Elizabeth Kaziunas
ABSTRACT
A limited understanding of the distributed work practices of social scientists impedes current efforts to develop cyberinfrastructure (CI) that meets the needs of these scholars. In this paper we review literature on the theory, organization, collaborative practices, and epistemic cultures of the social sciences to summarize fundamental characteristics about the nature of their work practices. Building off these insights, we advance a document-centered articulation of social scientists' distributed work practices derived from a pilot study of scholars in the field of information studies. We use a mixed-methodological approach involving the mapping of digital and physical documents, automated tracking of desktop and online repositories, participant-generated images of physical documents and desktop, behavioral queries, along with interviews and participant observation. Our findings suggest that an approach focused on documents offers a tangible entree into understanding the distributed work practices of social scientists. This study aims to help further discussion surrounding the uptake of CI in the social sciences and the role of academic disciplines in the design of CI tools and projects.
- American Council of Learned Societies Commission for the Humanities and Social Sciences. 2006. Our cultural commonwealth. New York: ACLS. DOI=http://www.acls.org/cyberinfrastructure/acis.ci.report.pdf.Google Scholar
- Barjak, F., Lane, J., Kertcher, Z., Poschen, M., and Robinson, S. 2009. Case studies of e-infrastructure adoption. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 27, 4 (Nov. 2009), 583--600. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bazerman, C. 1981. What written knowledge does: three examples of academic discourse. Philos. Soc. Sci. 11, 3 (Sept. 1981), 335--359.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Beaulieu, A. and Wouters, P. 2009. E-research as intervention. In E-research: Transformations in Scholarly Practices N. W. Jankowski, Ed. Routledge, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
- Beecher, T. and Trowler, P. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Inquirty and the Culture of Disciplines (2nd ed.). Open University Press, Milton Keynes, UK.Google Scholar
- Berman, F. and Brady, H. 2005. Final Report: NSF SBE-CISE Workshop on Cyberinfrastructure and the Social Sciences. DOI=http://www.sdsc.edu/sbe/reports/SBE-CISE-FINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Collins, R. 1994. Why the social sciences won't become high-consensus, rapid discovery science. Sociol. Forum. 9, 2 (June 1994), 155--177.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cummings, J. and Kiesler, S. 2003. Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. In Scientific Collaboration on the Internet, G. Olson, A. Zimmerman, and N. Bos, Eds. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Dutton, W. H. 2007. Reconfiguring access to information and expertise in the social sciences: the social shaping and implications of cyberinfrastructure. In Proceedings from the 3rd International Conference on e-Social Science. (Ann Arbor, Michigan, October 7--9, 2007).Google Scholar
- Dutton, W. H. and Meyer, E. T. 2008. E-social science as an experience technology: distance from, and attitudes toward, e-research. In Proceedings from 4th International Conference on e-Social Science (Manchester, UK, June18--19, 2008).Google Scholar
- Fleck, J. 1994. Learning by trying: the implementation of configurational technology. Res. Policy. 23, 1 (Jan. 1994), 637--652.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fry, J. 2006. Coordination and control of research practices across scientific fields: implications for a differentiated e-science. In New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding e-Science, C. Hine, Ed. Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA.Google Scholar
- Fry, J. and Schroeder, R. 2009. Towards a sociology of e-research. In E-Research: Transformations in Scholarly Practices, N. W. Jankowski, Ed. Routledge, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Hine, C. 2006. Computerization movements and scientific disciplines: the reflexive potential of new technologies. In New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding e-Science, C. Hine, Ed. Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA.Google Scholar
- Knorr-Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
- Lin, Y.-W., Procter, R., Halfpenny, P., Voss, A., and Baird, K. 2007. An action-oriented ethnography of interdisciplinary social scientific work. Proceedings from the 3rd e-Social Science Conference (Ann Arbor, MI, October 7--9, 2007).Google Scholar
- Meho, L. and Tibbo, H. 2003. Modeling the information-seeking behavior of social scientists: ellis' study revisited. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tec. 54, 6 (April 2003), 570--587. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Merz, M. 2006. Embedding digital infrastructure in epistemic culture. In New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding e-Science, C. Hine, Ed. Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA.Google Scholar
- Olson, J., Hofer, E., Bos, N., Zimmerman, A., Olson, G., Cooney, D. and Faniel, I. 2003. A theory of remote scientific collaboration. In Scientific Collaboration on the Internet, G. Olson, A. Zimmerman, and N. Bos, Eds. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Østerlund, C. 2008. Documents in place: demarcating places for collaboration in healthcare settings. Comp. Support. Comp. W. 17, 2--3 (April 2008), 195--225. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pieri, E. 2009. Sociology of expectation and the e-social science agenda. Information, Communication & Society. 12,7 (Oct. 2009), 1103--1118.Google Scholar
- Ponti, M. 2010. Actors in Collaboration: Sociotechnical Influence on Practice-Research Collaboration. Doctoral Thesis. University of Gothenburg. DOI=http://bada.hb.se/bitstream/2320/5458/2/Avhandlingen.pdf.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, A. 2008. Philosophy of Social Science, 3rd Edition, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
- Sawyer, S. and Tapia, A. 2007. From findings to theories: institutionalizing social informatics. Inform. Soc. 23,4 (September 2007), 263--275. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schroeder, R., and Fry, J. 2007. Social science approaches to e-Science: Framing an agenda. J. Comput. Meadiat. Comm. 12, 2 (January 2007), 229--248.Google Scholar
- Schroeder, R. and Spencer, D. 2009. Social scientists and the domestication of e-research tools. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on e-Social Science (Cologne, Germany, June 24--26, 2009).Google Scholar
- Smith, D. E. 1990. Texts, Facts, and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. Routledge, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Sonnenwald, D. H., Lassi, M., Olson, N., Ponti, M., and Axelsson, A-S. 2009. Exploring new ways of working using virtual research environments in library and information science. Libr. Hi. Tech. 27, 2 (Feb. 2009), 191--204.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Star, S. L. and Ruhdeler, K. 1996. Steps toward an ecology infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Inform. Syst. Res. 7, 1 (Mar. 1996), 111--134.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Traweek, S. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Wessels, B. and Craglia, M. 2007. Situated innovation of e-social science: integrating infrastructure, collaboration, and knowledge in developing e-social science. J. Comput. Mediat. Comm. 12, 2 (Jan. 2007), 358--377.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Whitley, R. 2000. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wouters, P. and Beaulieu, A. 2006. Imagining e-science beyond computation. In C. Hine (Ed.), New Infrastructures for Knowledge Production: Understanding E-Science. Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Social scientists, documents and cyberinfrastructure: the cobbler's children or the missing masses?
Recommendations
Social scientists and cyberinfrastructure: insights from a document perspective
CSCW '12: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative WorkContemporary cyberinfrastructure (CI) seem poorly developed to meet the distributed work practices of social scientists. We draw from the literatures of science studies and e-science practices to advance a document-centered articulation of social ...
Towards an integrated methodological framework for understanding embodiment in HCI
CHI EA '14: CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe third wave in HCI reveals how embodiment matters in post-WIMP computing systems. Yet it is still unclear what methods provide effective insight into the nature of embodiment in HCI in relation to both design and use. This paper presents work in ...
Documents in Place: Demarcating Places for Collaboration in Healthcare Settings
The notion of place often connotes our understood reality populated with people, practices, meanings, and artifacts. This paper suggests that documents, whether electronic, paper-based, or set in stone, offer important insights into how people establish ...
Comments