2007). PersonisAD: Distributed, Active, Scrutable Model Framework for Context-Aware Services. Pervasive 07, 55--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. }}Bellotti, V. & Edwards, W.K. (2001). Intelligibility and Accountability: Human Considerations in Context-Aware Systems, Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2-4): 193--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. }}Cassens, J. (2008). Explanation Awareness and Ambient Intelligence as Social Technologies. Ph.D. thesis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. }}Cheverst, K.. et al. (2005). Exploring issues of user model transparency and proactive behavior in an office environment control system. UMUAI 05, 15(3-4), 235--273. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. }}Dey, A.K., Abowd, G.D. & Salber, D. (2001). A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2-4): 97--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. }}Dey, A. K. & Newberger, A. (2009). Support for context-aware intelligibility and control. CHI 09, 859--868. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. }}Ko, A. J. & Myers, B. A. (2009). Finding causes of program output with the Java Whyline. CHI 09, 1569--1578. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. }}Kuleza, T. et al. (2009). Fixing the Program My Computer Learned: Barriers for Users, Challenges for the Machine. IUI 09, 187--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. }}Lim, B. Y., Dey, A. K. & Avrahami, D. (2009). Why and why not explanations improve the intelligibility of context-aware intelligent systems. CHI 09, 2119--2128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. }}Lim, B. Y., Dey, A. K. (2009). Assessing Demand for Intelligibility in Context-Aware Applications. Ubicomp 09, 195--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. }}1Lim, B. Y., & Dey, A. K. (2010). Toolkit to Support Intelligibility in Context-Aware Applications. To appear in Ubicomp 10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. }}Tullio, J. et al. (2007). How it works: A field study of non-technical users interacting with an intelligent system. CHI 07, 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Improving trust in context-aware applications with intelligibility

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UbiComp '10 Adjunct: Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference adjunct papers on Ubiquitous computing - Adjunct
      September 2010
      203 pages
      ISBN:9781450302838
      DOI:10.1145/1864431

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 September 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader