skip to main content
research-article

Participation of high school and undergraduate students who are deaf in research on American Sign Language animation

Published:01 June 2010Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The Linguistic and Assistive Technologies Laboratory (the "LATLab") at Queens College of The City University of New York conducts research on computational linguistics and human computer interaction - with a focus on assistive technology and accessibility applications for people with disabilities. We are currently conducting a five-year study supported by a National Science Foundation CAREER Award (NSF Award #0746556). The goals of this research are to significantly improve the state of the art of animations of American Sign Language (ASL), which have important accessibility applications for people who are deaf. (Details of the scientific aims of this project are included below.)

This article describes the educational outreach component of this project --- the participation of deaf high school students and undergraduate students in summer research experiences. Our goal in writing this article is to describe how the educational component of our project integrates with the scientific goals and to explain some of the details behind the summer research experiences we have organized. We hope that other SIGACCESS members who are interested in incorporating educational outreach efforts into their research may find this information useful when designing and proposing their own projects.

There are several deaf students and researchers involved in our project. Each summer, two or three students from local deaf high schools or mainstream programs in the greater New York City area participate in three-month research experiences at the LATLab. In addition, we have also hosted a deaf undergraduate student (visiting from Gallaudet University) for a summer research experience, and a graduate-level deaf research assistant coordinates projects at the lab on an ongoing basis part-time throughout the academic year.

We believe that the involvement of deaf ASL-signers in the research will help to train future researchers who have a community and cultural connection to the outcome of the work. Further, only users of ASL who have native level fluency are able to accomplish some of the aspects of the research: analyzing recordings of sign language we collect and conducting experimental sessions in which native ASL signers from the local community come to the lab to evaluate the ASL animations we produce.

Our objective is to attract deaf students to careers in computer science by enabling deaf high school and undergraduate students to experience the research process. Students with disabilities pursue science careers at a lower than average rate (CEOSE, 2004), and our goal is to encourage the interest of these students in pursuing higher education and careers in the sciences, at a time when they may be making decisions about their future education. While these students have minimal programming or linguistics background, their ASL fluency can allow them to make meaningful contributions to the project. We want them to become aware of applications of computer science with direct relevance to the deaf community --- generating animations of American Sign Language to make information sources more accessible to deaf individuals who may have low literacy in written English.

References

  1. AccessComputing. 2007. AccessComputing Mini-Grants. AccessComputing Website, DO-IT Program, University of Washington. http://www.washington.edu/accesscomputing/ac-mini-grant.html (Retreived on June 20, 2007.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Bungeroth, D. Stein, P. Dreuw, M. Zahedi, H. Ney. 2006. A German sign language corpus of the domain weather report. Proc. LREC 2006 workshop on representation & processing of sign languages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. CEOSE: Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering. 2004. Broadening Participation in America's Science and Engineering Workforce. December 2004, 1994--2003 Decennial & Biennial Reports to Congress.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. O. Crasborn, H. Sloetjes, E. Auer, and P. Wittenburg. 2006. Combining video and numeric data in the analysis of sign languages within the ELAN annotation software. Proc. LREC 2006 workshop on representation & processing of sign languages, 82--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. DO-IT. 2010. DO-IT Program Website. http://www.washington.edu/doit/ (Retrieved on June 13, 2010.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. E. Efthimiou, S. E. Fotinea. 2007. GSLC: creation and annotation of a Greek sign language corpus for HCI. Proc. HCI International. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gallaudet Research Institute. 2007. Research at Gallaudet. Gallaudet Research Institute website, Gallaudet University. http://research.gallaudet.edu/Reports/details/419 (Retreived on June 20, 2007.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Huenerfauth. 2009a. "A Linguistically Motivated Model for Speed and Pausing in Animations of American Sign Language." ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing. Volume 2, Number 2, Article 9, New York: ACM Press, Pages 1--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Huenerfauth. 2009b. "Improving Spatial Reference in American Sign Language Animation through Data Collection from Native ASL Signers." International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (UAHCI). San Diego, CA. July 2009. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal Access in HCI, Part III, HCII 2009, LNCS 5616, pp. 530--539, 2009. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Huenerfauth, P. Lu. 2010a, to appear. "Effect of Spatial Reference and Verb Infection on the Usability of American Sign Language Animations." Universal Access in the Information Society. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Huenerfauth, P. Lu. 2010b, to appear. "Modeling and Synthesizing Spatially Inflected Verbs for American Sign Language Animations." The 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS 2010), Orlando, Florida, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. D. Lopatto. 2004. Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biol. Ed. 3, 270--277.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. P. Lu, M. Huenerfauth. 2010. "Collecting a Motion-Capture Corpus of American Sign Language for Data- Driven Generation Research," In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies (SLPAT), Human Language Technologies: The 11th Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT-NAACL 2010), Los Angeles, CA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. Mitchell, T. A. Young, B. Bachleda, and M. A. Karchmer. 2006. "How Many People Use ASL in the United States? Why Estimates Need Updating," Sign Language Studies, 6:4, pp. 306--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. C. Neidle, D. Kegl, D. MacLaughlin, B. Bahan, & R. G. Lee. 2000. The syntax of ASL: functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. NTID. 2010. "Explore Your Future (EYF)." http://www.ntid.rit.edu/prospective/eyf.php (Retrieved on June 13, 2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. B. Seal, D. Wynne, and G. MacDonald. 2002. Deaf Students, Teachers, and Interpreters in the Chemistry Lab. Journal of Chemical Education. 79:239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Summer Academy. 2010. The 2010 Summer Academy for Advancing Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing in Computing. http://www.washington.edu/accesscomputing/dhh/academy/ (Retrieved on June 13, 2010.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. C. Traxler. 2000. The Stanford achievement test, 9th edition: national norming and performance standards for deaf & hard-of-hearing students. J Deaf Stud & Deaf Educ 5(4):337--348.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing
    ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing Just Accepted
    June 2010
    30 pages
    ISSN:1558-2337
    EISSN:1558-1187
    DOI:10.1145/1873532
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2010 Author

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 June 2010

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader