skip to main content
10.1145/1868521.1868586acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Supple: a flexible probabilistic data dissemination protocol for wireless sensor networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 October 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose a flexible proactive data dissemination approach for data gathering in self-organized Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN). Our protocol Supple, effectively distributes and stores monitored data in WSNs such that it can be later sent to or retrieved by a sink. Supple empowers sensors with the ability to make on the fly forwarding and data storing decisions and relies on flexible and self-organizing selection criteria, which can follow any predefined distribution law. Using formal analysis and simulation, we show that Supple is effective in selecting storing nodes that respect the predefined distribution criterion with low overhead and limited network knowledge.

References

  1. Z. Bar-Yossef, R. Friedman, and G. Kliot. RaWMS - Random Walk based lightweight Membership Service for wireless ad hoc networks. ACM Transaction on Computer Systems, 26(2):1--66, June 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Basagni, A. Carosi, E. Melachrinoudis, C. Petrioli, and Z. M. Wang. Controlled sink mobility for prolonging wireless sensor networks lifetime. Wireless Networks Journal, 14(6):831--858, Dec. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. I. Chatzigiannakis, A. Kinalis, and S. Nikoletseas. Efficient data propagation strategies in wireless sensor networks using a single mobile sink. Computer Communications, 31(5):896--914, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Eriksson, M. Faloutsos, and S. Krishnamurthy. Scalable ad hoc routing: The case for dynamic addressing. In Proc. of IEEE Infocom, Mar. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. R. Friedman, G. Kliot, and C. Avin. Probabilistic quorum systems in wireless ad hoc networks. In Proc. of the IEEE DSN, June 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. P. Gupta and P. Kumar. Critical power for asymptotic connectivity in wireless networks. In Proc. of Stochastic Analysis, control, optimization and applications, pages 547--566, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. E. B. Hamida and G. Chelius. A line-based data dissemination protocol for wireless sensor networks with mobile sink. In Proc. of IEEE ICC, May 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. W. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan. Energy-efficient communication protocols for wireless microsensor networks. In Proc. of Hawaaian Intl. Conf. on Systems Science, Jan. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. W. Heinzelman, J. Kulik, and H. Balakrishnan. Adaptive protocols for information dissemination in wireless sensor networks. In Proc. of ACM Mobicom, pages 174--185, Aug. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. M. Hellerstein, W. Hong, S. Madden, and K. Stanek. Beyond average: Toward sophisticated sensing with queries. In Proc. of Snd International Workshop, ISPN, LNCS. Springer, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. C. Intanagonwiwat, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. Directed diffusion: a scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks. In Proc. of ACM Mobicom, pages 56--67, Aug. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Kinalis and S. Nikoletseas. Adaptive redundancy for data propagation exploiting dynamic sensory mobility. In Proc. of 11th ACM MSWiM, pages 149--156, Oct. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. X. Liu, Q. Huang, and Y. Zhang. Balancing push and pull for efficient information discovery in large-scale sensor networks. IEEE Transaction on Mobile Computing, 6(3):241--251, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Luo and J. P. Hubaux. Joint mobility and routing for lifetime elongation in wireless sensor networks. In Proc. of the IEEE INFOCOM 2005, Mar. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Luo, J. Panchard, M. Piorkowski, M. Grossglauser, and J. P. Hubaux. Mobiroute: Routing towards a mobile sink for improving lifetime in sensor networks. In Proc. of IEEE/ACM DCOSS06, pages 480--497, San Francisco, CA, USA, June 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Madden, M. J. Franklin, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. TAG: a Tiny AGgregation Service for Ad-Hoc Sensor Networks. Proc. of ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 36, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. F. Marcelloni and M. Vecchio. A simple algorithm for data compression in wireless sensor networks. Communications Letters, IEEE, 12(6):411--413, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. R. Motwani and P. Raghavan. Randomized algorithms. ACM Computing Survey, 28(1):57--63, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. Rao, S. Ratnasamy, C. Papadimitriou, S. Shenker, and I. Stoica. Geographic routing without location information. In Proc. of ACM Mobicom, Apr. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Ratnasamy, D. Estrin, R. Govindan, B. Karp, and S. Shenker. Data-centric storage in sensornets. In Proc. of ACM Sicomm, Feb. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. M. Vecchio, A. C. Viana, A. Ziviani, and R. Friedman. Deep: Density-based proactive data dissemination protocol for wireless sensor networks with uncontrolled sink mobility. Elsevier Computer Communications Journal, 33(8), Jan. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. A. C. Viana, M. D. Amorim, S. Fdida, and J. F. Rezende. Indirect routing using distributed location information. In Proc. of IEEE PERCOM, Mar. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. C. Viana, A. Ziviani, and R. Friedman. Decoupling data dissemination from mobile sink's trajectory in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Letters, Mar. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Z. Vincze, D. Vass, R. Vida, A. Vidacs, and A. Telcs. Adaptive sink mobility in event-driven multi-hop wireless sensor networks. In Proc. of 1st International Conference on Integrated Internet Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks, pages 30--31, May 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. H. Yang, F. Ye, and B. Sikdar. SIMPLE: Using swarm intelligence methodology to design data acquisition protocol in sensor networks with mobile sinks. In Proc. of the IEEE INFOCOM, Apr. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Y. J. Zhao, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. Residual energy scans for monitoring wireless sensor networks. Technical report, UC Los Angeles, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Supple: a flexible probabilistic data dissemination protocol for wireless sensor networks

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              MSWIM '10: Proceedings of the 13th ACM international conference on Modeling, analysis, and simulation of wireless and mobile systems
              October 2010
              424 pages
              ISBN:9781450302746
              DOI:10.1145/1868521

              Copyright © 2010 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 17 October 2010

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate398of1,577submissions,25%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader