skip to main content
10.1145/1962300.1962340acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Commanders Dashboard: overview of tactical changes to improve situated decision making in the field

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 August 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Motivation -- To support group commanders of small tactical units in information exchange and decision making while in the field, a mobile system called Commanders Dashboard is developed.

Research approach -- Based on a situated Cognitive Engineering (sCE) methodology, user requirements and claims for this decision support system are specified. A prototype system is designed that presents a geographical overview, (changes in) the assignment and decision support. A first assessment of these claims is done by having four end-users interact with the prototype on a mission through a virtual environment. A qualitative analysis with questionnaires and a debriefing discussion gives insight into the ease and accuracy of decision making and user experience of the prototype.

Findings -- The sCE methodology helped to establish a first---theoretical and empirical founded---decision support prototype to be iteratively improved. Users were very positive about ease of use and decision support from the system. However, auditory feedback, the amount of information presented and user trust should be improved.

Research limitations/Implications -- The generalizability of the evaluation outcomes is limited because of a small number of qualitative measures and end-users.

Originality/Value -- This research emphasizes that incorporating operational demands and human factors knowledge helps to improve and refine the knowledge base for the design of mobile decision support.

Take away message -- Future decision support should show how tactical changes affect the Commanders options.

References

  1. Adamczyk, P. D. and Bailey, B. P. (2004). If Not Now, When? The Effects of Interruption at Different Moments Within Task Execution. In Proceedings of CHI (pp. 271--278). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Adkins, M., Kruse, J., and Younger, R. (2002). Ubiquitous computing: omnipresent technology in support of Network Centric Warfare. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference in System Sciences. (pp. 551--559). IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bailey, B. P. and Konstan, J. A. (2006). On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 685--708.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Carroll, J. M. (2000). Making use - scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Duistermaat, M., Caljouw, C.J., and de Vries, S.C. (2009). Information needs of the dismounted soldier and his Group {in Dutch}. TNO Report (TNO-DV 2009 A231). Soesterberg, the Netherlands: TNO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Endsley, M., Bolte, B., and Jones, D. (2003). Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to User-Centered Design. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferscha, A. (2000). Workspace awareness in mobile virtual teams. In Proceedings of IEEE 9th International Workshops on Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE 2000). (pp. 272--277). Gaithersburg, MD, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. ISO 9241-11 (1998). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) -- Part 11: Guidance on usability.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jameson, A. (2001). Modeling Both the Context and the User. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 5, 29--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lee, van der M.D.E., and Spaans, M. (2004). Functionality of the soldier digital assistant {in Dutch}. TNO Report (FEL-00-A088). The Hague, the Netherlands: TNO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. McCrickard, D.S., and Chewar, C.M. (2003). Attuning notification design to user goals and attention costs. Communications of the ACM, 46(3), 67--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. McFarlane, D., and Latorella, K. (2002). The scope and importance of human interruption in humancomputer interaction design. Human-Computer Interaction, 17(1), 1--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Miller, C.A., and Parasuraman, R. (2007). Designing for flexible interaction between humans and automation: Delegation interfaces for supervisory control. Human Factors, 49(1), 57--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Miyata, Y. and Norman, D. (1986). Psychological issues in support of multiple activities. In D. Norman and S. Draper (Eds.), User Centered Systems Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale: LEA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Muir, B.M. (1994). Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37(11), 1905--1922.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Neerincx, M.A. and Lindenberg, J. (2008). Situated cognitive engineering for complex task environments. In: J.M.C. Schraagen, L. Militello, T. Ormerod, and R. Lipshitz (Eds.), Naturalistic Decision Making and Macrocognition (pp. 373--390). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Oulasvirta, A., Tamminen, S., Roto, V., and Kuorelahti, J. (2005). Interaction in 4-Second Bursts: The Fragmented Nature of Attentional Resources in Mobile HCl. In Proceedings of CHI (pp. 919--927). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Parasuraman R., and Riley, V. (1997). Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse. Human Factors 39(2), 230--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Smets, N.J.J.M., Bradshaw, J.M., van Diggelen, J., Jonker, C.M., Neerincx, M.A., de Rijk, L.J.V., Senster, P.A.M., Sierhuis, M., ten Thije, J.O.A.. (submitted). Method and simulation platform to assess human-agent teams for future space missions. Intelligent Systems, AI Space Odyssey. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Smets, N.J.J.M., Jansen, C., Jong, de J.G.M., and Neerincx, M.A. (2009). Future user interfaces for information and communication devices for dismounted soldiers. TNO report (TNO-DV 2009 A266).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Spaans, M., Barbier, B.B., and van der Lee, M.D.E. (2005). Controlled field trials with the Communication and Information Module for the dismounted soldier. TNO report (TNO-DV 2006 C513).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. St John, M. and Smallman, H.S., (2008). Staying Up to Speed: Four Design Principles for Maintaining and Recovering Situation Awareness. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2(2), 118--139Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Commanders Dashboard: overview of tactical changes to improve situated decision making in the field

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              ECCE '10: Proceedings of the 28th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
              August 2010
              380 pages
              ISBN:9781605589466
              DOI:10.1145/1962300

              Copyright © 2010 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 25 August 2010

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate56of91submissions,62%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader