skip to main content
10.1145/1963192.1963344acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ranked answer graph construction for keyword queries on RDF graphs without distance neighbourhood restriction

Published:28 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

RDF and RDFS have recently become very popular as frameworks for representing data and meta-data in form of a domain description, respectively. RDF data can also be thought of as graph data. In this paper, we focus on keyword-based querying of RDF data. In the existing approaches for answering such keyword queries, keywords are mapped to nodes in the graph and their neighborhoods are explored to extract subgraph(s) of the data graph that contain(s) information relevant to the query. In order to restrict the computational effort, a fixed distance bound is used to define the neighborhoods of nodes. In this paper we present an elegant algorithm for keyword query processing on RDF data that does not assume such a fixed bound. The approach adopts a pruned exploration mechanism where closely related nodes are identified, subgraphs are pruned and joined using suitable hook nodes. The system dynamically manages the distance depending on the closeness between the keywords. The working of the algorithm is illustrated using a fragment of AIFB institute data represented as an RDF graph.

References

  1. Allemang, D., and Hendler, J. Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist Modeling in RDF, RDFS and OWL. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Reading, Massachusetts, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. Kimfield, and Y. Sagir. Finding and approximating top-k answers in keyword proximity search. In PODS 2006 (2006), ACM, pp. 173--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Bhalotia, A. Hulgeri, C. Nakhe, S. Chakraborti, and S. Sudharshan. Keyword searching and browsing in database using banks. In ICDE 2002 (2002), ACM, pp. 431--440. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H. He, H. Wang, J. Yang, and P. S. Yu. Blinks: Ranked keyword searches on graphs. In SIGMOD Conference 2007 (2007), ACM, pp. 305--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Kasneci, G., Ramanath, M., Sozio, M., Suchanek, F., and Weikum, G. Star: Steiner tree approximation in relationship graphs. In 25th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2009 (2009), IEEE, pp. 868--879. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K. Parthasarathy, P. Sreenivasa Kumar, and Damien, D. Answer graph construction for keyword search on graph structured (rdf) data. In International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval(KDIR) 2010 (Oct 2010), INSTICC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lei, Y., Uren, V., and Molta, E. Semsearch: A search engine for the semantic web. In 15th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW), (2006) (2006), pp. 238--245. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. Guo, F. Shao, C. Botev, and J. Shanmugasundaram. Xrank: Ranked keyword search over xml documents. In SIGMOD Conference 2003 (2003), ACM, pp. 16--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Li, G., Ooi, B. C., Feng, J., Wang, J., and Zhou, L. Ease: An effective 3-in-1 keyword search method for unstructured, semi-structured and structured data. In SIGMOD 2008 (2008), ACM, pp. 1452--1455. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Q. Zhou, C. Wang, M. Xiong, H. Wang, and Y. Yu. Spark: Adapting keyword query to semantic search. In ISWC/ASWC, 2007 (2007), SWSA, pp. 694--707. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Revuri, S., Upadhyaya, S., and P. Sreenivasa Kumar. Using domain ontologies for efficient information retrieval. In International Conference on Management of Data COMAD 2006 (Dec 2006), CSI, pp. 84--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Tran, P. Camiano, S. Rudolph, and R. Studer. Ontology based interpretation of keywords for semantic search. In ISWC/ASWC, 2007 (2007), SWSA, pp. 523--536. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. V. Kacholia, S. Pandit, S. Chakraborti, S. Sudharshan, R. Desai, and H. Karambelkar. Bidirectional expansion for keyword search on graph databases. In VLDB 2005 (2005), VLDB, pp. 505--516. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Cai, X. Dong, A. Halevy, J. Liu, and J. Madhavan. Personal information management with semex. In SIGMOD 2005 (2005), ACM, pp. 921--923. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Y. Sure, S. Bloehdorn, P. Haase, J. Hartmann, and D. Oberle. The swrc ontology - semantic web for research communities. In In Proceedings of the 12th Portuguese Conference on AI (EPIA 2005) (2005), ECCAI, pp. 218--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Ranked answer graph construction for keyword queries on RDF graphs without distance neighbourhood restriction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '11: Proceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World wide web
      March 2011
      552 pages
      ISBN:9781450306379
      DOI:10.1145/1963192

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 March 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader