skip to main content
research-article

AirLab: consistency, fidelity and privacy in wireless measurements

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 January 2011Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Accurate measurements of deployed wireless networks are vital for researchers to perform realistic evaluation of proposed systems. Unfortunately, the difficulty of performing detailed measurements limits the consistency in parameters and methodology of current datasets. Using different datasets, multiple research studies can arrive at conflicting conclusions about the performance of wireless systems. Correcting this situation requires consistent and comparable wireless traces collected from a variety of deployment environments. In this paper, we describe AirLab, a distributed wireless data collection infrastructure that uses uniformly instrumented measurement nodes at heterogeneous locations to collect consistent traces of both standardized and user-defined experiments. We identify four challenges in the AirLab platform, consistency, fidelity, privacy, security, and describe our approaches to address them.

References

  1. http://www.hacom.net.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. AFANASYEV, M., CHEN, T., VOELKER, G. M., AND SNOEREN, A. C. Analysis of a mixed-use urban wifi network: When metropolitan becomes neapolitan. In Proc. of IMC (October 2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. AGUAYO, D., ET AL. Link-level measurements from an 802.11b mesh network. In Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM (September 2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. AGUILARA.J. Packet trace anonymization with pktanon. Hack a day, July 2008. http://hackaday.com/2008/07/11/ packet-trace-anonymization-with-pktanon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. AKELLA, A., JUDD, G., SESHAN, S., AND STEENKISTE, P. Self-management in chaotic wireless deployments. In Proc. of MobiCom (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. BALASUBRAMANIAN, A., ET AL. Interactive WiFi Connectivity for Moving Vehicles. In Proc. SIGCOMM (Aug. 2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. BAVIER, A., ET AL. Operating system support for planetary-scale network services. In Proc. of NSDI (March 2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. BAVIER, A., ET AL. In vini veritas: realistic and controlled network experimentation. SIGCOMM CCR 36, 4 (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. BROUSTIS, I., ET AL. Mdg: Measurement-driven guidelines for 802.11 wlan design. In Proc. of Mobicom (Sept. 2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. BURKHART, M., ET AL. The role of network trace anonymization under attack. SIGCOMM CCR 40, 1 (January 2010), 5--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. CAMP, J., ET AL. A measurement study of multiplicative overhead effects in wireless networks. In Proc. of INFOCOM (April 2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. CHENG, Y.-C., ET AL. Jigsaw: solving the puzzle of enterprise 802.11 analysis. SIGCOMM CCR 36, 4 (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. CHENG, Y.-C., ET AL. Automating cross-layer diagnosis of enterprise wireless networks. SIGCOMM CCR 37, 4 (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. FAN, J., XU, J., AMMAR, M. H., AND MOON, S. B. Prefix-preserving IP address anonymization: measurement-based security evaluation and a new cryptography-based scheme. Computer Networks 46, 2 (October 2004), 253--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. HAN, D., ET AL. Mark-and-sweep: Getting the "inside" scoop on neighborhood networks. In Proc. of IMC (Oct. 2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. HENDERSON, T., KOTZ, D., AND ABYZOV, I. The changing usage of a mature campus-wide wireless network. In ACM MobiCom (Sept. 2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. JARDOSH, A. P., ET AL. Understanding congestion in ieee 802.11b wireless networks. In Proc. of IMC (Oct. 2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. JUDD, G., AND STEENKISTE, P. Using emulation to understand and improve wireless networks and applications. In Proc. of NSDI (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. KOTZ, D., AND ESSIEN, K. Analysis of a campus-wide wireless network. In ACM MobiCom (September 2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. MAHAJAN, R., ET AL. Analyzing the mac-level behavior of wireless networks in the wild. SIGCOMM CCR 36, 4 (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. MURTY, R., ET AL. Designing high performance enterprise wi-fi networks. In Proc. of NSDI (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. PANG, R., ALLMAN, M., PAXSON, V., AND LEE, J. The devil and packet trace anonymization. SIGCOMM CCR 36, 1 (2006), 29--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. QIU, L., BAHL, P., RAO, A., AND ZHOU, L. Troubleshooting multihop wireless networks. In Proc. of SIGMETRICS (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. RAGHAVENDRA, R., ET AL. Unwanted link layer traffic in large IEEE 802.11 wireless networks. In Proc. of IMC (Oct. 2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. RAYCHAUDHURI, D., ET AL. Overview of the orbit radio grid testbed for evaluation of next-generation wireless network protocols. In Proc. of WCNC (2005).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. SIMPSON, JR., C. R., AND RILEY, G. F. NETI@home: A distributed approach to collecting end-to-end network performance measurements. In Proc. of PAM (April 2004).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. WERNER-ALLEN,G.,SWIESKOWSKI,P.,ANDWELSH,M. Motelab: A wireless sensor network testbed. In Proc. of IPSN (April 2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. WOLF, T., ET AL. An architecture for distributed real-time passive network measurement. In Proc. of MASCOTS (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. YANG, L., CAO, L., ZHENG, H., AND BELDING, E. Traffic-aware dynamic spectrum access. In Proc. of WICON'08 (November 2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. ZHANG, X., ET AL. Study of a bus-based disruption tolerant network: Mobility modeling and impact on routing. In Proc. of Mobicom (Sept. 2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. AirLab: consistency, fidelity and privacy in wireless measurements

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
          ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 41, Issue 1
          January 2011
          132 pages
          ISSN:0146-4833
          DOI:10.1145/1925861
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2011 Authors

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 22 January 2011

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader